Deformation of Reinforced Soil Wall-Embankment System on Soft Clay Foundation

This paper focuses on the patterns of deformation of the wall and the soft clay foundation beneath the reinforced soil mass based from the results of full-scale field tests and finite element analyses. The performances of two reinforced soil test wall-embankment systems constructed on soft clay foundation with different reinforcement types but have the same backfill soils were used in the investigation. One test facility used steel grid reinforcements (higher stiffness or rigidity) and the other used polymer grid reinforcements (lower stiffness). Measurements from the instrumentations of these test facilities were compared with the results from numerical simulations based on a finite element solution in which reasonable agreement were obtained. Parametric studies were then carried out to examine the effects of the stiffness of the reinforced soil system and the foundation on the overall deformation characteristics of reinforced soil wall. Results indicated that increasing the stiffness or rigidity of the reinforced soil system led to lower lateral spreading of the soft clay foundation owing to more lateral confinement of the underlying soil as compared with less stiff reinforced soil system. However, increasing the system stiffness had the tendency to settle more below the toe because a more stiff reinforced soil system tended to rotate more about the toe compared to that which has lesser system stiffness. Consequently, the pattern of foundation movements associated with system stiffness affected also the outward facing movement of the reinforced soil wall. It was found that the increase in reinforced soil system stiffness does not necessarily result to the reduction of the outward lateral wall deformation.

[1]  D. T. Bergado,et al.  Behavior of a welded wire wall with poor quality, cohesive–friction backfills on soft Bangkok clay: a case study , 1991 .

[2]  Donald W. Taylor,et al.  Fundamentals of soil mechanics , 1948 .

[3]  Dennes T. Bergado,et al.  Inverse analysis of geotechnical parameters on improved soft Bangkok clay , 1992 .

[4]  Jinchun Chai,et al.  FE ANALYSIS OF GRID REINFORCED EMBANKMENT SYSTEM ON SOFT BANGKOK CLAY , 1995 .

[5]  C. J. F. P. Jones,et al.  Reinforced earth structures situated on soft foundations , 1980 .

[6]  Dennes T. Bergado,et al.  Soil-Geogrid Reinforcement Interaction by Pullout and Direct Shear Tests , 1995 .

[7]  S. Leroueil,et al.  The permeability of natural soft clays. Part II: Permeability characteristics: Reply , 1983 .

[8]  A. McGown,et al.  Strain Behaviour of Polymeric Geogrids Subjected to Sustained and Repeated Loading in Air and in Soil , 1995 .

[9]  Jinchun Chai,et al.  Improvement Techniques of Soft Ground in Subsiding and Lowland Environment , 1994 .

[10]  James K. Mitchell,et al.  North American Practice in Reinforced Soil Systems , 1990 .

[11]  A. M. Britto,et al.  Critical State Soil Mechanics via Finite Elements , 1987 .

[12]  K. Roscoe,et al.  ON THE GENERALIZED STRESS-STRAIN BEHAVIOUR OF WET CLAY , 1968 .

[13]  K. L. Soderman,et al.  Geotextile reinforcement of embankments on peat , 1985 .

[14]  C. M. Kwok,et al.  Finite element studies of interface behaviour in reinforced embankments of soft ground , 1989 .

[15]  A. S. Balasubramaniam,et al.  Critical state parameters and peak stress envelopes for Bangkok Clays , 1978, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.