Techno-economic and environmental analysis of coal-based synthetic natural gas process in China

Abstract Coal-based synthetic natural gas (SNG) has the potential to make a significant contribution to China's natural gas market. The present study addresses a techno-economic and environmental assessment of large-scale coal to SNG process. To decipher the difference performances of the coal-based SNG projects, three major coal-based SNG production regions in China are considered. To obtain the mass and energy balances, detailed process models are developed and overall flowsheet is simulated. On this basis, economic performance and environmental impacts are systematically analyzed based on the criteria including capital investment, production cost, breakeven price, carbon footprint, and water footprint. The economic analysis indicates that the average breakeven SNG price is 2.2 CNY/Nm 3 , and corresponding breakeven crude oil price is 62 USD/bbl. Under the current oil price, developing SNG projects potentially lead to severe economic risk. The cradle-to-gate boundary of environmental impacts analysis shows that coal to SNG processes suffer from high carbon footprint and water footprint: the GHG emissions is 4.80–5.02 kg CO 2 -eq per Nm 3 SNG, and the water consumption is 12.2–16.0 kg per Nm 3 SNG. The GHG emissions can be mitigated by CO 2 capture and storage(CCS), but it would lead to production cost increasing by 0.53 CNY/Nm 3 . In conclusion, although coal-based SNG projects can relieve the tense situation of supply and demand of natural gas, the capacity should be tightly controlled from the aspect of both economic competitiveness and environmental impacts.

[1]  Haifeng Zhuang,et al.  Application of industrial ecology in water utilization of coal chemical industry: A case study in Erdos, China , 2016 .

[2]  Y. Man,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of the coal-to-olefins process in comparison with the oil-to-olefins process , 2014 .

[3]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Coal chemical industry and its sustainable development in China , 2010 .

[4]  Mariano Martín,et al.  Alternative energy sources and technologies , 2016 .

[5]  Guo-sheng Wu,et al.  A feasibility study for CO2 recycle assistance with coke oven gas to synthetic natural gas , 2017 .

[6]  Yu Qian,et al.  Water consumption analysis of olefins production from alternative resources in China , 2016 .

[7]  Jie Feng,et al.  Carbon cycle in advanced coal chemical engineering. , 2015, Chemical Society reviews.

[8]  Yang Liu,et al.  Conceptual Design of the Coal to Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG) Process Based on BGL Gasifier: Modeling and Techno-Economic Analysis , 2017 .

[9]  Andrzej Kraslawski,et al.  Analysis of rationality of coal-based synthetic natural gas (SNG) production in China , 2014 .

[10]  T. Schildhauer,et al.  Production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) from coal and dry biomass - A technology review from 1950 to 2009 , 2010 .

[11]  I-Lung Chien,et al.  Design and Economic Evaluation of a Coal-to-Synthetic Natural Gas Process , 2015 .

[12]  Yu Qian,et al.  Coal-based synthetic natural gas (SNG) for municipal heating in China: analysis of haze pollutants and greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions , 2016 .

[13]  Fengqi You,et al.  Deciphering the true life cycle environmental impacts and costs of the mega-scale shale gas-to-olefins projects in the United States , 2016 .

[14]  Fengqi You,et al.  Assumptions and the levelized cost of energy for photovoltaics , 2011 .

[15]  Yu Qian,et al.  Integrated process for synthetic natural gas production from coal and coke-oven gas with high energy efficiency and low emission , 2016 .

[16]  Yanjun Ding,et al.  Coal-based synthetic natural gas (SNG): A solution to China’s energy security and CO2 reduction? , 2013 .

[17]  Robert B. Jackson,et al.  China's synthetic natural gas revolution , 2013 .

[18]  Nicola Verdone,et al.  Integration of SNG plants with Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies modeling , 2015 .

[19]  Xiaosong Zhang,et al.  Techno-economic performance and cost reduction potential for the substitute/synthetic natural gas and power cogeneration plant with CO2 capture , 2014 .

[20]  Sheng Li,et al.  Cogeneration of substitute natural gas and power from coal by moderate recycle of the chemical unconverted gas , 2013 .

[21]  W. M. Griffin,et al.  Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of Marcellus shale gas , 2011 .