The effect of strict muscle stress limits on abdominal muscle force predictions for combined torsion and extension loadings.

The objective of this study was to determine to what extent the central nervous system activates torso muscles so as to equalize the largest muscle stresses. Two optimization models that treat large muscle stresses differently were formulated. One model minimized spinal compression force subject to the lowest possible muscle stress limit, and the other model minimized the sum of cubed muscle stresses. Experimental conditions were determined for which the two models made different muscle force predictions. Specifically, the models predicted different rectus abdominis activity levels for tasks involving torsion and extension moment loadings. Surface electromyography was used to evaluate the model predictions. Applied loads were chosen to assure that the rectus abdominis EMG exceeded 30% MVC. Analysis of variance indicated that rectus abdominis activity was not affected by torsion loading at the p < 0.05 level of significance in a statistical design having 90% power, which was consistent with the predictions of the model that minimized the sum of cubed muscle stresses. Thus, it was concluded that equalization of the largest muscles stress was not the paramount objective of the central nervous system in the tasks studied.

[1]  M. A. Townsend,et al.  Muscular synergism--I. On criteria for load sharing between synergistic muscles. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  A. Bergmark Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in mechanical engineering. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[3]  A B Schultz,et al.  Biomechanical model calculation of muscle contraction forces: a double linear programming method. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  N Bogduk,et al.  The biomechanics of the lumbar multifidus. , 1986, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  A. Schultz,et al.  The Activity of Individual Trunk Muscles During Heavy Physical Loading , 1987, Spine.

[6]  G. Andersson,et al.  The Role of Prerotation of the Trunk in Axial Twisting Efforts , 1987, Spine.

[7]  A. Schultz,et al.  Analysis of Loads on the Lumbar Spine , 1981, Spine.

[8]  A Schultz,et al.  Use of lumbar trunk muscles in isometric performance of mechanically complex standing tasks , 1983, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  A. Schultz,et al.  Lumbar trunk muscle use in standing isometric heavy exertions , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  M Gagnon,et al.  A Three‐Dimensional Digitization Method to Measure Trunk Muscle Lines of Action , 1988, Spine.

[11]  G. Andersson,et al.  Electromyographic studies of the lumbar trunk musculature during the development of axial torques , 1986, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  S Gracovetsky,et al.  The Optimum Spine , 1986, Spine.

[13]  R W Norman,et al.  Measurement of the trunk musculature of active males using CT scan radiography: implications for force and moment generating capacity about the L4/L5 joint. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  M. Tracy,et al.  The Geometry of the Muscles of the Lumbar Spine Determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1989, Spine.

[15]  S. McGill Electromyographic activity of the abdominal and low back musculature during the generation of isometric and dynamic axial trunk torque: Implications for lumbar mechanics , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[16]  Jack M. Winters,et al.  Role of Muscle in Postural Tasks: Spinal Loading and Postural Stability , 1990 .

[17]  D R Pedersen,et al.  Direct comparison of muscle force predictions using linear and nonlinear programming. , 1987, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Z. Ladin,et al.  1989 Volvo Award in Biomechanics: Mechanical Recruitment of Low-Back Muscles: Theoretical Predictions and Experimental Validation , 1989, Spine.

[20]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Lumbar muscle size and locations from CT scans of 96 women of age 40 to 63 years. , 1990, Clinical biomechanics.