Tracheal intubation in patients with rigid collar immobilisation of the cervical spine: a comparison of Airtraq® and LMA CTrach™ devices *

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Airtraq® and CTrach™ in lean patients with simulated cervical spine injury after application of a rigid cervical collar. Eighty‐six consenting adult patients of ASA physical status 1 or 2, who required elective tracheal intubation were included in this study in a randomised manner. Anaesthesia was induced using 1 μg.kg−1 fentanyl, 3 mg.kg−1 propofol and 0.6 mg.kg−1 rocuronium, following which a rigid cervical collar was applied. Comparison was then made between tracheal intubation techniques using either the AirTraq or CTrach device. The mean (SD) time to see the glottis was shorter with the Airtraq than the CTrach (11.9 (6.8) vs 37.6 (16.7)s, respectively; p < 0.001). The mean (SD) time taken for tracheal intubation was also shorter with the Airtraq than the CTrach (25.6 (13.5) and 66.3 (29.3)s, respectively; p < 0.001). There was less mucosal damage in the Airtraq group (p = 0.008). Our findings demonstrate that use of the Airtraq device shortened the tracheal intubation time and reduced the mucosal damage when compared with the CTrach in patients who require cervical spine immobilisation.

[1]  Lorri A. Lee,et al.  Closed claims' analysis. , 2011, Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology.

[2]  R. Strauss,et al.  Management of the Difficult Airway , 2010 .

[3]  H. Sugimoto,et al.  A comparison of cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airtraq® or Macintosh laryngoscopes * , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[4]  J. Laffey,et al.  Evaluation of the Airtraq® and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients at increased risk for difficult tracheal intubation* , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[5]  R. Amathieu,et al.  Tracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients: a randomized trial comparing performance of Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes. , 2008, British journal of anaesthesia.

[6]  R. Amathieu,et al.  A comparison of two techniques for inserting the Airtraq™ laryngoscope in morbidly obese patients , 2007, Anaesthesia.

[7]  A. Nileshwar,et al.  Comparison of intubating laryngeal mask airway and Bullard laryngoscope for oro-tracheal intubation in adult patients with simulated limitation of cervical movements. , 2007, British journal of anaesthesia.

[8]  J. Laffey,et al.  Endotracheal Intubation in Patients with Cervical Spine Immobilization: A Comparison of Macintosh and Airtraq Laryngoscopes , 2007, Anesthesiology.

[9]  R. Amathieu,et al.  Tracheal intubation using the Airtraq in morbid obese patients undergoing emergency cesarean delivery. , 2007, Anesthesiology.

[10]  X. Combes,et al.  Tracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients: LMA CTrach vs direct laryngoscopy. , 2006, British journal of anaesthesia.

[11]  J. Laffey,et al.  A comparison of tracheal intubation using the Airtraq® or the Macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway management: a randomised, controlled clinical trial , 2006, Anaesthesia.

[12]  W. Rosenblatt,et al.  The LMA CTrachTM in airway resuscitation: six case reports , 2006, Anaesthesia.

[13]  W. Rosenblatt,et al.  The fiberoptic Intubating LMA-CTrach: an initial device evaluation. , 2006, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[14]  M. Bozkurt,et al.  Tracheal intubation using the ILMA, C‐TrachTM or McCoy laryngoscope in patients with simulated cervical spine injury , 2006, Anaesthesia.

[15]  F. Xue,et al.  Comparative study of hemodynamic responses to orotra- cheal intubation with intubating laryngeal mask airway and direct laryngoscope , 2006 .

[16]  J. Laffey,et al.  Evaluation of intubation using the Airtraq® or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy – a manikin study * , 2006, Anaesthesia.

[17]  S. Russo,et al.  LMA CTrach™ , 2006, Der Anaesthesist.

[18]  C. E. Bjerkelund.  Use of a new intubating laryngeal mask – CTrach™– in patients with known difficult airways , 2006, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[19]  E. Liu,et al.  The LMA CTrach, a new laryngeal mask airway for endotracheal intubation under vision: evaluation in 100 patients. , 2006, British journal of anaesthesia.

[20]  F. Xue,et al.  Comparative study of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with intubating laryngeal mask airway. , 2006, Chinese medical journal.

[21]  S. Russo,et al.  [LMA CTrach: initial experiences in patients with difficult-to-manage airways]. , 2006, Der Anaesthesist.

[22]  C. Goutcher,et al.  Reduction in mouth opening with semi-rigid cervical collars. , 2005, British journal of anaesthesia.

[23]  T. Mort,et al.  Esophageal intubation with indirect clinical tests during emergency tracheal intubation: a report on patient morbidity. , 2005, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[24]  M. Ozaki,et al.  Intubating laryngeal mask airway allows tracheal intubation when the cervical spine is immobilized by a rigid collar. , 2004, British journal of anaesthesia.

[25]  T. Mort,et al.  Emergency Tracheal Intubation: Complications Associated with Repeated Laryngoscopic Attempts , 2004, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[26]  K. Shingu,et al.  Ease of tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask during manual in‐line head and neck stabilisation , 2000, Anaesthesia.

[27]  D. Gabbott.  Laryngoscopy using the McCoy laryngoscope after application of a cervical collar , 1996, Anaesthesia.

[28]  K. Heath.  The effect on laryngoscopy of different cervical spine immobilization techniques , 1994, Anaesthesia.

[29]  S. Kapral,et al.  Excursions of the cervical spine during tracheal intubation: blind oral intubation compared with direct laryngoscopy , 1994, Anaesthesia.

[30]  S. Kelley,et al.  Neurologic deterioration associated with airway management in a cervical spine-injured patient. , 1993, Anesthesiology.

[31]  R S Cormack,et al.  Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics , 1983, Anaesthesia.