A holistic review of applied methodologies for assessing and selecting the optimal technological alternative from a sustainability perspective
暂无分享,去创建一个
Valeria Ibáñez-Forés | María D. Bovea | Victoria Pérez-Belis | M. Bovea | V. Ibáñez-Forés | V. Perez-Belis | V. Pérez-Belis
[1] David Pearce,et al. Environmental Policy Benefits: Monetary Valuation , 1989 .
[2] Réjean Samson,et al. Implications of choices and interpretation in LCA for multi-criteria process design: de-inked pulp capacity and cogeneration at a paper mill case study , 2009 .
[3] W J De Lange,et al. Incorporating stakeholder preferences in the selection of technologies for using invasive alien plants as a bio-energy feedstock: applying the analytical hierarchy process. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.
[4] Yasushi Inoue,et al. Two-scale evaluation of remediation technologies for a contaminated site by applying economic input-output life cycle assessment: risk-cost, risk-energy consumption and risk-CO2 emission. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.
[5] Krisztina Cziner,et al. Multicriteria decision making in process integration , 2005 .
[6] D. Štreimikienė,et al. Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach , 2012 .
[7] A. Henriksen,et al. A technology assessment primer for management of technology , 1997 .
[8] Darja B. Žarković,et al. Simple and cost-effective measures for the improvement of paper mill effluent treatment – A case study , 2011 .
[9] Neven Duić,et al. Selection of sustainable technologies for combustion of Bosnian coals , 2010 .
[10] J. M. Samuels,et al. Financial management and decision making , 1998 .
[11] Harald Schoenberger. Lignite coke moving bed adsorber for cement plants - BAT or beyond BAT? , 2011 .
[12] Martin Treitz,et al. Adapting the European approach of Best Available Techniques: case studies from Chile and China , 2008 .
[13] Maurizio Cellura,et al. Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology , 2003 .
[14] Zongguo Wen,et al. Best available techniques and pollution control: a case study on China’s thermal power industry , 2012 .
[15] M. S. García-Cascales,et al. Decision support in disinfection technologies for treated wastewater reuse , 2009 .
[16] K. F. van der Woerd,et al. MIOW+, Achtergrond bij het model , 1996 .
[17] E. F Wolstenholme,et al. The use of system dynamics as a tool for intermediate level technology evaluation: three case studies , 2003 .
[18] Naim Afgan,et al. Multi-criteria evaluation of hydrogen and natural gas fuelled power plant technologies , 2009 .
[19] D. A. Georgakellos. Environmental Assessment Of TechnologyInvestments Using The LCA Polygon Framework , 2006 .
[20] Leo Breedveld,et al. Eco-efficiency of fabric filters in the Italian ceramic tile industry , 2007 .
[21] T. Bhatti,et al. Justification of manufacturing technology capital investment-an integrated approach , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology. ICMIT 2000. 'Management in the 21st Century' (Cat. No.00EX457).
[22] José Ramón San Cristóbal,et al. A multi criteria data envelopment analysis model to evaluate the efficiency of the Renewable Energy technologies , 2011 .
[23] Yongchang Li,et al. An Intelligent Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Systems Design , 2010 .
[24] Naim Afgan,et al. Sustainability assessment of hydrogen energy systems , 2004 .
[25] Robert P. Vignes. Use limited life-cycle analysis for environmental decision-making , 2001 .
[26] A. Chaloulakou,et al. Evaluation of the implementation of best available techniques in IPPC context: an environmental performance indicators approach. , 2009 .
[27] John Psarras,et al. Supporting sustainable electricity technologies in Greece using MCDM , 2006 .
[28] Maarten Gelderman,et al. The relation between user satisfaction, usage of information systems and performance , 1998, Inf. Manag..
[29] Walter Klöpffer,et al. Life cycle assessment , 1997, Environmental science and pollution research international.
[30] Allan Afuah. How much do your co-opetitors' capabilities matter in the face of technological change? , 2000 .
[31] Marta Herva,et al. Review of combined approaches and multi-criteria analysis for corporate environmental evaluation , 2013 .
[32] Brian Veitch,et al. Evaluating offshore technologies for produced water management using GreenPro-I - a risk-based life cycle analysis for green and clean process selection and design , 2005, Comput. Chem. Eng..
[33] An Derden,et al. Best available techniques (BAT) for the fruit and vegetable processing industry , 2002 .
[34] Cengiz Kahraman,et al. A Hierarchy Grey Relational Analysis for Selecting the Renewable Electricity Generation Technologies , 2011 .
[35] J. Deng,et al. Introduction to Grey system theory , 1989 .
[36] W. Edwards,et al. Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .
[37] M T Torres Rodríguez,et al. Combining LCT tools for the optimization of an industrial process: material and energy flow analysis and best available techniques. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.
[38] Herman Steyn,et al. Selection of renewable energy technologies for Africa: Eight case studies in Rwanda, Tanzania and Malawi , 2011 .
[39] Antonio Marcomini,et al. Decision Support–Oriented Selection of Remediation Technologies to Rehabilitate Contaminated Sites , 2006, Integrated environmental assessment and management.
[40] Fausto Cavallaro,et al. Multi-criteria decision aid to assess concentrated solar thermal technologies , 2009 .
[41] Otto Rentz,et al. Integrated technique assessment with imprecise information as a support for the identification of best available techniques (BAT) , 2001, OR Spectr..
[42] Jiangjiang Wang,et al. A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for trigeneration system , 2008 .
[43] Alan C. Brent,et al. A conceptual framework for energy technology sustainability assessment , 2011 .
[44] V. Hontou,et al. BEAsT: a decision-support tool for assessing the environmental benefits and the economic attractiveness of best available techniques in industry , 2008 .
[45] Q. Z. Yang,et al. A Matrix Evaluation Model for Sustainability Assessment of Manufacturing Technologies , 2009 .
[46] Lucio Grandinetti,et al. A niched genetic algorithm to solve a pollutant emission reduction problem in the manufacturing industry: A case study , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..
[47] George Mavrotas,et al. An integrated approach for the selection of Best Available Techniques (BAT) for the industries in the greater Athens area using multi-objective combinatorial optimization , 2007 .
[48] Ward Edwards,et al. How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decisionmaking , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
[49] Ching-Lai Hwang,et al. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.
[50] Matthias Ehrgott,et al. Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .
[51] P. Vincke,et al. Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making , 1985 .
[52] M. Ramachandran,et al. Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning--A review , 2004 .
[53] Guohe Huang,et al. Assessment of cleaner production options for alcohol industry of China: a study in the Shouguang Alcohol Factory , 2004 .
[54] Marion Tobler,et al. EU COST Action 628: life cycle assessment (LCA) of textile products, eco-efficiency and definition of best available technology (BAT) of textile processing , 2007 .
[55] W. Souder,et al. The risk pyramid for new product development: An application to complex aerospace hardware , 1993 .
[56] Peter Glavič,et al. Fuzzy Logic Model for the performance benchmarking of sugar plants by considering best available techniques , 2007 .
[57] Jiangjiang Wang,et al. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making , 2009 .
[58] Naim Afgan,et al. Multi-criteria evaluation for CHP system options , 2006 .
[59] He Xu,et al. Comparison of end-of-life tire treatment technologies: a Chinese case study. , 2010, Waste management.
[60] R Lahdelma,et al. Using Multicriteria Methods in Environmental Planning and Management , 2000, Environmental management.
[61] Pablo Aragonés-Beltrán,et al. The application of the analytic network process to the assessment of best available techniques , 2012 .
[62] Sonia Fernández González,et al. Análisis y evaluación del riesgo ambiental , 2006 .
[63] Michael Tow Cheung,et al. Internet-based e-banking and consumer attitudes: an empirical study , 2002, Inf. Manag..
[64] Alan C. Brent,et al. Determining the most important factors for sustainable energy technology selection in Africa: Application of the focus group technique , 2008 .
[65] G E Apostolakis,et al. Application of risk assessment and decision analysis to the evaluation, ranking and selection of environmental remediation alternatives. , 2000, Journal of hazardous materials.
[66] Tugrul U. Daim,et al. A taxonomic review of methods and tools applied in technology assessment , 2008 .
[67] R. S. Laundy,et al. Multiple Criteria Optimisation: Theory, Computation and Application , 1989 .
[68] Adisa Azapagic,et al. Indicators of Sustainable Development for Industry: A General Framework , 2000 .
[69] Sanja Vranes,et al. Decision support tool for used oil regeneration technologies assessment and selection. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.
[70] W. Edwards. How to Use Multi-Attribute Utility Measurement for Social Decision Making , 1976 .
[71] Naim Afgan,et al. Sustainability assessment tool for the decision making in selection of energy system—Bosnian case , 2007 .
[72] Nicolás Pardo,et al. The potential for improvements in energy efficiency and CO2 emissions in the EU27 cement industry and the relationship with the capital budgeting decision criteria , 2011 .
[73] Caterina Rinaldi,et al. Methodology for Life Cycle Assessment of Ceramic Floor and Wall Tiles - Applications in BAT Definition for Ceramic Tiles Industry , 2001 .
[74] Igor Linkov,et al. Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.
[75] Norberto García,et al. Economic and Environmental Assessment of Alternatives to the Extraction of Acetic Acid from Water , 2011 .
[76] Cengiz Kahraman,et al. Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Theory and Applications with Recent Developments , 2008 .
[77] F. Vollenbroek,et al. Sustainable development and the challenge of innovation , 2002 .
[78] D. Huntzinger,et al. A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies , 2009 .
[79] Adisa Azapagic,et al. Determination of 'best available techniques' for integrated pollution prevention and control: A life cycle approach , 2000 .
[80] Lawrence M. Seiford,et al. Recent developments in dea : the mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis , 1990 .
[81] Otto Rentz,et al. Using quality function deployment for technique selection for optimum environmental performance improvement , 2001 .
[82] R. L. Keeney,et al. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
[83] Tugrul U. Daim,et al. A framework for technology assessment: Case of a Thai building material manufacturer , 2009 .
[84] Laurence Guichard,et al. Ex ante assessment of the sustainability of alternative cropping systems: implications for using multi-criteria decision-aid methods. A review , 2011, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.
[85] Min Xu,et al. Optimization of wastewater treatment alternative selection by hierarchy grey relational analysis. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.
[86] Benito Navarrete,et al. Assessment performance of high-temperature filtering elements , 2010 .
[87] Thierry Bréchet,et al. Beyond BAT: selecting optimal combinations of available techniques, with an example from the limestone industry. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.
[88] María D. Bovea,et al. Environmental performance of ceramic tiles: Improvement proposals , 2010 .
[89] Luc Int Panis,et al. ExternE Externalities of Energy Methodology 2005 Update , 2013 .
[90] Thomas L. Saaty,et al. Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .
[91] T. Saaty,et al. The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .
[92] Peter C. Fishburn,et al. Utility theory for decision making , 1970 .
[93] Tadeusz Fijał,et al. An environmental assessment method for cleaner production technologies , 2007 .
[94] Otto Rentz,et al. The reference installation approach for the techno-economic assessment of emission abatement options and the determination of bat according to the IPPC-directive , 2000 .
[95] Elena Comino,et al. Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Analytic Network Process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..
[96] Yung Chi Shen,et al. A collaborative model for technology evaluation and decision-making , 2010 .
[97] David V. Budescu,et al. DIFFERENTIAL WEIGHTING OF MULTIPLE CHOICE ITEMS , 1979 .
[98] Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez,et al. Optimization of global and local pollution control in electricity production from coal burning , 2012 .
[99] T. Ramsha Prabhu,et al. Technology choice using FHDM: a case of iron-making technology , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.
[100] Seth D. Guikema,et al. Sensitivity analysis for multi‐attribute system selection problems in onshore Environmentally Friendly Drilling (EFD) , 2012, Syst. Eng..
[101] Jacques Pictet,et al. Multiple criteria decision analysis of treatment and land-filling technologies for waste incineration residues , 2008 .
[102] Thomas D. Waite,et al. Life Cycle Assessment of Water Recycling Technology , 2005 .
[103] D. Huybrechts,et al. SOX Emission Reduction In TheCeramic Industry: BAT And Beyond , 2007 .
[104] D. Kocoaglu,et al. Technology selection in brownfields redevelopment , 2001, PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199).
[105] Neff Walker,et al. A classification of visual representations , 1994, CACM.
[106] Theodor J. Stewart,et al. Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .
[107] Carles M. Gasol,et al. Implementation of best available techniques in cement manufacturing: a life-cycle assessment study , 2012 .
[108] Stefano Tarantola,et al. Tools for Composite Indicators Building , 2005 .
[109] Ove T. Gudmestad,et al. The IPPC directive and technique qualification at offshore oil and gas installations , 2011 .
[110] Tahir Husain,et al. Evaluation of Drinking Water Treatment Technology: An Entropy-Based Fuzzy Application , 2006 .
[111] Gabriela Fernandez Sanchez. Análisis de la sostenibilidad agraria mediante indicadores sintéticos: aplicación empírica para sistemas agrarios de Castilla y León , 2009 .
[112] Eliseo Monfort,et al. Diffuse PM10 emission factors associated with dust abatement technologies in the ceramic industry , 2011 .
[113] Murray Turoff,et al. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .
[114] Helen E. Muga,et al. Sustainability of wastewater treatment technologies. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.
[115] Walter Kloepffer,et al. Life cycle sustainability assessment of products , 2008 .
[116] Otto Rentz,et al. A methodological approach for the economic assessment of best available techniques demonstrated for a case study from the steel industry , 2001 .
[117] Abraham Charnes,et al. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .
[118] Michael Freudenberg,et al. Composite Indicators of Country Performance: A Critical Assessment , 2003 .
[119] Stefan Hajkowicz,et al. A Review of Multiple Criteria Analysis for Water Resource Planning and Management , 2007 .
[120] William J. Kolarik,et al. Life cycle costing: Concept and practice , 1981 .
[121] R Dijkmans,et al. Methodology for selection of best available techniques (BAT) at the sector level , 2000 .
[122] Franco Gugliermetti,et al. PROPOSED CRITERIA TO SELECT BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES (BATS) FOR OIL SPILL RESPONSE , 2009 .
[123] Gjalt Huppes,et al. Developing an LCA guide for decision support , 2001 .
[124] Göran Finnveden,et al. Weighting and valuation in selected environmental systems analysis tools - suggestions for further developments , 2011 .
[125] G Perkoulidis,et al. A multi-criteria ranking of different technologies for the anaerobic digestion for energy recovery of the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes. , 2009, Bioresource technology.
[126] Raffaella Manzini,et al. Quick and dirty technology assessment: The case of an Italian Research Centre , 2008 .
[127] Adisa Azapagic,et al. Assessing the sustainability of Best Available Techniques (BAT): Methodology and application in the ceramic tiles industry , 2013 .
[128] Robert Phaal,et al. From theory to practice: challenges in operationalising a technology selection framework , 2006 .