Animal Versus Wind Dispersal and the Robustness of Tree Species to Deforestation

Studies suggest that populations of different species do not decline equally after habitat loss. However, empirical tests have been confined to fine spatiotemporal scales and have rarely included plants. Using data from 89,365 forest survey plots covering peninsular Spain, we explored, for each of 34 common tree species, the relationship between probability of occurrence and the local cover of remaining forest. Twenty-four species showed a significant negative response to forest loss, so that decreased forest cover had a negative effect on tree diversity, but the responses of individual species were highly variable. Animal-dispersed species were less vulnerable to forest loss, with six showing positive responses to decreased forest cover. The results imply that plant-animal interactions help prevent the collapse of forest communities that suffer habitat destruction.

[1]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity , 2007 .

[2]  Ran Nathan,et al.  Incorporating dispersal distance into the disperser effectiveness framework: frugivorous birds provide complementary dispersal to plants in a patchy environment. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[3]  P. Jordano,et al.  Differential contribution of frugivores to complex seed dispersal patterns , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Drew W. Purves,et al.  Environmental heterogeneity, bird-mediated directed dispersal, and oak woodland dynamics in Mediterranean Spain , 2007 .

[5]  James E. Hines,et al.  A Large-Scale Deforestation Experiment: Effects of Patch Area and Isolation on Amazon Birds , 2007, Science.

[6]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Corridors for Conservation: Integrating Pattern and Process , 2006 .

[7]  Nick M Haddad,et al.  Corridors Increase Plant Species Richness at Large Scales , 2006, Science.

[8]  R. Solé,et al.  Ecological networks and their fragility , 2006, Nature.

[9]  F. Valladares,et al.  Performance of seedlings of Mediterranean woody species under experimental gradients of irradiance and water availability: trade-offs and evidence for niche differentiation. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[10]  Richard V. Solé,et al.  Self-Organization in Complex Ecosystems. , 2006 .

[11]  J. Dushoff,et al.  Directed seed dispersal and metapopulation response to habitat loss and disturbance: application to Eichhornia paniculata , 2005 .

[12]  L. Curran,et al.  Seed dispersal and recruitment limitation across spatial scales in temperate forest fragments , 2004 .

[13]  L. Fahrig.  Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity , 2003 .

[14]  J. Gómez,et al.  Spatial patterns in long-distance dispersal of Quercus ilex acorns by jays in a heterogeneous landscape , 2003 .

[15]  Michael L. Cain,et al.  ARE LONG‐DISTANCE DISPERSAL EVENTS IN PLANTS USUALLY CAUSED BY NONSTANDARD MEANS OF DISPERSAL? , 2003 .

[16]  Karin Johst,et al.  Metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes: the role of dispersal distance , 2002 .

[17]  L. Conradt,et al.  Dispersal behaviour of individuals in metapopulations of two British butterflies , 2001 .

[18]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Habitat patchiness and plant species richness , 2001 .

[19]  S Pacala,et al.  Long-Term Studies of Vegetation Dynamics , 2001, Science.

[20]  L. Fahrig.  How much habitat is enough , 2001 .

[21]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Nonrandom extinction and the loss of evolutionary history. , 2000, Science.

[22]  C. Restrepo,et al.  ANTHROPOGENIC EDGES, TREEFALL GAPS, AND FRUIT–FRUGIVORE INTERACTIONS IN A NEOTROPICAL MONTANE FOREST , 1999 .

[23]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation structure and migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia , 1994 .

[24]  G. C. Bachiller.  Semillas de árboles y arbustos forestales , 1991 .

[25]  G. L. González.  La guía de INCAFO de los árboles y arbustos de la Península Ibérica , 1982 .

[26]  Christopher C. Smith,et al.  The Optimal Balance between Size and Number of Offspring , 1974, The American Naturalist.