Does Pregnancy Affect Refractive and Corneal Stability or Corneal Epithelial Remodeling After Myopic LASIK?

PURPOSE To investigate possible refractive changes in pregnant women who have previously undergone myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS This prospective study included 64 pregnant women (128 eyes) who had previously undergone bilateral myopic LASIK. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), spherical equivalent, corneal keratometry, topography and tomography, and epithelial mapping were evaluated before LASIK, 12 months after LASIK, during the third trimester of pregnancy, and 1 year postpartum. RESULTS The average age at the time of recruitment was 32.5 ± 5 years (range: 24.5 to 39.5 years). The evaluation during pregnancy was at an average 55 months (range: 12 to 108 months) from the initial LASIK procedure. The preoperative mean refractive error was -6.72 ± 2.96 diopters (D) (range: -1.00 to -11.00 D). Comparing 12-month refractive data after the original LASIK procedure to the those within the third trimester of the subsequent pregnancy, the average UDVA was 20/18, the residual refractive error was -0.63 ± 1.00 to -0.51 ± 0.82 D, the steepest keratometry value was 40.85 ± 1.89 to 40.88 ± 2.84 D, and the central epithelial thickness was 56.4 ± 3.89 to 57.38 ± 5.04 µm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In this study, pregnancy did not affect the refractive stability of LASIK. Pregnancy-related changes in refractive error, corneal stability, and total corneal and epithelial thickness in women after LASIK were not found to be statistically significant. [J Refract Surg. 2022;36(2):118-122.].

[1]  A. Kanellopoulos,et al.  In pursuit of objective dry eye screening clinical techniques , 2016, Eye and Vision.

[2]  A. Kanellopoulos,et al.  Epithelial remodeling following myopic LASIK. , 2014, Journal of refractive surgery.

[3]  A. Kanellopoulos,et al.  Optical coherence tomography–derived corneal thickness asymmetry indices: Clinical reference study of normal eyes , 2014, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  A. Kanellopoulos,et al.  Comparison of high-resolution Scheimpflug and high-frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy to anterior-segment OCT corneal thickness measurements , 2013, Clinical ophthalmology.

[5]  A. Pellicer,et al.  [Influence of pregnancy on refractive parameters after LASIK surgery]. , 2012, Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia.

[6]  H. Iseli,et al.  Pregnancy-related exacerbation of iatrogenic keratectasia despite corneal collagen crosslinking. , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[7]  Michael J Lynn,et al.  Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[8]  P. Oszukowski,et al.  [Ocular changes during pregnancy]. , 2005, Ginekologia polska.

[9]  Y. Akar,et al.  Effect of Pregnancy on Intraobserver and Intertechnique Agreement in Intraocular Pressure Measurements , 2005, Ophthalmologica.

[10]  Donald C. Chang,et al.  Potential role of disrupted lacrimal acinar cells in dry eye during pregnancy. , 2000, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[11]  S Kinoshita,et al.  Expression of sex steroid hormone receptors in human cornea , 2001, Current eye research.

[12]  J. Aquavella,et al.  The effect of pregnancy on corneal curvature. , 1992, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[13]  R. Weinreb,et al.  Maternal corneal thickness during pregnancy. , 1988, American journal of ophthalmology-glaucoma.

[14]  P. Riss,et al.  Corneal sensitivity in pregnancy. , 1981, Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde.