Energy and Large-Scale Patterns of Animal- and Plant-Species Richness

Many hypotheses have been proposed to explain the great variation among regions in species richness. These were tested by first examining patterns of species richness of birds, mammals, amphibians, and reptiles in 336 quadrats covering North America. These patterns were then compared with the regional variation of 21 descriptors of the environment suggested by the hypotheses. I found that, in the four vertebrate classes studied, 80%-93% of the variability in species richness could be statistically explained by a monotonically increasing function of a single variable: annual potential evapotranspiration (PET). In contrast, tree richness is more closely related to actual evapotranspiration (AET). Both AET and PET appear to be measures of available environmental energy. The relationships between tree and vertebrate richness are strikingly poor. Species richness in particular orders and families of the Vertebrata is also closely related to PET, but not always monotonically, often resembling a replacement series along an environmental gradient. The present results are consistent with the hypothesis that environmentally available energy limits regional species richness. However, my observations are not completely consistent with earlier species-energy theory. The energy-richness relationship appears to depend on scale, and it is affected differently by variations in area and in areal energy flux.

[1]  Don E. Wilson,et al.  The Mammals of North America , 2002, Nature.

[2]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  CIRCULAR CAUSAL SYSTEMS IN ECOLOGY , 1948, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[3]  The Mammals of North America , 1959 .

[4]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why Are There So Many Kinds of Animals? , 1959, The American Naturalist.

[5]  L. Slobodkin,et al.  Community Structure, Population Control, and Competition , 1960, The American Naturalist.

[6]  J. Connell,et al.  The Ecological Regulation of Species Diversity , 1964, The American Naturalist.

[7]  R. Macarthur.  PATTERNS OF SPECIES DIVERSITY , 1965 .

[8]  E. Pianka.  Latitudinal Gradients in Species Diversity: A Review of Concepts , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[9]  Robert C. Stebbins,et al.  A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians : field marks of all species in western North America , 1998 .

[10]  M. Rosenzweig.  Net Primary Productivity of Terrestrial Communities: Prediction from Climatological Data , 1968, The American Naturalist.

[11]  R. E. Cook,et al.  Variation in Species Density of North American Birds , 1969 .

[12]  V. K. Prest,et al.  Retreat of Wisconsin and recent ice in North America : speculative ice-marginal positions during recession of last ice-sheet complex , 1969 .

[13]  A. Ross Kiester,et al.  Species Density of North American Amphibians and Reptiles , 1971 .

[14]  E. L. Little.  Atlas of United States trees. , 1971 .

[15]  S. J. Arnold.  Species Densities of Predators and Their Prey , 1972, The American Naturalist.

[16]  A. Wallace.  Tropical Nature and Other Essays , 1972 .

[17]  J. C. Randloph.  Ecological Energetics of a Homeothermic Predator, The Short‐Tailed Shrew , 1973 .

[18]  H. Lieth.  Modeling the Primary Productivity of the World , 1975 .

[19]  M. Budyko,et al.  Climate and life , 1975 .

[20]  J. T. Collins,et al.  A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians: Eastern and Central North America , 1975 .

[21]  J. P. Grime,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF SHOOT PHENOLOGY AND DOMINANCE IN HERBACEOUS VEGETATION , 1977 .

[22]  Eric R. Pianka,et al.  Geographical Trends in Numbers of Species , 1978, Science.

[23]  J. Connell.  Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. , 1978, Science.

[24]  R. Hosie,et al.  Native Trees of Canada , 1979 .

[25]  W. Cleveland.  Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[26]  Earl D. McCoy,et al.  The Statistics and Biology of the Species-Area Relationship , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[27]  K. N. Rabenold.  A Reversed Latitudinal Diversity Gradient in Avian Communities of Eastern Deciduous Forests , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[28]  Peter J. Richerson,et al.  Patterns of Plant Species Diversity in California: Relation to Weather and Topography , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[29]  T. S. Elias.  The complete trees of North America : field guide and natural history , 1981 .

[30]  D. Janzen.  THE PEAK IN NORTH AMERICAN ICHNEUMONID SPECIES RICHNESS LIES BETWEEN 380 AND 420N , 1981 .

[31]  James H. Brown.  Two Decades of Homage to Santa Rosalia: Toward a General Theory of Diversity , 1981 .

[32]  D. Janzen.  The Peak in North American Ichneumonid Species Richness Lies Between 38 Degrees and 42 Degrees N , 1981 .

[33]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[34]  N. Nie.  SPSS-X User's Guide , 1983 .

[35]  David H. Wright,et al.  Species-energy theory: an extension of species-area theory , 1983 .

[36]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Tilman's predicted productivity–diversity relationship shown by desert rodents , 1984, Nature.

[37]  H. Cornell.  Local and Regional Richness of Cynipine Gall Wasps on California Oaks , 1985 .

[38]  Robert M. May,et al.  The Search for Patterns in the Balance of Nature: Advances and Retreats , 1986 .

[39]  David J. Currie,et al.  Large-scale biogeographical patterns of species richness of trees , 1987, Nature.

[40]  S. Pickett,et al.  Ecology: Individuals, populations and communities , 1987 .

[41]  J. Turner,et al.  Does Solar Energy Control Organic Diversity? Butterflies, Moths and the British Climate , 1987 .

[42]  M. J. Philbrick,et al.  Relationship between the regional abundance of forest and the composition of forest bird communities , 1987 .

[43]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  FERTILITY AND DISTURBANCE GRADIENTS: A SUMMARY MODEL FOR RIVERINE MARSH VEGETATION' , 1988 .

[44]  J. G. Owen.  ON PRODUCTIVITY AS A PREDICTOR OF RODENT AND CARNIVORE DIVERSITY , 1988 .

[45]  J. Bonner.  The Evolution of Complexity by Means of Natural Selection , 1988 .