Adaptive Sky: From Instrument Pixels to a Sensor Web Gestalt

A variety of sensors have been developed and deployed to monitor the Earth, ranging from in situ seismographic networks to hyperspectral imaging instruments carried onboard NASA satellites. Despite an impressive collection of sensing assets, there is still much untapped potential, as evidenced by the limited number of studies that successfully employ high-resolution data from multiple instruments. Sensor webs offer the potential to go beyond simple data fusion by dynamically combining sensing assets into coordinated, multi-instrument observers of specific geophysical objects, phenomena, and processes. In this paper, we describe Adaptive Sky, an algorithm package for sensor webs developed through funding from the NASA Earth Science Technology Office under the Advanced Information Systems Technology program. Fundamentally, Adaptive Sky aims to relate the observations from one sensor at time t to the observations from another sensor at time t', providing a “gestalt,” or unified, perspective that is more than the sum of its parts. A scenario involving the eruption of Bezymianny Volcano on the remote Kamchatka Peninsula on 14 October 2007 demonstrates conceptually how Adaptive Sky can be leveraged to create unprecedented spatio-temporal and phenomenological coverage of a complex geophysical event of interest, despite limitations inherent in the individual sensors.

[1]  William I. Rose,et al.  Retrieval of sizes and total masses of particles in volcanic clouds using AVHRR bands 4 and 5 , 1994 .

[2]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Jan Flusser,et al.  Image registration methods: a survey , 2003, Image Vis. Comput..

[4]  Michael J. Garay,et al.  Adaptive Sky sensor web: Novel multi-instrument, multi-satellite observations of volcanic ash clouds , 2008 .

[5]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C (2nd ed.): the art of scientific computing , 1992 .

[6]  R. Sherwood,et al.  Sensor Web Technologies for NASA Earth Science , 2008, 2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[7]  Anshuman Razdan,et al.  Geometric Calibration of Digital Cameras for 3D Cumulus Cloud Measurements , 2009 .

[8]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[9]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Object based image analysis for remote sensing , 2010 .

[10]  Michael J. Garay,et al.  The aerosol measurement and processing system and applications to African studies , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[11]  Michael D. King,et al.  The Earth Observing System: A Space-based Program for Assessing Mankind's Impact on the Global Environment , 1995 .

[12]  W. Menzel,et al.  Introducing GOES-I: The First of a New Generation of Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites , 1994 .

[13]  Michael C. Burl,et al.  Mining Patters of Activity from Video Data , 2004, SDM.

[14]  Kevin A. Delin The Sensor Web: A Macro-Instrument for Coordinated Sensing , 2002 .

[15]  Yi Wang,et al.  Adaptive Sky: A Feature Correspondence Toolbox for a Multi-Instrument, Multi-Platform Distributed Cloud Monitoring Sensor Web , 2008, 2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[16]  C Smith,et al.  Operational calibration of Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite-8 and-9 imagers and sounders. , 1997, Applied optics.

[17]  Jiri Matas,et al.  Robust wide-baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions , 2004, Image Vis. Comput..

[18]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[19]  Kirk Martinez,et al.  Environmental Sensor Networks: A revolution in the earth system science? , 2006 .

[20]  Yi Wang,et al.  Generation of Object-Centric Datasets with Adaptive Sky , 2008 .

[21]  Steve H. L. Liang,et al.  A distributed geospatial infrastructure for Sensor Web , 2005, Comput. Geosci..

[22]  D. Morton,et al.  Validation of GOES and MODIS active fire detection products using ASTER and ETM+ data , 2008 .

[23]  Rick Damiani,et al.  The Cumulus, Photogrammetric, In Situ, and Doppler Observations Experiment of 2006 , 2008 .

[24]  David C. Pieri,et al.  The February 2001 Eruption of Mount Cleveland, Alaska: Case Study of an Aviation Hazard , 2002 .

[25]  Jon Louis Bentley,et al.  Quad trees a data structure for retrieval on composite keys , 1974, Acta Informatica.

[26]  David C. Pieri,et al.  Analysis of active volcanoes from the earth observing system , 1991 .

[27]  Jack Dongarra,et al.  Performance of LAPACK: a portable library of numerical linear algebra routines , 1992, Proc. IEEE.

[28]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[29]  Gregory Leptoukh,et al.  Giovanni: A Web Service Workflow-Based Data Visualization and Analysis System , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[30]  Jeroen Tromp,et al.  The global seismographic network surpasses its design goal , 2004 .

[31]  Dominic Mazzoni,et al.  GENESIS SciFlo: Scientific Knowledge Creation on the Grid using a Semantically-Enabled Dataflow Execution Environment , 2005, International Conference on Statistical and Scientific Database Management.