Discriminability effect on Garner interference: evidence from recognition of facial identity and expression

Using Garner’s speeded classification task existing studies demonstrated an asymmetric interference in the recognition of facial identity and facial expression. It seems that expression is hard to interfere with identity recognition. However, discriminability of identity and expression, a potential confounding variable, had not been carefully examined in existing studies. In current work, we manipulated discriminability of identity and expression by matching facial shape (long or round) in identity and matching mouth (opened or closed) in facial expression. Garner interference was found either from identity to expression (Experiment 1) or from expression to identity (Experiment 2). Interference was also found in both directions (Experiment 3) or in neither direction (Experiment 4). The results support that Garner interference tends to occur under condition of low discriminability of relevant dimension regardless of facial property. Our findings indicate that Garner interference is not necessarily related to interdependent processing in recognition of facial identity and expression. The findings also suggest that discriminability as a mediating factor should be carefully controlled in future research.

[1]  M. Hasselmo,et al.  The role of expression and identity in the face-selective responses of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[2]  D. Algom,et al.  The perception of number from the separability of the stimulus: The Stroop effect revisited , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[3]  A. Young,et al.  Face perception after brain injury. Selective impairments affecting identity and expression. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  A. Damasio,et al.  Intact recognition of facial expression, gender, and age in patients with impaired recognition of face identity , 1988, Neurology.

[6]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Expression Influences the Recognition of Familiar Faces , 2004, Perception.

[7]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Expression is computed separately from facial identity, and it is computed separately for moving and static faces: Neuropsychological evidence , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  K. LaBar,et al.  Garner interference reveals dependencies between emotional expression and gaze in face perception. , 2007, Emotion.

[9]  J. Kaufmann Interactions between the processing of facial identity, emotional expression and facial speech? , 2002 .

[10]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  Tzvi Ganel,et al.  Effects of familiarity on the perceptual integrality of the identity and expression of faces: the parallel-route hypothesis revisited. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  W. R. Garner The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[13]  Kenji Kawano,et al.  Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[14]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  How Does the Brain Discriminate Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces?: A PET Study of Face Categorical Perception , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[16]  A. Young,et al.  Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on identity and expression , 1986, Psychological research.

[17]  R. Melara,et al.  Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: Effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Andrew W Young,et al.  Asymmetric interference between sex and emotion in face perception , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  A M Burton,et al.  Asymmetric dependencies in perceiving identity and emotion: Experiments with morphed faces , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Kenneth F. Valyear,et al.  The involvement of the “fusiform face area” in processing facial expression , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  D. Algom,et al.  A confluence of contexts: asymmetric versus global failures of selective attention to stroop dimensions. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Y. Goshen-Gottstein,et al.  Repetition priming for familiar and unfamiliar faces in a sex-judgment task: evidence for a common route for the processing of sex and identity. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Asymmetric relationships among perceptions of facial identity, emotion, and facial speech. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  J. R. Pomerantz Global and local precedence: selective attention in form and motion perception. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  L E Marks,et al.  Perceptual primacy of dimensions: support for a model of dimensional interaction. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  G. Tiberghien,et al.  Recognizing expression from familiar and unfamiliar faces , 2000 .