Texture of parenchymatous plant tissue: a comparison between tensile and other instrumental and sensory measurements of tissue strength and juiciness

Abstract The cellular basis of textural diversity in selected fruit and root tissue has been investigated using tensile measurements of tissue strength. The mechanism of tissue failure, either cell rupture or cell-to-cell debonding, was determined by examining the fracture surface using Low Temperature Scanning Electron Microscopy (LTSEM). Information provided by tensile measurements was compared with that provided by sensory and other instrumental measurements of tissue hardness and juiciness. Instrumental measurements included penetrometer, Kramer shear cell, apparent juice content, and juice release from a freshly cut surface. During tensile testing, the shape of the force-distance curve, along with maximum force and information on the cause of tissue failure were able to provide a comprehensive characterization of the texture. However, measurements of tensile strength, along with measurements of puncture strength and shear strength, showed a curvilinear relationship with sensory assessments of tissue hardness. This curvilinear relationship is fundamental to the psychophysical basis of human perception of texture. We speculate that the psychophysical laws that govern the relationship between mechanical hardness of a tissue and the associated sensory response may provide a major limitation to further improvements in the instrumental measurement of texture. We also discuss the use of instrumental measurements of juiciness to evaluate fruit quality.

[1]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[2]  R. Lill,et al.  A method for measuring the juice content of mealy nectarines , 1988 .

[3]  Ian C. Hallett,et al.  Physiological Changes Associated with Development of Mealiness of Apple Fruit during Cool Storage , 1992 .

[4]  A. Szczesniak,et al.  THE MEANING OF TEXTURAL CHARCTERISTICS -JUICINESS IN PLANT FOODSTUFFS , 1988 .

[5]  I. C. Hallett,et al.  Physiological and Mechanical Properties of Kiwifruit Tissue Associated with Texture Change during Cool Storage , 1994 .

[6]  Ian C. Hallett,et al.  Food - mouth interactions : Towards a better understanding of fruit texture , 1998 .

[7]  M. Bourne.  Texture evaluation of horticultural crops. , 1980 .

[8]  Peter W Voisey,et al.  MODERNIZATION OF TEXTURE INSTRUMENTATION. , 1971, Journal of texture studies.

[9]  J. H. Maindonald,et al.  Penetrometer Measurement of Apple and Kiwifruit Firmness: Operator and Instrument Differences , 1996 .

[10]  Ph. D. Ronald Dubner D. D. S.,et al.  The Neural Basis of Oral and Facial Function , 1978, Springer US.

[11]  Nuri N. Mohsenin,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION AND FAILURE IN SOLID FOODS WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO FRUITS AND VEGETABLES1 , 1977 .

[12]  Malcolm C. Bourne,et al.  STUDIES ON PUNCH TESTING OF APPLES , 1965 .

[13]  C. Watkins,et al.  Firmness and concentrations of acetaldehyde, ethyl acetate and ethanol in strawberries stored in controlled and modified atmospheres , 1995 .

[14]  Micha Peleg.  THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MECHANICAL HARDNESS AND ITS SENSORY ASSESSMENT , 1980 .

[15]  Fiorella Sinesio,et al.  Mechanical Properties and Sensory Evaluation of Selected Apple Cultivars , 1993 .

[16]  A. Szczesniak,et al.  BEHAVIOR OF DIFFERENT FOODS IN THE STANDARD SHEAR COMPRESSION CELL OF THE SHEAR PRESS AND THE EFFECT OF SAMPLE WEIGHT ON PEAK AREA AND MAXIMUM FORCE. , 1970, Journal of texture studies.

[17]  Margaret A. Brandt,et al.  Development of standard rating scales for mechanical parameters of texture and correlation between the objective and the sensory methods of texture evaluation , 1963 .

[18]  F. Harker,et al.  Physiological changes associated with fruit ripening and the development of mealy texture during storage of nectarines , 1993 .

[19]  G. Blanpied,et al.  A Standardized Method for Collecting Apple Pressure Test Data , 1978 .

[20]  Morten Meilgaard,et al.  Sensory Evaluation Techniques , 2020 .