Knowing Chinese character grammar

Chinese character structure has often been described as representing a kind of grammar, but the notion of character grammar has hardly been explored. Patterns in character element reduplication are particularly grammar-like, displaying discrete combinatoriality, binarity, phonology-like final prominence, and potentially the need for symbolic rules (X→XX). To test knowledge of these patterns, Chinese readers were asked to judge the acceptability of fake characters varying both in grammaticality (obeying or violating reduplication constraints) and in lexicality (of the reduplicative configurations). While lexical knowledge was important (lexicality improved acceptability and grammatical configurations were accepted more quickly when also lexical), grammatical knowledge was important as well, with grammaticality improving acceptability equally for lexical and nonlexical configurations. Acceptability was also higher for more frequent reduplicative elements, suggesting that the reduplicative configurations were decomposed. Chinese characters present an as-yet untapped resource for exploring fundamental questions about the nature of the human capacity for grammar.

[1]  S. Pinker,et al.  On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition , 1988, Cognition.

[2]  Colin Phillips,et al.  Relating structure and time in linguistics and psycholinguistics , 2007 .

[3]  James Myers,et al.  Syntactic Judgment Experiments , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[4]  Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini,et al.  Still a bridge too far? Biolinguistic questions for grounding language on brains , 2008 .

[5]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[6]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  Steven Brown,et al.  The Origins of Music: Edited by Nils L. Wallin, Björn Merker, and Steven Brown, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2000, xii+ 498 pages, ISBN 0-262-23206-5, US$60.00 , 2000 .

[8]  Laurie Feldman,et al.  The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics: The Chinese character in psycholinguistic research: form, structure, and the reader , 2006 .

[9]  Omar Hammad,et al.  Prosodic Morphology , 2007 .

[10]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Lexical processing in Spanish Sign Language (LSE) , 2008 .

[11]  Jan Edwards,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Lengthenings and shortenings and the nature of prosodic constituency , 1990 .

[12]  G. Fanselow,et al.  On the Informativity of Different Measures of Linguistic Acceptability , 2011 .

[13]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  S. Yeh,et al.  Role of structure and component in judgments of visual similarity of Chinese characters. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Jason Chia-Sheng Wang.  Toward a generative grammar of Chinese character structure and stroke order , 1983 .

[16]  C. F. Hockett.  The origin of speech. , 1960, Scientific American.

[17]  Chu-Ren Huang,et al.  Segmentation Standard for Chinese Natural Language Processing , 1996, COLING.

[18]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does the evidence rule out? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  Hsuan-Chih Chen,et al.  The Visual Word Form Area: Evidence from an fMRI study of implicit processing of Chinese characters , 2008, NeuroImage.

[20]  Cécile Fougeron,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Laboratory Phonology , 2011 .

[21]  W. Sandler.  A sonority cycle in American Sign Language , 1993, Phonology.

[22]  Jonathan Westley Peirce,et al.  Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using PsychoPy , 2008, Front. Neuroinform..

[23]  Diane Brentari,et al.  A Prosodic Model of Sign Language Phonology , 1999 .

[24]  J. Hanley,et al.  Phonological awareness and visual skills in learning to read Chinese and English , 1995, Cognition.

[25]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The unique role of the visual word form area in reading , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  S. Pinker,et al.  The past and future of the past tense , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  D. Robert Ladd,et al.  Simultaneous Structure in Phonology , 2014 .

[28]  William L. Abler,et al.  On the particulate principle of self-diversifying systems , 1989 .

[29]  W. Tecumseh Fitch,et al.  Visual artificial grammar learning: comparative research on humans, kea (Nestor notabilis) and pigeons (Columba livia) , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  W. Kuo,et al.  Cognitive and neural basis of the consistency and lexicality effects in reading Chinese , 2010, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[31]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[32]  Todd M. Bailey,et al.  Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? , 2001 .

[33]  Janet Hui-wen Hsiao,et al.  The perception of simplified and traditional Chinese characters in the eye of simplified and traditional Chinese readers , 2012, CogSci.

[34]  Gang Peng,et al.  Cultural background influences the liminal perception of Chinese characters: An ERP study , 2010, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[35]  Matthew Gordon,et al.  A Factorial Typology of Quantity-Insensitive Stress , 2002 .

[36]  J. Ehrich,et al.  Acquiring an Artificial Logographic Orthography , 2009 .

[37]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  The Constituency Model of Chinese Word Identification , 1999 .

[38]  Chia-Ying Lee,et al.  Orthographic combinability and phonological consistency effects in reading Chinese phonograms: An event-related potential study , 2009, Brain and Language.

[39]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Positional Specificity of Radicals in Chinese Character Recognition , 1999 .

[40]  Veronika Mattes,et al.  Studies on reduplication , 2005 .

[41]  Richard Sproat,et al.  Book Reviews: A Computational Theory of Writing Systems , 2006, CL.

[42]  Diane Brentari,et al.  Phonological reduplication in sign language: Rules rule , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[43]  Jianyu Li,et al.  Chinese character structure analysis based on complex networks , 2007 .

[44]  S. Kawahara.  Experimental Approaches in Theoretical Phonology , 2011 .

[45]  Ariel M. Cohen-Goldberg,et al.  Lexical access in sign language: a computational model , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[46]  J. Myers.  Markedness and Lexical Typicality in Mandarin Acceptability Judgments , 2015 .

[47]  Ovid J. L. Tzeng,et al.  Dyslexia across languages : orthography and the brain-gene-behavior link , 2011 .

[48]  Jenn-Yeu Chen,et al.  The proximate unit in Chinese handwritten character production , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[49]  Terezinha Nunes,et al.  Children's understanding of the formal and functional characteristics of written Chinese , 1998, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[50]  Barbara J Knowlton,et al.  Visual feature learning in artificial grammar classification. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[51]  Sascha Topolinski,et al.  The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[52]  M. Aronoff,et al.  The Paradox of Sign Language Morphology , 2005, Language.

[53]  D. Mirman,et al.  Competition and cooperation among similar representations: toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. , 2012, Psychological review.