Workload in a provincial New Zealand vascular surgery service.

AIM There is increasing evidence that centralising complex surgical procedures improves mortality rates. The focus on mortality as the primary outcome measure overlooks every other aspect of a local surgical service that could be lost by centralisation. The aim of this audit was to assess the total vascular service provided in a provincial vascular surgical unit METHOD This was a 12-month prospective audit of the vascular surgical service in Taranaki. All outpatient and inpatient vascular consultations and procedures carried out by a surgeon or interventional radiologist were identified. RESULTS There were 181 inpatient admissions of which 121 (67%) were elective and 60 (33%) acute. There were 41 (29%) non-operative admissions, while 140 (71%) required an operation as an inpatient. There were 967 total bed days for vascular patients with an average stay of 5 days (4-6 95% CI). There were 588 vascular outpatient consultations for 396 patients. There were 201 (34%) new patient visits and 387 (66%) follow up appointments. CONCLUSION Although the number of operations performed per population per year in Taranaki over the audit period was consistent with other reports, the number of major vascular cases did not meet suggested annual thresholds for minimising mortality. Despite this there was no evidence of increased mortality in any group. There was a large amount of non operative work which is not considered when focus is exclusively on mortality.

[1]  D. Bramley,et al.  Trends in incidence and mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm in New Zealand , 2011, The British journal of surgery.

[2]  A. Karthikesalingam,et al.  Centralization Harnessing Volume-Outcome Relationships in Vascular Surgery and Aortic Aneurysm Care Should Not Focus Solely on Threshold Operative Caseload , 2010, Vascular and endovascular surgery.

[3]  Justin B Dimick,et al.  Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Matthew J. Thompson,et al.  Model for the reconfiguration of specialized vascular services , 2008, The British journal of surgery.

[5]  R. Gibberd,et al.  EVALUATION OF SURGICAL PERFORMANCE USING V‐POSSUM RISK‐ADJUSTED MORTALITY RATES , 2008, ANZ journal of surgery.

[6]  T. Magee,et al.  Vascular surgery within general surgery: an analysis of workload 1989-2005. , 2007, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[7]  J. Michaels,et al.  Does volume directly affect outcome in vascular surgical procedures? , 2007, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[8]  G. Hamilton,et al.  Vascular surgery by numbers. , 2007, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[9]  Matthew J. Thompson,et al.  Meta-analysis and systematic review of the relationship between hospital volume and outcome following carotid endarterectomy. , 2007, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[10]  S. Vallance RS03
VASCULAR SURGERY IN A RURAL PRACTICE – THE CASE FOR , 2007 .

[11]  Azeem Majeed,et al.  Use of administrative data or clinical databases as predictors of risk of death in hospital: comparison of models , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  Matthew J. Thompson,et al.  Epidemiological study of the relationship between volume and outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in the UK from 2000 to 2005 , 2007, The British journal of surgery.

[13]  Matthew J. Thompson,et al.  Meta‐analysis and systematic review of the relationship between volume and outcome in abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery , 2007, The British journal of surgery.

[14]  A. Jibawi,et al.  Is there a minimum caseload that achieves acceptable operative mortality in abdominal aortic aneurysm operations? , 2006, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[15]  N. Wright,et al.  Poor access to care: rural health deprivation? , 2006, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[16]  T. Magee,et al.  Changes in the provision of vascular surgery in a single health region over 10 years. , 2005, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[17]  A. Davies,et al.  Implications of ITU bed non-availability and the centralisation of vascular services in the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Current U.K. practice. , 2002, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery.

[18]  P. Shackley,et al.  Vascular patients' preferences for local treatment: an application of conjoint analysis , 2001, Journal of health services research & policy.

[19]  R F Nease,et al.  Patient preferences for location of care: implications for regionalization. , 1999, Medical care.

[20]  R. Kester,et al.  Audit of vascular surgical workload: use of data for service development. , 1996, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.