Science and Curation Considerations for the Design of a Mars Sample Return (MSR) Sample Receiving Facility.

The most important single element of the "ground system" portion of a Mars Sample Return (MSR) Campaign is a facility referred to as the Sample Receiving Facility (SRF), which would need to be designed and equipped to receive the returned spacecraft, extract and open the sealed sample container, extract the samples from the sample tubes, and implement a set of evaluations and analyses of the samples. One of the main findings of the first MSR Sample Planning Group (MSPG, 2019a) states that "The scientific community, for reasons of scientific quality, cost, and timeliness, strongly prefers that as many sample-related investigations as possible be performed in PI-led laboratories outside containment." There are many scientific and technical reasons for this preference, including the ability to utilize advanced and customized instrumentation that may be difficult to reproduce inside in a biocontained facility, and the ability to allow multiple science investigators in different labs to perform similar or complementary analyses to confirm the reproducibility and accuracy of results. It is also reasonable to assume that there will be a desire for the SRF to be as efficient and economical as possible, while still enabling the objectives of MSR to be achieved. For these reasons, MSPG concluded, and MSPG2 agrees, that the SRF should be designed to accommodate only those analytical activities that could not reasonably be done in outside laboratories because they are time- or sterilization-sensitive, are necessary for the Sample Safety Assessment Protocol (SSAP), or are necessary parts of the initial sample characterization process that would allow subsamples to be effectively allocated for investigation. All of this must be accommodated in an SRF, while preserving the scientific value of the samples through maintenance of strict environmental and contamination control standards.

[1]  D. Beaty,et al.  Time-Sensitive Aspects of Mars Sample Return (MSR) Science. , 2021, Astrobiology.

[2]  D. Beaty,et al.  Preliminary Planning for Mars Sample Return (MSR) Curation Activities in a Sample Receiving Facility. , 2021, Astrobiology.

[3]  D. Beaty,et al.  Planning Implications Related to Sterilization-Sensitive Science Investigations Associated with Mars Sample Return (MSR). , 2021, Astrobiology.

[4]  D. Beaty,et al.  The Scientific Importance of Returning Airfall Dust as a Part of Mars Sample Return (MSR). , 2021, Astrobiology.

[5]  D. Beaty,et al.  Rationale and Proposed Design for a Mars Sample Return (MSR) Science Program. , 2021, Astrobiology.

[6]  D. Beaty,et al.  Final Report of the MSR Science Planning Group 2 (MSPG2). , 2021, Astrobiology.

[7]  A. Harrington,et al.  Tours of high-containment and pristine facilities in support of Mars Sample Return (MSR) Sample Receiving Facility (SRF) definition studies , 2020 .

[8]  Carlos E. Soares,et al.  Mars 2020: mission, science objectives and build , 2020, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[9]  M. S. Bell,et al.  Mars Extant Life: What's Next? Conference Report , 2020, Astrobiology.

[10]  Alvin L. Smith,et al.  Expectations for Backward Planetary Protection Planning During Mars Sample Return Planning , 2020, 2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[11]  D. Beaty,et al.  MSR Science Planning Group (MSPG) Workshop Reports: "The Relationship of Mars Sample Return Science and Containment" & "Science-Driven Contamination Control Issues Associated with the Receiving and Initial Processing of the MSR Samples" , 2019 .

[12]  M. A. Meyer,et al.  MSR Science Planning Group (MSPG) Workshop #1 Report: The Relationship of MSR Science and Containment , 2019 .

[13]  P. Rettberg,et al.  The potential science and engineering value of samples delivered to Earth by Mars sample return , 2019, Meteoritics & Planetary Science.

[14]  Raffaele Mugnuolo,et al.  iMARS Phase 2 , 2018, Astrobiology.

[15]  Kenneth L. Tanaka,et al.  A new analysis of Mars "Special Regions": findings of the second MEPAG Special Regions Science Analysis Group (SR-SAG2). , 2014, Astrobiology.

[16]  Y. Liu MARS RETURNED SAMPLE SCIENCE: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO THE INORGANIC CONTAMINATION OF GEOLOGICAL SAMPLES , 2014 .

[17]  C. Allen,et al.  Mars Returned Sample Science: Scientific Planning Related to Sample Quality , 2014 .

[18]  David W. Beaty,et al.  Planning for Mars returned sample science: final report of the MSR End-to-End International Science Analysis Group (E2E-iSAG). , 2012, Astrobiology.

[19]  Sylvia L. Miller,et al.  Planning considerations for a Mars Sample Receiving Facility: summary and interpretation of three design studies. , 2009, Astrobiology.

[20]  John D. Rummel,et al.  A Draft Test Protocol for Detecting Possible Biohazards in Martian Samples Returned to Earth , 2002 .

[21]  Margaret S. Race,et al.  Mars Sample Handling and Requirements Panel (MSHARP) , 1999 .