Modeling Influence of Soil Properties in Different Gradients of Soil Moisture: The Case of the Valencia Anchor Station Validation Site, Spain

The prediction of spatial and temporal variation of soil water content brings numerous benefits in the studies of soil. However, it requires a considerable number of covariates to be included in the study, complicating the analysis. Integrated nested Laplace approximations (INLA) with stochastic partial differential equation (SPDE) methodology is a possible approach that allows the inclusion of covariates in an easy way. The current study has been conducted using INLA-SPDE to study soil moisture in the area of the Valencia Anchor Station (VAS), soil moisture validation site for the European Space Agency SMOS (Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity). The data used were collected in a typical ecosystem of the semiarid Mediterranean conditions, subdivided into physio-hydrological units (SMOS units) which presents a certain degree of internal uniformity with respect to hydrological parameters and capture the spatial and temporal variation of soil moisture at the local fine scale. The paper advances the knowledge of the influence of hydrodynamic properties on VAS soil moisture (texture, porosity/bulk density and soil organic matter and land use). With the goal of understanding the factors that affect the variability of soil moisture in the SMOS pixel (50 km × 50 km), five states of soil moisture are proposed. We observed that the model with all covariates and spatial effect has the lowest DIC value. In addition, the correlation coefficient was close to 1 for the relationship between observed and predicted values. The methodology applied presents the possibility to analyze the significance of different covariates having spatial and temporal effects. This process is substantially faster and more effective than traditional kriging. The findings of this study demonstrate an advancement in that framework, demonstrating that it is faster than previous methodologies, provides significance of individual covariates, is reproducible, and is easy to compare with models.

[1]  Jan Seibert,et al.  Using landscape characteristics to define an adjusted distance metric for improving kriging interpolations , 2010, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[2]  L. Alletto,et al.  Temporal and spatial variability of soil bulk density and near-saturated hydraulic conductivity under two contrasted tillage management systems , 2009 .

[3]  Y. Kerr,et al.  Modelling soil moisture at SMOS scale by use of a SVAT model over the Valencia Anchor Station , 2010 .

[4]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Using remotely-sensed estimates of soil moisture to infer soil texture and hydraulic properties across a semi-arid watershed , 2007 .

[5]  Yann Kerr,et al.  Soil moisture retrieval from space: the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  H. Rue,et al.  An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach , 2011 .

[7]  Henry Lin,et al.  Soil moisture patterns in a forested catchment: A hydropedological perspective , 2006 .

[8]  Anthony N. Pettitt,et al.  Comment on the paper: ‘Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations’ by Rue, H. Martino, S. and Chopin, N. , 2009 .

[9]  Pablo Juan Verdoy.  Spatio-temporal hierarchical Bayesian analysis of wildfires with Stochastic Partial Differential Equations. A case study from Valencian Community (Spain) , 2020 .

[10]  S. Prasher,et al.  Evaluation of pedotransfer functions in predicting the soil water contents at field capacity and wilting point , 2004 .

[11]  H. Bormann,et al.  Seasonal and land use dependent variability of soil hydraulic and soil hydrological properties of two Northern German soils , 2008 .

[12]  E. Zehe,et al.  Soil moisture: variable in space but redundant in time , 2020 .

[13]  G. Lannoy,et al.  SMOS-IC data record of soil moisture and L-VOD: Historical development, applications and perspectives , 2021, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[14]  Arnaud Mialon,et al.  Soil moisture modelling of a SMOS pixel: interest of using the PERSIANN database over the Valencia Anchor Station , 2010 .

[15]  R. Singh,et al.  Spatial distribution of soil hydro-physical properties and morphometric analysis of a rainfed watershed as a tool for sustainable land use planning , 2009 .

[16]  Annamaria Castrignanò,et al.  Studying the spatial structure evolution of soil water content using multivariate geostatistics , 2005 .

[17]  Y. Kerr.  Soil moisture from space: Where are we? , 2007 .

[18]  B. Minasny,et al.  Spatiotemporal modelling of soil organic matter changes in Jiangsu, China between 1980 and 2006 using INLA-SPDE , 2021, Geoderma.

[19]  M. Baghini,et al.  A critical review of soil moisture measurement , 2014 .

[20]  Luca Brocca,et al.  Soil Moisture for Hydrological Applications: Open Questions and New Opportunities , 2017 .

[21]  Pablo Juan Verdoy.  Enhancing the SPDE modeling of spatial point processes with INLA, applied to wildfires. Choosing the best mesh for each database , 2019, Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation.

[22]  T. Mayr,et al.  Identification of key soil and terrain properties that influence the spatial variability of soil moisture throughout the growing season , 2009 .

[23]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Large scale measurements of soil moisture for validation of remotely sensed data: Georgia soil moisture experiment of 2003☆ , 2006 .

[24]  G. O. Awe,et al.  Capacity and intensity soil aeration properties affected by granulometry, moisture, and structure in no-tillage soils , 2016 .

[25]  Dimitri Hendriks,et al.  Applying transfer function-noise modelling to characterize soil moisture dynamics: a data-driven approach using remote sensing data , 2020, Environ. Model. Softw..