Attempts to develop an efficient speech test in fully modulated noise.

An earlier developed speech test with sentences in noise (Hagerman. 1982) was modified in an attempt to further increase its efficiency. The noise was thus changed to be fully modulated and the speech-to-noise ratio of each word was controlled in order to make all the words equally difficult both within and between lists. The new version was tested on 10 normal-hearing subjects. The 10 lists were equally difficult, but compared to the old material the reliability was worse, the learning effect was greater, and the slope of the intelligibility function was less than half despite efforts to maintain the quality of the test. Identical masking signals for identical words in the various lists seem to increase the learning effect. The strongly modulated noise seems to give shallow intelligibility functions for separate words and thus also for complete lists.

[1]  B Hagerman,et al.  Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology.

[2]  B C Moore,et al.  Simulation of the effects of loudness recruitment on the intelligibility of speech in noise. , 1995, British journal of audiology.

[3]  H. Gustafsson,et al.  Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  D D Dirks,et al.  Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  B Hagerman,et al.  Efficient adaptive methods for measuring speech reception threshold in quiet and in noise. , 1995, Scandinavian audiology.

[6]  B Hagerman,et al.  Efficiency of speech audiometry and other tests. , 1993, British journal of audiology.

[7]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[8]  B Hagerman,et al.  Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise. , 1984, Scandinavian audiology.

[9]  D. M. Green,et al.  A maximum-likelihood method for estimating thresholds in a yes-no task. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.