Early Identification of Children At Risk for Reading Disabilities

The present study examined the development of phonological and reading skills in 171 students (98 males, 73 females) from the beginning of first grade (Time 1) to the end of second grade (Time 4). Based on their reading and intelligence scores at the end of second grade, these students were placed into nondisabled (ND), reading disabled (RD), or garden-variety poor reading (GV) groups. Although each group made gains in phonological processing, large differences were found between the ND and RD/GV groups. The RD and GV groups performed similarly on many of the tasks. Consistent with the literature, it was found that intelligence does not differentiate between good and poor readers. The most important finding of the present study was that reader-group membership at Time 4 could be very accurately determined from students' Time 1 scores. All of the children in the RD and GV groups were correctly identified, and only 3 of the 148 ND children were misclassified, indicating that children at risk for reading difficulties can be very accurately identified very early in their academic experiences.

[1]  C. R. Mote,et al.  An Examination of Phonemic Processing Abilities in Children During Their First-Grade Year , 1993, Journal of learning disabilities.

[2]  Barbara J. Fox,et al.  Phonemic Analysis and Synthesis as Word-Attack Skills. , 1976 .

[3]  R. Woodcock Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised , 1987 .

[4]  D. Routh,et al.  Reading disability, phonemic analysis, and dysphonetic spelling: A follow‐up study , 1983 .

[5]  L. Siegel IQ Is Irrelevant to the Definition of Learning Disabilities , 1989, Journal of learning disabilities.

[6]  K. Stanovich Explaining the Differences Between the Dyslexic and the Garden-Variety Poor Reader , 1988, Journal of learning disabilities.

[7]  R. Wagner,et al.  The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. , 1987 .

[8]  D. P. Hurford,et al.  Assessment and Remediation of a Phonemic Discrimination Deficit in Reading Disabled Second and Fourth Graders. , 1990 .

[9]  Linnea C. Ehri,et al.  Do Alphabet Letters Help Prereaders Acquire Phonemic Segmentation Skill , 1983 .

[10]  J. A. Helfgott,et al.  Phonemic segmentation and blending skills of kindergarten children: Implications for beginning reading acquisition , 1976 .

[11]  N. Ellis,et al.  The development of reading: as you seek so shall you find. , 1987, British journal of psychology.

[12]  D. Routh,et al.  Phonemic analysis and severe reading disability in children , 1980, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[13]  Barbara Fox,et al.  Analyzing spoken language into words, syllables, and phonomes: A developmental study , 1975 .

[14]  Anthony F. Jorm,et al.  An invited article: Phonological recoding and reading acquisition , 1983, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[15]  K. Stanovich Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. , 1986 .

[16]  M. Bruck Persistence of dyslexics' phonological awareness deficits. , 1992 .

[17]  D. P. Hurford Training Phonemic Segmentation Ability with a Phonemic Discrimination Intervention in Second- and Third-Grade Children with Reading Disabilities , 1990, Journal of learning disabilities.

[18]  Ingvar Lundberg,et al.  Effects of an Extensive Program for Stimulating Phonological Awareness in Preschool Children. , 1988 .

[19]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Word recognition processes of poor and disabled readers: Do they necessarily differ? , 1985, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[20]  Lynette Bradley,et al.  Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling , 1985 .

[21]  Why We Do Not Need Intelligence Test Scores in the Definition and Analyses of Learning Disabilities , 1989, Journal of learning disabilities.

[22]  Linnea C. Ehri,et al.  The mnemonic value of orthography among beginning readers. , 1979 .

[23]  Mary Rohl,et al.  Phonological Awareness and Reading Acquisition , 1991 .

[24]  J. Torgesen,et al.  Why IQ Is Relevant to the Definition of Learning Disabilities , 1989, Journal of learning disabilities.

[25]  L. Siegel An Evaluation of the Discrepancy Definition of Dyslexia , 1992, Journal of learning disabilities.

[26]  R. Treiman,et al.  Phonemic-analysis training helps children benefit from spelling-sound rules , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[27]  Philip B. Gough,et al.  Decoding, Reading, and Reading Disability , 1986 .