An upgraded reserve selection algorithm

Abstract A new reserve selection algorithm is proposed which minimises the possibility of widely dispersed sites being selected by including a rule to select the nearest site when sites are otherwise equal. The algorithm also minimises the number of order-dependent selections. A comparison between two solutions, one with and one without the rule to choose the nearest site, when there is a choice, shows that there is a cost associated with including that rule. It is argued, however, that a more sensible and manageable spatial arrangement for a nominal reserve network is derived by including that rule.

[1]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice , 1991 .

[2]  A. O. Nicholls How to make biological surveys go further with generalised linear models , 1989 .

[3]  B. Walker Biodiversity and Ecological Redundancy , 1992 .

[4]  Anthony G. Rebelo,et al.  Where Should Nature Reserves Be Located in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa? Models for the Spatial Configuration of a Reserve Network Aimed at Maximizing the Protection of Floral Diversity , 1992 .

[5]  D. Faith Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity , 1992 .

[6]  Andrew D. Taylor Metapopulations, Dispersal, and Predator‐Prey Dynamics: An Overview , 1990 .

[7]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Efficiency in conservation evaluation: Scoring versus iterative approaches , 1989 .

[8]  C. Solbreck,et al.  Unusual weather and insect population dynamics: Lygaeus equestris during an extinction and recovery period , 1991 .

[9]  David A. Keith,et al.  A new approach for selecting fully representative reserve networks: addressing efficiency, reserve design and land suitability with an iterative analysis , 1992 .

[10]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity , 1988 .

[11]  Chris Margules,et al.  Patterns in the distributions of species and the selection of nature reserves: An example from Eucalyptus forests in South-eastern New South Wales , 1989 .

[12]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus species , 1990 .

[13]  M. Austin,et al.  New approaches to direct gradient analysis using environmental scalars and statistical curve-fitting procedures , 1984 .

[14]  T. M. Smith,et al.  A new model for the continuum concept , 1989 .

[15]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Application of a Numerical Algorithm to the Selection of Reserves in Semi-arid New South Wales , 1989 .

[16]  A. Higgs,et al.  Island Biogeography Theory and Nature Reserve Design , 1981 .

[17]  Brendan Mackey,et al.  Assessing the representativeness of the wet tropics of Queensland world heritage property , 1989 .

[18]  Jamie B. Kirkpatrick,et al.  An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: An example from Tasmania , 1983 .

[19]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Measuring biodiversity taxonomic relatedness for conservation priorities , 1991 .

[20]  Mike P. Austin,et al.  Continuum Concept, Ordination Methods, and Niche Theory , 1985 .