Experimental Validation of the Invariance of Electrowetting Contact Angle Saturation

Abstract Basic electrowetting theory predicts that a continued increase in applied voltage will allow contact angle modulation to zero degrees. In practice, the effect of contact angle saturation has always been observed to limit the contact angle modulation, often only down to a contact angle of 60 to 70°. The physical origins of contact angle saturation have not yet been explained successfully and unequivocally. At best, scientists have produced multiple disconnected hypotheses (droplet ejection, charge injection, a thermodynamic limit, etc.) that do not satisfactorily hold for the large body of electrowetting experimental results. Herein we experimentally demonstrate that when using DC voltage, electrowetting contact angle saturation is invariant with electric field, contact line profile, interfacial tension, choice of non-polar insulating fluid, and type of polar conductive fluid or ionic content. The selected experiments were performed and designed using conventional electrowetting materials, without bias toward supporting a particular theory. Because the experimental results show such a strong invariance of saturation angle to multiple parameters, electrowetting saturation parallels many of the trends for Taylor cone formation. However, the contact line geometry is distinct from a Taylor cone, suggesting that some other (though related) form of electrohydrodynamic instability might cause saturation. Although this work does not unequivocally prove what causes contact angle saturation, it reveals what factors play a very limited or no role, and how dominant factors causing saturation may change with time of voltage application. This study thereby provides additional direction to the continued pursuit of a universal theory for electrowetting saturation.

[1]  M. Ferenets,et al.  Thin Solid Films , 2010 .

[2]  De-Ying Zhang,et al.  Integrated fluidic adaptive zoom lens. , 2004, Optics letters.

[3]  Manjeet Dhindsa,et al.  Ion and liquid dependent dielectric failure in electrowetting systems. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[4]  Richard B. Fair,et al.  Digital microfluidics: is a true lab-on-a-chip possible? , 2007 .

[5]  A. Mizuno,et al.  Development of contactless emulsification method using electrostatic phenomena for biological application , 2008 .

[6]  H. Verheijen,et al.  REVERSIBLE ELECTROWETTING AND TRAPPING OF CHARGE : MODEL AND EXPERIMENTS , 1999, cond-mat/9908328.

[7]  B. J. Feenstra,et al.  Video-speed electronic paper based on electrowetting , 2003, Nature.

[8]  I. Chronakis,et al.  Polymer nanofibers assembled by electrospinning , 2003 .

[9]  S. Kuiper,et al.  Variable-focus liquid lens for miniature cameras , 2004 .

[10]  Jason Heikenfeld,et al.  Fabrication and performance characteristics of black-dielectric electroluminescent 160 × 80-pixel displays , 2004 .

[11]  John Ralston,et al.  Electrowetting: a model for contact-angle saturation , 2000 .

[12]  B. Berge,et al.  Variable focal lens controlled by an external voltage: An application of electrowetting , 2000 .

[13]  Hsueh-Chia Chang,et al.  Anomalous conical menisci under an ac field-departure from the dc Taylor cone , 2006 .

[14]  Jason Heikenfeld,et al.  A full description of a simple and scalable fabrication process for electrowetting displays , 2009 .

[15]  C. Kim,et al.  Frequency-Based Relationship of Electrowetting and Dielectrophoretic Liquid Microactuation , 2003 .

[16]  A. I. Drygiannakis,et al.  On the connection between dielectric breakdown strength, trapping of charge, and contact angle saturation in electrowetting. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[17]  Thomas B. Jones,et al.  On the Relationship of Dielectrophoresis and Electrowetting , 2002 .

[18]  B. Berge,et al.  Limiting phenomena for the spreading of water on polymer films by electrowetting , 1999 .

[19]  Geoffrey Ingram Taylor,et al.  Disintegration of water drops in an electric field , 1964, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[20]  Graham Williams,et al.  Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation.

[21]  F. Mugele Fundamental challenges in electrowetting: from equilibrium shapes to contact angle saturation and drop dynamics , 2009 .

[22]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[23]  John Moult,et al.  Electrostatics , 1992, Current Biology.

[24]  John Ralston,et al.  Influence of the Electrical Double Layer in Electrowetting , 2003 .

[25]  Manuel Gamero-Castaño,et al.  Source of heavy molecular ions based on Taylor cones of ionic liquids operating in the pure ion evaporation regime , 2003 .

[26]  Jason Heikenfeld,et al.  Reliable and Low-Voltage Electrowetting on Thin Parylene Films , 2011 .

[27]  S. Herminghaus,et al.  Electrostatic stabilization of fluid microstructures , 2002 .

[28]  M. Márquez,et al.  Low-frequency ac electro-flow-focusing microfluidic emulsification , 2010 .

[29]  Friedrich Gunther Mugele,et al.  Equilibrium drop surface profiles in electric fields , 2007 .

[30]  Jonghyun Park,et al.  Instability of electrowetting on a dielectric substrate , 2011 .

[31]  Marco Antonio Fontelos,et al.  The Shape of Charged Drops over a Solid Surface and Symmetry-Breaking Instabilities , 2008, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[32]  Craig Priest,et al.  Electrowetting of Aqueous Solutions of Ionic Liquid in Solid−Liquid−Liquid Systems , 2010 .

[33]  Craig Priest,et al.  Static and dynamic electrowetting of an ionic liquid in a solid/liquid/liquid system. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[34]  J. Baret,et al.  Electrowetting: from basics to applications , 2005 .

[35]  John Ralston,et al.  Contact angle saturation in electrowetting. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[36]  R. J. Schwartz,et al.  Electrofluidic displays using Young-Laplace transposition of brilliant pigment dispersions , 2009 .

[37]  A. Wheeler,et al.  Digital microfluidics for cell-based assays. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[38]  C. Kim,et al.  An integrated digital microfluidic chip for multiplexed proteomic sample preparation and analysis by MALDI-MS. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[39]  Darrell H. Reneker,et al.  Taylor Cone and Jetting from Liquid Droplets in Electrospinning of Nanofibers , 2001 .