Simulations and process analysis of the carbonation–calcination reaction process with intermediate hydration

Abstract Several technologies are currently being developed to separate carbon dioxide from large point sources, such as coal-fired power plants. An emerging technology that shows great potential is a calcium oxide–calcium carbonate cycle. A major drawback is the calcium carbonate decreases in reactivity over multiple cycles. The Ohio State University demonstrated in 2008 the first carbonation–calcination reaction (CCR) process that includes intermediate hydration for sorbent regeneration and its feasibility over multiple cycles at the 120 kW th scale with actual flue gas from coal combustion. The CCR Process utilizes a calcium-based sorbent to react with the carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide in a flue gas stream to form calcium carbonate and calcium sulfate, respectively. The carbon dioxide is subsequently released from the calcium carbonate to produce a high-purity, sequestration-ready carbon dioxide stream while regenerating the calcium oxide sorbent. The sulfur dioxide is fixated as calcium sulfate and removed through a purge stream. An intermediate hydration step restores reactivity to the calcium oxide sorbent. Process analysis from computer simulations shows the CCR Process to be highly effective and efficient in removing both carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide at low energy penalties under realistic conditions. A 20–22% decrease in electricity generation efficiency with the CCR Process is expected, compared with amine scrubbing around 27% and oxy-combustion around 25% energy penalty. A 25–28% increase in thermal energy with the CCR Process is expected to maintain a constant electrical output. Further, the CCR Process consumes half the oxygen necessary for an oxy-combustion plant and 25% less steam necessary for amine scrubbing.

[1]  G. H. Babcock,et al.  Steam / its generation and use , 1972 .

[2]  Raghubir P. Gupta,et al.  The dry carbonate process: Carbon dioxide recovery from power plant flue gas , 2009 .

[3]  K. Chrissafis,et al.  The effect of sintering on the maximum capture efficiency of CO2 using a carbonation/calcination cycle of carbonate rocks , 2005 .

[4]  Wallace B. Smith,et al.  A five-stage cyclone system for in situ sampling. , 1979 .

[5]  Akwasi A. Boateng,et al.  Rotary Kilns: Transport Phenomena and Transport Processes , 2006 .

[6]  Christopher W. Jones,et al.  Adsorbent materials for carbon dioxide capture from large anthropogenic point sources. , 2009, ChemSusChem.

[7]  Yong Wang,et al.  The effects of steam and carbon dioxide on calcite decomposition using dynamic X-ray diffraction , 1995 .

[8]  Liang-Shih Fan,et al.  Chemical Looping Systems for Fossil Energy Conversions , 2010 .

[9]  L. Romeo,et al.  Optimizing make-up flow in a CO2 capture system using CaO , 2009 .

[10]  C. Wolters,et al.  SCHUMACHER HOT GAS FILTER LONG-TERM OPERATING EXPERIENCE in the NUON POWER BUGGENUM IGCC POWER PLANT , 2002 .

[11]  Masahiro Kato,et al.  Carbon dioxide absorption by lithium orthosilicate in a wide range of temperature and carbon dioxide concentrations , 2002 .

[12]  B. R. Stanmore,et al.  Review—calcination and carbonation of limestone during thermal cycling for CO2 sequestration , 2005 .

[13]  B. Gullett,et al.  Comparative SO2 reactivity of CaO derived from CaCo3 and Ca(OH)2 , 1989 .

[14]  F. Zeman.  Effect of steam hydration on performance of lime sorbent for CO2 capture , 2008 .

[15]  Paul S. Fennell,et al.  The calcium looping cycle for large-scale CO2 capture , 2010 .

[16]  Yukishige Maezawa,et al.  Novel CO2 Absorbents Using Lithium‐Containing Oxide , 2005 .

[17]  Craig Hawthorne,et al.  Simulation of the carbonate looping power cycle , 2009 .

[18]  Juan Carlos Abanades,et al.  Economics of CO2 Capture Using the Calcium Cycle with a Pressurized Fluidized Bed Combustor , 2007 .

[19]  P. Fennell,et al.  Regeneration of sintered limestone sorbents for the sequestration of CO2 from combustion and other systems , 2007 .

[20]  Yunhan Xiao,et al.  Steam catalysis in CaO carbonation under low steam partial pressure , 2008 .

[21]  William Wang.  Experimental Results and Computer Simulations for Post-Combustion Carbon Dioxide Removal Using Limestone , 2009 .

[22]  Stephan Gleis,et al.  Cyclic Carbonation Calcination Studies of Limestone and Dolomite for CO2 Separation From Combustion Flue Gases , 2009 .

[23]  K. Essaki,et al.  Absorption and Stripping of CO2 with a Molten Salt Slurry in a Bubble Column at High Temperature , 2006 .

[24]  Jean-Pierre Tranier,et al.  Air separation, flue gas compression and purification units for oxy-coal combustion systems , 2009 .

[25]  R. B. Slimane,et al.  Progress in carbon dioxide separation and capture: a review. , 2008, Journal of environmental sciences.

[26]  J. N. Kim,et al.  Properties of Ca-Base CO2 Sorbent Using Ca(OH)2 as Precursor , 2007 .

[27]  J. C. Abanades.  The maximum capture efficiency of CO2 using a carbonation/calcination cycle of CaO/CaCO3 , 2002 .

[28]  Liang-Shih Fan,et al.  Clean coal conversion processes – progress and challenges , 2008 .

[29]  D. Beruto,et al.  Calcium oxides of high reactivity , 1976, Nature.

[30]  Vasilije Manovic,et al.  Steam hydration of sorbents from a dual fluidized bed CO2 looping cycle reactor , 2008 .

[31]  Michael X. Jiang,et al.  Flue Gas Desulfurization Technologies for Coal-Fired Power Plants , 2000 .

[32]  Liang-Shih Fan,et al.  Subpilot Demonstration of the Carbonation−Calcination Reaction (CCR) Process: High-Temperature CO2 and Sulfur Capture from Coal-Fired Power Plants , 2010 .

[33]  A. Sánchez-Biezma,et al.  Oxyfuel carbonation/calcination cycle for low cost CO2 capture in existing power plants , 2008 .

[34]  Himanshu Gupta,et al.  Kinetics and Structural Characterization of Calcium-Based Sorbents Calcined under Subatmospheric Conditions for the High-Temperature CO2 Capture Process , 2007 .

[35]  James T. Murphy,et al.  Capturing Carbon from Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants , 2009 .

[36]  Changsui Zhao,et al.  Calcination and sintering characteristics of limestone under O2/CO2 combustion atmosphere , 2007 .

[37]  John R. Grace,et al.  The effect of CaO sintering on cyclic CO2 capture in energy systems , 2007 .

[38]  Richard E. Waryasz,et al.  ECONOMICS AND FEASIBILITY OF RANKINE CYCLE IMPROVEMENTS FOR COAL FIRED POWER PLANTS , 2004 .

[39]  J. Carlos Abanades,et al.  CO2 Capture Capacity of CaO in Long Series of Carbonation/Calcination Cycles , 2006 .

[40]  J. C. Abanades,et al.  Cost structure of a postcombustion CO2 capture system using CaO. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.