Deterioration of archaeological bone - a statistical approach

The degradation of archaeological bone material in Sweden was studied (i) by examinating bone specimens, the surrounding soil and the local environment at excavations in progress, and (ii) by studying the reports of earlier excavations. Conventional and multivariate statistical methods applied to the data sets show that the degradation increases with time in the soil, and that the recent soil acidification is disastrous for the inorganic fraction of bone material. It is also observed that calcareous soil, the presence of organic matter in the soil, a deep grave, or a coffin of wood usually has a preserving effect. The empirical fact that bones of children deteriorate more than those of adults is confirmed, but no clear relation can be established between bone deterioration and soil type. The deterioration of the organic content and the histological microstructure is to a large degree dependent on microbial attack and unknown factors such as diseases, living conditions, or burial traditions.

[1]  A. Nord,et al.  The degradation of archaeological bronzes underground: evidence from museum collections , 2004, Antiquity.

[2]  M. Collins,et al.  Bone as an indicator in the in situ degradation of archaeological heritage , 2004 .

[3]  M. Collins,et al.  Characterisation of microbial attack on archaeological bone. , 2004 .

[4]  M. Collins,et al.  Sub-micron Spongiform Porosity is the Major Ultra-structural Alteration Occurring in Archaeological Bone , 2002 .

[5]  M.M.E. Jans,et al.  In situ preservation of archaeological bone: a histological study within a multidisciplinary approach , 2002 .

[6]  Robert E. M. Hedges,et al.  Bone diagenesis: an overview of processes , 2002 .

[7]  H. Kars,et al.  The degradation of bone as an indicator in the deterioration of the European archaeological property , 2002 .

[8]  A. Nord,et al.  On the deterioration of archaeological iron artefacts in soil , 2002 .

[9]  A. M. Pollard,et al.  Handbook of archaeological sciences , 2001 .

[10]  H. Kars Preserving our in situ archaeological heritage: a challenge to the geochemical engineer , 1998 .

[11]  H. Kars,et al.  'Soil Archive' Classification of European Excavation Sites in Terms of Impacts of Conservability of Archaeological Heritage , 1997 .

[12]  R. Nicholson Bone degradation, burial medium and species representation : Debunking the myths, an experiment-based approach , 1996 .

[13]  A. Pike,et al.  Measurements and relationships of diagenetic alteration of bone from three archaeological sites , 1995 .

[14]  R. Hedges,et al.  Bones and Groundwater: Towards the Modelling of Diagenetic Processes , 1995 .

[15]  A. M. Child Microbial taphonomy of archaeological bone , 1995 .

[16]  Hettelingh Jp,et al.  Calculation and mapping of critical loads in Europe: Status Report 1993. CCE report , 1993 .

[17]  Claire C. Gordon,et al.  Soil pH, Bone Preservation, and Sampling Bias at Mortuary Sites , 1981, American Antiquity.