A Multiday Evaluation of Real-Time Intramuscular EMG Usability with ANN

Recent developments in implantable technology, such as high-density recordings, wireless transmission of signals to a prosthetic hand, may pave the way for intramuscular electromyography (iEMG)-based myoelectric control in the future. This study aimed to investigate the real-time control performance of iEMG over time. A novel protocol was developed to quantify the robustness of the real-time performance parameters. Intramuscular wires were used to record EMG signals, which were kept inside the muscles for five consecutive days. Tests were performed on multiple days using Fitts’ law. Throughput, completion rate, path efficiency and overshoot were evaluated as performance metrics using three train/test strategies. Each train/test scheme was categorized on the basis of data quantity and the time difference between training and testing data. An artificial neural network (ANN) classifier was trained and tested on (i) data from the same day (WDT), (ii) data collected from the previous day and tested on present-day (BDT) and (iii) trained on all previous days including the present day and tested on present-day (CDT). It was found that the completion rate (91.6 ± 3.6%) of CDT was significantly better (p < 0.01) than BDT (74.02 ± 5.8%) and WDT (88.16 ± 3.6%). For BDT, on average, the first session of each day was significantly better (p < 0.01) than the second and third sessions for completion rate (77.9 ± 14.0%) and path efficiency (88.9 ± 16.9%). Subjects demonstrated the ability to achieve targets successfully with wire electrodes. Results also suggest that time variations in the iEMG signal can be catered by concatenating the data over several days. This scheme can be helpful in attaining stable and robust performance.

[1]  R A Brand,et al.  Surface vs. fine-wire electrode ensemble-averaged signals during gait. , 1995, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[2]  Kevin C. McGill,et al.  Resolving Superimposed MUAPs Using Particle Swarm Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  I Petersén,et al.  Implantation of micro-circuits for myo-electric control of prostheses. , 1968, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  Ernest Nlandu Kamavuako,et al.  Effect of threshold values on the combination of EMG time domain features: Surface versus intramuscular EMG , 2018, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[5]  Carlo J De Luca,et al.  Decomposition of indwelling EMG signals. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[6]  Winnie Jensen,et al.  Multiday Evaluation of Techniques for EMG-Based Classification of Hand Motions , 2019, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[7]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  Comparison of surface and intramuscular EMG pattern recognition for simultaneous wrist/hand motion classification , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[8]  R B Stein,et al.  New approaches for the control of powered prostheses particularly by high-level amputees. , 1980, Bulletin of prosthetics research.

[9]  D. Zazula,et al.  Correlation-based decomposition of surface electromyograms at low contraction forces , 2004, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[10]  Xinjun Sheng,et al.  User adaptation in long-term, open-loop myoelectric training: implications for EMG pattern recognition in prosthesis control , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[11]  S. Jain,et al.  Improving long term myoelectric decoding, using an adaptive classifier with label correction , 2012, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[12]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Control scheme governing concurrently active human motor units during voluntary contractions , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  David Hankin,et al.  First-in-man demonstration of a fully implanted myoelectric sensors system to control an advanced electromechanical prosthetic hand , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  F. R. Tucker,et al.  Microelectronic telemetry implant for myo-electric control of a powered prosthesis , 1977, Canadian Electrical Engineering Journal.

[15]  Dario Farina,et al.  Multiday EMG-Based Classification of Hand Motions with Deep Learning Techniques , 2018, Sensors.

[16]  P. Fitts,et al.  Information capacity of discrete motor responses under different cognitive sets. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  Hossein Parsaei,et al.  EMG Signal Decomposition Using Motor Unit Potential Train Validity , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[18]  R.F. Kirsch,et al.  Evaluation of Head Orientation and Neck Muscle EMG Signals as Command Inputs to a Human–Computer Interface for Individuals With High Tetraplegia , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  Erik J Scheme,et al.  On the usability of intramuscular EMG for prosthetic control: a Fitts' Law approach. , 2014, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[20]  Daniel McDonnall,et al.  Implantable multichannel wireless electromyography for prosthesis control , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[21]  Darrin J. Young Wireless powering and data telemetry for biomedical implants , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[22]  Daniel R Merrill,et al.  Development of an implantable myoelectric sensor for advanced prosthesis control. , 2011, Artificial organs.

[23]  Winnie Jensen,et al.  The effect of time on EMG classification of hand motions in able-bodied and transradial amputees. , 2018, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[24]  Ernest Nlandu Kamavuako,et al.  Combined surface and intramuscular EMG for improved real-time myoelectric control performance , 2014, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[25]  Levi J Hargrove,et al.  A real-time comparison between direct control, sequential pattern recognition control and simultaneous pattern recognition control using a Fitts’ law style assessment procedure , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[26]  Dario Farina,et al.  A new method for the extraction and classification of single motor unit action potentials from surface EMG signals , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  A Comparison of Surface and Intramuscular Myoelectric Signal Classification , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  Philip R. Troyk,et al.  Implantable Myoelectric Sensors (IMESs) for Intramuscular Electromyogram Recording , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  Winnie Jensen,et al.  On the robustness of real-time myoelectric control investigations: a multiday Fitts' law approach. , 2019, Journal of neural engineering.

[30]  Enzo Mastinu,et al.  Evaluation of Computer-Based Target Achievement Tests for Myoelectric Control , 2017, IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine.