A holistic review of applied methodologies for assessing and selecting the optimal technological alternative from a sustainability perspective

Assessing and selecting the optimal technological alternatives in industrial sector is a fundamental tool to improve and adapt the industrial processes to the European legislation, which encourages the incorporation of new technologies for minimising the environmental impacts of companies such as Best Available Techniques. The aim of this study is to perform a holistic analysis of this process from a sustainability perspective. That is to say, its purpose is to analyse the studies that have been published in the literature over the last decade concerning the way the different improvements incorporated into different industrial sectors (Best Available Techniques, green technologies, remediation technologies, emission abatement technologies, etc.) are assessed and selected from a range of perspectives (environmental, technical, economic, social, etc.). Thus, an extensive review of the literature was performed to determine which criteria are the most widely used, the methodologies applied to choose those criteria, the sources of information the data is obtained from, the methodologies for calculating the indicators that allow each criterion to be measured, the different normalising and weighting methods that are applied, the techniques that are most commonly used to compare and choose the best technological alternatives and, finally, the sensitivity analyses that are most often applied to such processes. As a result, the process for assessing and selecting technologies is characterised and the guidelines to direct the selection of the set of methodologies that are the most appropriate to make a decision related to technology selection in future applications are established.

[1]  David Pearce,et al.  Environmental Policy Benefits: Monetary Valuation , 1989 .

[2]  Réjean Samson,et al.  Implications of choices and interpretation in LCA for multi-criteria process design: de-inked pulp capacity and cogeneration at a paper mill case study , 2009 .

[3]  W J De Lange,et al.  Incorporating stakeholder preferences in the selection of technologies for using invasive alien plants as a bio-energy feedstock: applying the analytical hierarchy process. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  Yasushi Inoue,et al.  Two-scale evaluation of remediation technologies for a contaminated site by applying economic input-output life cycle assessment: risk-cost, risk-energy consumption and risk-CO2 emission. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[5]  Krisztina Cziner,et al.  Multicriteria decision making in process integration , 2005 .

[6]  D. Štreimikienė,et al.  Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach , 2012 .

[7]  A. Henriksen,et al.  A technology assessment primer for management of technology , 1997 .

[8]  Darja B. Žarković,et al.  Simple and cost-effective measures for the improvement of paper mill effluent treatment – A case study , 2011 .

[9]  Neven Duić,et al.  Selection of sustainable technologies for combustion of Bosnian coals , 2010 .

[10]  J. M. Samuels,et al.  Financial management and decision making , 1998 .

[11]  Harald Schoenberger Lignite coke moving bed adsorber for cement plants - BAT or beyond BAT? , 2011 .

[12]  Martin Treitz,et al.  Adapting the European approach of Best Available Techniques: case studies from Chile and China , 2008 .

[13]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology , 2003 .

[14]  Zongguo Wen,et al.  Best available techniques and pollution control: a case study on China’s thermal power industry , 2012 .

[15]  M. S. García-Cascales,et al.  Decision support in disinfection technologies for treated wastewater reuse , 2009 .

[16]  K. F. van der Woerd,et al.  MIOW+, Achtergrond bij het model , 1996 .

[17]  E. F Wolstenholme,et al.  The use of system dynamics as a tool for intermediate level technology evaluation: three case studies , 2003 .

[18]  Naim Afgan,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation of hydrogen and natural gas fuelled power plant technologies , 2009 .

[19]  D. A. Georgakellos Environmental Assessment Of TechnologyInvestments Using The LCA Polygon Framework , 2006 .

[20]  Leo Breedveld,et al.  Eco-efficiency of fabric filters in the Italian ceramic tile industry , 2007 .

[21]  T. Bhatti,et al.  Justification of manufacturing technology capital investment-an integrated approach , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology. ICMIT 2000. 'Management in the 21st Century' (Cat. No.00EX457).

[22]  José Ramón San Cristóbal,et al.  A multi criteria data envelopment analysis model to evaluate the efficiency of the Renewable Energy technologies , 2011 .

[23]  Yongchang Li,et al.  An Intelligent Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Systems Design , 2010 .

[24]  Naim Afgan,et al.  Sustainability assessment of hydrogen energy systems , 2004 .

[25]  Robert P. Vignes Use limited life-cycle analysis for environmental decision-making , 2001 .

[26]  A. Chaloulakou,et al.  Evaluation of the implementation of best available techniques in IPPC context: an environmental performance indicators approach. , 2009 .

[27]  John Psarras,et al.  Supporting sustainable electricity technologies in Greece using MCDM , 2006 .

[28]  Maarten Gelderman,et al.  The relation between user satisfaction, usage of information systems and performance , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[29]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life cycle assessment , 1997, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[30]  Allan Afuah How much do your co-opetitors' capabilities matter in the face of technological change? , 2000 .

[31]  Marta Herva,et al.  Review of combined approaches and multi-criteria analysis for corporate environmental evaluation , 2013 .

[32]  Brian Veitch,et al.  Evaluating offshore technologies for produced water management using GreenPro-I - a risk-based life cycle analysis for green and clean process selection and design , 2005, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[33]  An Derden,et al.  Best available techniques (BAT) for the fruit and vegetable processing industry , 2002 .

[34]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  A Hierarchy Grey Relational Analysis for Selecting the Renewable Electricity Generation Technologies , 2011 .

[35]  J. Deng,et al.  Introduction to Grey system theory , 1989 .

[36]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .

[37]  M T Torres Rodríguez,et al.  Combining LCT tools for the optimization of an industrial process: material and energy flow analysis and best available techniques. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[38]  Herman Steyn,et al.  Selection of renewable energy technologies for Africa: Eight case studies in Rwanda, Tanzania and Malawi , 2011 .

[39]  Antonio Marcomini,et al.  Decision Support–Oriented Selection of Remediation Technologies to Rehabilitate Contaminated Sites , 2006, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[40]  Fausto Cavallaro,et al.  Multi-criteria decision aid to assess concentrated solar thermal technologies , 2009 .

[41]  Otto Rentz,et al.  Integrated technique assessment with imprecise information as a support for the identification of best available techniques (BAT) , 2001, OR Spectr..

[42]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for trigeneration system , 2008 .

[43]  Alan C. Brent,et al.  A conceptual framework for energy technology sustainability assessment , 2011 .

[44]  V. Hontou,et al.  BEAsT: a decision-support tool for assessing the environmental benefits and the economic attractiveness of best available techniques in industry , 2008 .

[45]  Q. Z. Yang,et al.  A Matrix Evaluation Model for Sustainability Assessment of Manufacturing Technologies , 2009 .

[46]  Lucio Grandinetti,et al.  A niched genetic algorithm to solve a pollutant emission reduction problem in the manufacturing industry: A case study , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[47]  George Mavrotas,et al.  An integrated approach for the selection of Best Available Techniques (BAT) for the industries in the greater Athens area using multi-objective combinatorial optimization , 2007 .

[48]  Ward Edwards,et al.  How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decisionmaking , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[49]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[50]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[51]  P. Vincke,et al.  Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making , 1985 .

[52]  M. Ramachandran,et al.  Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning--A review , 2004 .

[53]  Guohe Huang,et al.  Assessment of cleaner production options for alcohol industry of China: a study in the Shouguang Alcohol Factory , 2004 .

[54]  Marion Tobler,et al.  EU COST Action 628: life cycle assessment (LCA) of textile products, eco-efficiency and definition of best available technology (BAT) of textile processing , 2007 .

[55]  W. Souder,et al.  The risk pyramid for new product development: An application to complex aerospace hardware , 1993 .

[56]  Peter Glavič,et al.  Fuzzy Logic Model for the performance benchmarking of sugar plants by considering best available techniques , 2007 .

[57]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making , 2009 .

[58]  Naim Afgan,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation for CHP system options , 2006 .

[59]  He Xu,et al.  Comparison of end-of-life tire treatment technologies: a Chinese case study. , 2010, Waste management.

[60]  R Lahdelma,et al.  Using Multicriteria Methods in Environmental Planning and Management , 2000, Environmental management.

[61]  Pablo Aragonés-Beltrán,et al.  The application of the analytic network process to the assessment of best available techniques , 2012 .

[62]  Sonia Fernández González,et al.  Análisis y evaluación del riesgo ambiental , 2006 .

[63]  Michael Tow Cheung,et al.  Internet-based e-banking and consumer attitudes: an empirical study , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[64]  Alan C. Brent,et al.  Determining the most important factors for sustainable energy technology selection in Africa: Application of the focus group technique , 2008 .

[65]  G E Apostolakis,et al.  Application of risk assessment and decision analysis to the evaluation, ranking and selection of environmental remediation alternatives. , 2000, Journal of hazardous materials.

[66]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  A taxonomic review of methods and tools applied in technology assessment , 2008 .

[67]  R. S. Laundy,et al.  Multiple Criteria Optimisation: Theory, Computation and Application , 1989 .

[68]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Indicators of Sustainable Development for Industry: A General Framework , 2000 .

[69]  Sanja Vranes,et al.  Decision support tool for used oil regeneration technologies assessment and selection. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[70]  W. Edwards How to Use Multi-Attribute Utility Measurement for Social Decision Making , 1976 .

[71]  Naim Afgan,et al.  Sustainability assessment tool for the decision making in selection of energy system—Bosnian case , 2007 .

[72]  Nicolás Pardo,et al.  The potential for improvements in energy efficiency and CO2 emissions in the EU27 cement industry and the relationship with the capital budgeting decision criteria , 2011 .

[73]  Caterina Rinaldi,et al.  Methodology for Life Cycle Assessment of Ceramic Floor and Wall Tiles - Applications in BAT Definition for Ceramic Tiles Industry , 2001 .

[74]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[75]  Norberto García,et al.  Economic and Environmental Assessment of Alternatives to the Extraction of Acetic Acid from Water , 2011 .

[76]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Theory and Applications with Recent Developments , 2008 .

[77]  F. Vollenbroek,et al.  Sustainable development and the challenge of innovation , 2002 .

[78]  D. Huntzinger,et al.  A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies , 2009 .

[79]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Determination of 'best available techniques' for integrated pollution prevention and control: A life cycle approach , 2000 .

[80]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Recent developments in dea : the mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis , 1990 .

[81]  Otto Rentz,et al.  Using quality function deployment for technique selection for optimum environmental performance improvement , 2001 .

[82]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[83]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  A framework for technology assessment: Case of a Thai building material manufacturer , 2009 .

[84]  Laurence Guichard,et al.  Ex ante assessment of the sustainability of alternative cropping systems: implications for using multi-criteria decision-aid methods. A review , 2011, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[85]  Min Xu,et al.  Optimization of wastewater treatment alternative selection by hierarchy grey relational analysis. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[86]  Benito Navarrete,et al.  Assessment performance of high-temperature filtering elements , 2010 .

[87]  Thierry Bréchet,et al.  Beyond BAT: selecting optimal combinations of available techniques, with an example from the limestone industry. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[88]  María D. Bovea,et al.  Environmental performance of ceramic tiles: Improvement proposals , 2010 .

[89]  Luc Int Panis,et al.  ExternE Externalities of Energy Methodology 2005 Update , 2013 .

[90]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[91]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[92]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Utility theory for decision making , 1970 .

[93]  Tadeusz Fijał,et al.  An environmental assessment method for cleaner production technologies , 2007 .

[94]  Otto Rentz,et al.  The reference installation approach for the techno-economic assessment of emission abatement options and the determination of bat according to the IPPC-directive , 2000 .

[95]  Elena Comino,et al.  Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Analytic Network Process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[96]  Yung Chi Shen,et al.  A collaborative model for technology evaluation and decision-making , 2010 .

[97]  David V. Budescu,et al.  DIFFERENTIAL WEIGHTING OF MULTIPLE CHOICE ITEMS , 1979 .

[98]  Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez,et al.  Optimization of global and local pollution control in electricity production from coal burning , 2012 .

[99]  T. Ramsha Prabhu,et al.  Technology choice using FHDM: a case of iron-making technology , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[100]  Seth D. Guikema,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for multi‐attribute system selection problems in onshore Environmentally Friendly Drilling (EFD) , 2012, Syst. Eng..

[101]  Jacques Pictet,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis of treatment and land-filling technologies for waste incineration residues , 2008 .

[102]  Thomas D. Waite,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Water Recycling Technology , 2005 .

[103]  D. Huybrechts,et al.  SOX Emission Reduction In TheCeramic Industry: BAT And Beyond , 2007 .

[104]  D. Kocoaglu,et al.  Technology selection in brownfields redevelopment , 2001, PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199).

[105]  Neff Walker,et al.  A classification of visual representations , 1994, CACM.

[106]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[107]  Carles M. Gasol,et al.  Implementation of best available techniques in cement manufacturing: a life-cycle assessment study , 2012 .

[108]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Tools for Composite Indicators Building , 2005 .

[109]  Ove T. Gudmestad,et al.  The IPPC directive and technique qualification at offshore oil and gas installations , 2011 .

[110]  Tahir Husain,et al.  Evaluation of Drinking Water Treatment Technology: An Entropy-Based Fuzzy Application , 2006 .

[111]  Gabriela Fernandez Sanchez Análisis de la sostenibilidad agraria mediante indicadores sintéticos: aplicación empírica para sistemas agrarios de Castilla y León , 2009 .

[112]  Eliseo Monfort,et al.  Diffuse PM10 emission factors associated with dust abatement technologies in the ceramic industry , 2011 .

[113]  Murray Turoff,et al.  The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .

[114]  Helen E. Muga,et al.  Sustainability of wastewater treatment technologies. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[115]  Walter Kloepffer,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment of products , 2008 .

[116]  Otto Rentz,et al.  A methodological approach for the economic assessment of best available techniques demonstrated for a case study from the steel industry , 2001 .

[117]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[118]  Michael Freudenberg,et al.  Composite Indicators of Country Performance: A Critical Assessment , 2003 .

[119]  Stefan Hajkowicz,et al.  A Review of Multiple Criteria Analysis for Water Resource Planning and Management , 2007 .

[120]  William J. Kolarik,et al.  Life cycle costing: Concept and practice , 1981 .

[121]  R Dijkmans,et al.  Methodology for selection of best available techniques (BAT) at the sector level , 2000 .

[122]  Franco Gugliermetti,et al.  PROPOSED CRITERIA TO SELECT BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES (BATS) FOR OIL SPILL RESPONSE , 2009 .

[123]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Developing an LCA guide for decision support , 2001 .

[124]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Weighting and valuation in selected environmental systems analysis tools - suggestions for further developments , 2011 .

[125]  G Perkoulidis,et al.  A multi-criteria ranking of different technologies for the anaerobic digestion for energy recovery of the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[126]  Raffaella Manzini,et al.  Quick and dirty technology assessment: The case of an Italian Research Centre , 2008 .

[127]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Assessing the sustainability of Best Available Techniques (BAT): Methodology and application in the ceramic tiles industry , 2013 .

[128]  Robert Phaal,et al.  From theory to practice: challenges in operationalising a technology selection framework , 2006 .