Prediction of intrauterine pressure waveform from transabdominal electrohysterography

Objective. We investigated the ability to non-invasively obtain uterine electromyograms (EMG; electrohysterogram (EHG)) to predict the intrauterine pressure (IUP) waveform. Study design. Patients enrolled in a term labor study of trans-abdominal electrical activity, who underwent IUP monitoring for obstetric indication, were included in this study (n = 14). EHG signals were processed and prediction filters trained against the IUP from the same patient. Sixty-eight 10-minute traces each of EHG and IUP waveforms were reviewed (Montevideo unit (MVU) calculation) by two experienced labor nurses and one obstetrician, blinded to patient and EHG vs. IUP output. In addition, area under the contraction curve (AUC), contraction detection and duration were compared. Results. EHG-derived MVUs statistically correlated with IUP (r = 0.795; p < 0.0001), but mathematically differed by 17±20% with 83% of EHG MVUs underestimating the IUP. The coefficients of variation between the two methods were relatively high (∼20%), and these could not be substantially corrected via calibration. AUC differed by 8±19% with 69% of EHG-derived AUC underestimating the IUP. EHG detected 98% of 362 IUP contractions, with 8% over-detection. Contraction duration was similar: 56.4±11.9 s vs. 55.7±13.0 s, for IUP and EHG, respectively. Conclusion. EHG-based contraction monitoring approximates IUP monitoring for contraction detection and duration. The correlation with contraction height (MVU) and AUC is much weaker with the investigated signal-processing algorithm.

[1]  G. Wolfs,et al.  An Electromyographic Study of the Human Uterus During Labor , 1971, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  E. Hon,et al.  Quantitation of uterine activity in 100 primiparous patients. , 1976, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  J. R. Huey,et al.  The evaluation of uterine activity: a comparative analysis. , 1979, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[4]  M. Wikland,et al.  Relationship between electrical and mechanical activity of the isolated term-pregnant human myometrium. , 1985, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[5]  S. Haykin,et al.  Adaptive Filter Theory , 1986 .

[6]  Head-to-Cervix Forces and Their Relationship to the Outcome of Labor , 1990, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  C Marque,et al.  Uterine electromyography: a critical review. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  P. Steer,et al.  Head‐to‐cervix force: an important physiological variable in labour. 2. Peak active force, peak active pressure and mode of delivery , 1996, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[9]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics , 1997 .

[10]  R. Garfield,et al.  Electrical Activity of the Human Uterus During Pregnancy as Recorded from the Abdominal Surface , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  D. Rouse,et al.  Active-phase labor arrest: oxytocin augmentation for at least 4 hours. , 1999, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  Jacques Duchêne,et al.  Uterine EMG analysis: a dynamic approach for change detection and classification , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  D. Rouse,et al.  Active Phase Labor Arrest: Revisiting the 2‐Hour Minimum , 2001, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  I. Verdenik,et al.  Uterine electrical activity as predictor of preterm birth in women with preterm contractions. , 2001, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[15]  Acog ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 49, December 2003: Dystocia and augmentation of labor. , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  G. Saade,et al.  Predicting Term and Preterm Delivery With Transabdominal Uterine Electromyography , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  Deniz Erdogmus,et al.  Independent components analysis for fetal electrocardiogram extraction: a case for the data efficient Mermaid algorithm , 2003, 2003 IEEE XIII Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8718).

[18]  G. Saade,et al.  Non-invasive transabdominal uterine electromyography correlates with the strength of intrauterine pressure and is predictive of labor and delivery , 2004, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[19]  Gynecologists ACOG Practice Bulletin: No. 49, December 2003. Dystocia and Augmentation of Labor , 2004 .

[20]  O. P. Tandon,et al.  Role of uterine artery velocimetry using color‐flow Doppler and electromyography of uterus in prediction of preterm labor , 2004, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[21]  Gynecologists Dystocia and the augmentation of labor , 1996, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[22]  John G. Harris,et al.  Prediction of Intrauterine Pressure From Electrohysterography Using Optimal Linear Filtering , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  C. Marque,et al.  Uterine EMG spectral analysis and relationship to mechanical activity in pregnant monkeys , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.