Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion

Abstract. Adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion remains a widely acknowledged problem, but there is insufficient knowledge regarding the factors that contribute to its occurrence. The aim of this study is to analyse the relationship between abnormal sagittal plane configuration of the lumbar spine and the development of adjacent segment degeneration. Eighty-three consecutive patients who underwent lumbar fusion for degenerative disc disease were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with spondylolytic spondylolisthesis and degenerative scoliosis were not included in this study. Mean follow-up period was 5 years. Results were analysed to determine the association between abnormal sagittal configuration and post operative adjacent segment degeneration. Thirty-one out of 83 patients (36.1%) showed radiographic evidence of adjacent segment degeneration. Patients with normal C7 plumb line and normal sacral inclination in the immediate post operative radiographs had the lowest incidence of adjacent level change compared with patients who had abnormality in one or both of these parameters. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.02). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adjacent level degeneration between male and female patients; between posterior fusion alone and combined posterolateral and posterior interbody fusions; and between fusions extending down to the sacrum and fusions stopping short of the sacrum. It was concluded was that normality of sacral inclination is an important parameter for minimizing the incidence of adjacent level degeneration. Retrolisthesis was the most common type of adjacent segment change. Patients with post operative sagittal plane abnormalities should preferably be followed-up for at least 5 years to detect adjacent level changes.

[1]  T. Whitecloud,et al.  Operative treatment of the degenerated segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. , 1994, Spine.

[2]  K. Roach,et al.  Normal hip and knee active range of motion: the relationship to age. , 1991, Physical therapy.

[3]  J. Silver,et al.  The causes of failure of lumbar transpedicular spinal instrumentation and fusion , 1996, International Orthopaedics.

[4]  L. Wiltse,et al.  Comparative study of the incidence and severity of degenerative change in the transition zones after instrumented versus noninstrumented fusions of the lumbar spine. , 1999, Journal of spinal disorders.

[5]  R. Fraser,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Disc Degeneration 10 Years After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 1995, Spine.

[6]  L. Claes,et al.  Effects of specimen length on the monosegmental motion behavior of the lumbar spine. , 2000, Spine.

[7]  S. Hansen,et al.  Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[8]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Long-term Follow-up of Lower Lumbar Fusion Patients , 1987, Spine.

[9]  John H. Evans,et al.  Effects of Short Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Biomechanics of Neighboring Unfused Segments , 1996, Spine.

[10]  P. Guigui,et al.  [Long-term outcome at adjacent levels of lumbar arthrodesis]. , 1997, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[11]  CASEY K. LEE,et al.  Accelerated Degeneration of the Segment Adjacent to a Lumbar Fusion , 1988, Spine.

[12]  J. Schlegel,et al.  Lumbar Motion Segment Pathology Adjacent to Thoracolumbar, Lumbar, and Lumbosacral Fusions , 1996, Spine.

[13]  J. Hecquet,et al.  Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[14]  K. Cho,et al.  Adding Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion to Pedicle Screw Fixation and Posterolateral Fusion After Decompression in Spondylolytic Spondylolisthesis , 1997, Spine.

[15]  S. Eiskjær,et al.  Functional outcome after posterolateral spinal fusion using pedicle screws: comparison between primary and salvage procedure , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[16]  T. C. Howard,et al.  Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Lumbosacral Motion below Fusion Levels in Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1988, Spine.

[17]  M. Rahm,et al.  Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study. , 1996, Journal of spinal disorders.

[18]  O. Airaksinen,et al.  Surgical Results of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comparison of Patients With or Without Previous Back Surgery , 1995, Spine.

[19]  J L Lewis,et al.  The effects of immobilization of long segments of the spine on the adjacent and distal facet force and lumbosacral motion. , 1993, Spine.

[20]  S. Voutsinas,et al.  Sagittal profiles of the spine. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  L. Wiltse,et al.  The Transition Zone Above a Lumbosacral Fusion , 1998, Spine.

[22]  Kevin W. McEnery,et al.  An Analysis of Sagittal Spinal Alignment in 100 Asymptomatic Middle and Older Aged Volunteers , 1995, Spine.

[23]  J. Frymoyer,et al.  Disc Excision and Spine Fusion in the Management of Lumbar Disc Disease: A Minimum Ten-Year Followup , 1978, Spine.

[24]  B. Freeman,et al.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion combined with instrumented postero-lateral fusion: 5-year results in 60 patients , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[25]  R. Jackson,et al.  Radiographic Analysis of Sagittal Plane Alignment and Balance in Standing Volunteers and Patients with Low Back Pain Matched for Age, Sex, and Size: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Study , 1994, Spine.

[26]  P. Dolan,et al.  Regional Assessment of Joint Position Sense in the Spine , 1998, Spine.

[27]  J. Lewis,et al.  Effect of immobilization and configuration on lumbar adjacent-segment biomechanics. , 1993, Journal of spinal disorders.

[28]  K. Kumano,et al.  Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments after rigid pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. , 1995, Journal of spinal disorders.

[29]  S Etebar,et al.  Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[30]  J. Perry,et al.  Gait Abnormalities Arising from latrogenic Loss of Lumbar Lordosis Secondary to Harrington Instrumentation in Lumbar Fractures , 1983, Spine.

[31]  S. McGill,et al.  The relationship between lumbar spine load and muscle activity during extensor exercises. , 1998, Physical therapy.