Influence of abilities on performance during practice: Effects of massed and distributed practice.

Prior research indicates that the influence of abilities on performance may change as a function of practice. The present research examined how learning styles influence the relationship between abilities and task performance. The styles examined were massed versus distributed practice. Two hundred nine Ss were asked to complete measures of spatial visualization and perceptual speed. They then practiced a complex skill acquisition task for 4 hr under conditions that allowed them to pace their rate of practice. Analysis of several dependent measures revealed that perceptual speed contributed to task performance for Ss who massed their practice (n = 33), whereas spatial visualization contributed to performance for Ss who distributed their practice (n = 61)

[1]  M. Mumford,et al.  Personality Variables and Skill Acquisition: Performance While Practicing a Complex Task , 1993 .

[2]  M. Mumford,et al.  Personality, Adaptability, and Performance: Performance on Well-Defined Problem Sovling Tasks , 1993 .

[3]  A. Reber.  Implicit learning and tacit knowledge , 1993 .

[4]  Craig J. Russell,et al.  Moderated Regression Analysis and Likert Scales: Too Coarse for Comfort , 1992 .

[5]  Edwin A. Fleishman,et al.  Handbook of human abilities: Definitions, measurements, and job task requirements. , 1992 .

[6]  G. Phye.  Inductive Problem Solving: Schema Inducement and Memory-Based Transfer. , 1990 .

[7]  John A. Glover,et al.  Massed versus distributed repeated reading: A case of forgetting helping recall? , 1990 .

[8]  C. Schooler.  Twenty One – Psychosocial Factors and Effective Cognitive Functioning in Adulthood , 1990 .

[9]  Gary D. Phye,et al.  Schemata Training and Transfer of an Intellectual Skill. , 1989 .

[10]  Phillip L. Ackerman,et al.  Within-task intercorrelations of skilled performance: Implications for predicting individual differences? A comment on Henry & Hulin, 1987. , 1989 .

[11]  P. Ackerman.  Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. , 1988 .

[12]  John Clement,et al.  Observed Methods for Generating Analogies in Scientific Problem Solving , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  M. Chi,et al.  The Nature of Expertise , 1988 .

[14]  R. Glaser,et al.  Expertise in a complex skill: Diagnosing x-ray pictures. , 1988 .

[15]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning To Solve Problems. Technical Report No. 9. , 1987 .

[16]  Frederick Reif,et al.  Interpretation of scientific or mathematical concepts: Cognitive issues and instructional implications ** , 1987 .

[17]  P. Ackerman.  Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. , 1987 .

[18]  Philip A. Vernon,et al.  New developments in reaction time research. , 1987 .

[19]  Frank N. Dempster.  Time and the Production of Classroom Learning: discerning Implications From Basic Research , 1987 .

[20]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Automatic and controlled processing theory and its applications to human factors problems , 1987 .

[21]  James Reason,et al.  Cognitive Aids in Process Environments: Prostheses or Tools? , 1987, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[22]  P. Hancock.  Human Factors Psychology , 1987 .

[23]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Cognitive science and military training. , 1986 .

[24]  P. Ackerman.  Individual differences in information processing: An investigation of intellectual abilities and task performance during practice ☆ , 1986 .

[25]  D. Gentner,et al.  Systematicity and Surface Similarity in the Development of Analogy. Technical Report No. 358. , 1985 .

[26]  Spero A. Metalis.  Effects of Massed versus Distributed Practice on Acquisition of Video Game Skill , 1985 .

[27]  M. Gettinger,et al.  Differences in student performance on knowledge, comprehension, and application tasks : implications for school learning , 1985 .

[28]  Vito Modigliani,et al.  The effect of expanded versus massed practice on the retention of multiplication facts and spelling lists. , 1985 .

[29]  Ernst Z. Rothkopf,et al.  Contextual Enrichment and Distribution of Practice in the Classroom , 1984 .

[30]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Handbook of human intelligence , 1984 .

[31]  Peter Johnson,et al.  8 – The Acquisition of Skill , 1984 .

[32]  R. Snow,et al.  Lecture 2: Toward a Theory of Cognitive Aptitude for Learning from Instruction , 1984 .

[33]  Laurie A. Broedling,et al.  Taxonomies of Human Performance: The Description of Human Tasks , 1984 .

[34]  Pat-Anthony Federico,et al.  Changes in The Cognitive Components of Achievement as Students Proceed through Computer-Managed Instruction. , 1983 .

[35]  Edwin A. Fleishman,et al.  Systems for describing human tasks. , 1982 .

[36]  R. Clark.  Antagonism Between Achievement and Enjoyment in ATI Studies , 1982 .

[37]  Pat-Anthony Federico.  Individual Differences in Cognitive Characteristics and Computer-Managed Mastery Learning. , 1982 .

[38]  Kristine C. Bloom,et al.  Effects of Massed and Distributed Practice on the Learning and Retention of Second-Language Vocabulary , 1981 .

[39]  Distribution of Practice and Pre-Task Ability in the Acquisition of Three Discrete Gross Motor Skills , 1980 .

[40]  Ronald R. Schmeck,et al.  Academic Achievement and Individual Differences in Learning Processes , 1979 .

[41]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Handbook of the Psychology of Aging , 1979 .

[42]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions , 1977 .

[43]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[44]  P Dunham.  Distribution of practice as a factor affecting learning and/or performance. , 1976, Journal of motor behavior.

[45]  Douglas C. Chatfield,et al.  Response Availability as a Function of Massed and Distributed Practice and List Differentiation , 1976 .

[46]  J. Ivancevich.  Predicting job performance by use of ability tests and studying job satisfaction as a moderating variable , 1976 .

[47]  Macy L. Abrams,et al.  Effects of Practice and Positional Variables in Acquisition of a Complex Psychomotor Skill , 1976, Perceptual and motor skills.

[48]  E. A. Fleishman,et al.  Toward a Taxonomy of Human Performance. , 1975 .

[49]  G. R. Wheaton,et al.  Methods for Predicting Job-Ability Requirements: IV. Task Characteristics, Ability Requirements, and Problem-Solving Strategies. , 1975 .

[50]  M. Schwartz.  The effect of constant vs. varied encoding and massed vs. distributed presentations on recall of paired associates , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[51]  H. F. Jarrett,et al.  The Relation of Past Managerial Achievement to Test Measures Obtained in the Employment Situation: Methodology and Results-II. , 1973 .

[52]  Edwin A. Fleishman,et al.  On the relation between abilities, learning, and human performance. , 1972 .

[53]  E. A. Fleishman,et al.  Prediction of transfer and other learning phenomena from ability and personality measures. , 1969, Journal of educational psychology.

[54]  Mary L. Tenopyr.  THE COMPARATIVE VALIDITY OF SELECTED LEADERSHIP SCALES RELATIVE TO SUCCESS IN PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT , 1969 .

[55]  E. A. Fleishman,et al.  Role of kinesthetic and spatialvisual abilities in perceptual-motor learning. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[56]  E A FLEISHMAN,et al.  Factors in the retention and relearning of perceptual-motor skill. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[57]  L. Siegel.  Employee Aptitude Survey. , 1958 .

[58]  Edwin A. Fleishman,et al.  Changes in factor structure of a complex psychomotor test as a function of practice , 1954 .

[59]  L. Tyler.  The psychology of human differences. , 1947 .

[60]  C. Hood,et al.  Education and Intelligence. , 1912 .