A shear instability seeding mechanism for quasiperiodic radar echoes

The quasiperiodic echoes with periods in the range of ∼ 1–10 minutes originally discovered at the Middle and Upper Atmosphere (MU) radar in Japan in the early 1990s are now known to be a common feature of midlatitude sporadic E. A possible role of shear instabilities and the associated Kelvin-Helmholtz structure in seeding the plasma instabilities that produce the radar echoes is suggested in this paper. The proposed mechanism has the advantage that the seed structure is generated in situ as part of the same neutral wind structure that serves to initiate the generation of the sporadic E layer. In addition, the range of observed periods can easily be explained. Since the Kelvin-Helmholtz structure is embedded in the shear flow and moves with the mean flow in the shear layer, the period observed in the ground-based frame is simply a product of the horizontal wavelength and the mean flow velocity at the center of the disturbance. Finally, a typical feature of the radar observations has been that the quasiperiodic structure often ebbs and wanes in intensity over a period of 30 to perhaps 60 min. Recent simulations of unstable neutral shears show that the timescale for the build up and eventual restabilization of the shear flow is 30–40 min, comparable to the timescale found in the observations.

[1]  V. Nesterov,et al.  A discussion on D and E region winds over Europe - Wind profiles from artificial luminous cloud observations and the theory of Es formation based on wind shear , 1972, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[2]  M. Yamamoto,et al.  Comparison of E‐region electric fields observed with a sounding rocket and a Doppler radar in the Seek Campaign , 1998 .

[3]  David C. Fritts,et al.  Evolution and breakdown of Kelvin-Helmholtz billows in stratified compressible flows. Part I: Comparison of two- and three-dimensional flows , 1996 .

[4]  M. Kelley,et al.  A wind‐driven gradient drift mechanism for mid‐latitude E‐region ionospheric irregularities , 1998 .

[5]  L. Smith,et al.  Incoherent scatter radar observations of irregular structure in mid‐latitude sporadic E layers , 1978 .

[6]  M. Yamamoto,et al.  First observations of quasi‐periodic radar echoes from Stanford, California , 1999 .

[7]  L. Smith,et al.  Sporadic-E layers and unstable wind shears , 1980 .

[8]  Mamoru Yamamoto,et al.  Gravity wave modulation of gradient drift instabilities in mid-latitude sporadic E irregularities , 1991 .

[9]  S. Chandrasekhar.  Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability , 1961 .

[10]  H. Hayakawa,et al.  The SEEK (Sporadic‐E Experiment over Kyushu) Campaign , 1998 .

[11]  D. Hysell,et al.  HF radar observations of quasiperiodic E layer echoes over North America , 1999 .

[12]  M. Yamamoto,et al.  A morphological study on mid-latitude E-region field-aligned irregularities observed with the MU radar , 1992 .

[13]  M. Larsen,et al.  The SEEK Chemical Release Experiment: Observed neutral wind profile in a region of sporadic E , 1998 .

[14]  J. Whitehead.  Production and prediction of sporadic E , 1970 .

[15]  K. Yeh,et al.  Acoustic‐gravity waves in the upper atmosphere , 1974 .

[16]  N. Rosenberg.  Statistical analysis of ionospheric winds--II , 1968 .

[17]  C. J. Pan,et al.  Quasi‐periodic echoes observed with the Chung‐Li VHF Radar during the SEEK Campaign , 1998 .

[18]  Mamoru Yamamoto,et al.  On the origin of quasi‐periodic radar backscatter from midlatitude sporadic E , 1994 .

[19]  D. A. Carter,et al.  Gradient drift irregularities in mid‐latitude sporadic E , 1981 .

[20]  Mamoru Yamamoto,et al.  Mid‐latitude E region field‐aligned irregularities observed with the MU radar , 1991 .

[21]  A. Hedin.  MSIS‐86 Thermospheric Model , 1987 .

[22]  J. Chau,et al.  Low‐latitude quasiperiodic echoes observed with the Piura VHF Radar in the E region , 1999 .

[23]  Donald T. Farley,et al.  Radar Studies of Long-Wavelength Waves Associated With Mid-Latitude Sporadic E Layers , 1986 .