Noise in Brain Activity Engenders Perception and Influences Discrimination Sensitivity

Behavioral and brain responses to identical stimuli can vary with experimental and task parameters, including the context of stimulus presentation or attention. More surprisingly, computational models suggest that noise-related random fluctuations in brain responses to stimuli would alone be sufficient to engender perceptual differences between physically identical stimuli. In two experiments combining psychophysics and EEG in healthy humans, we investigated brain mechanisms whereby identical stimuli are (erroneously) perceived as different (higher vs lower in pitch or longer vs shorter in duration) in the absence of any change in the experimental context. Even though, as expected, participants' percepts to identical stimuli varied randomly, a classification algorithm based on a mixture of Gaussians model (GMM) showed that there was sufficient information in single-trial EEG to reliably predict participants' judgments of the stimulus dimension. By contrasting electrical neuroimaging analyses of auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) to the identical stimuli as a function of participants' percepts, we identified the precise timing and neural correlates (strength vs topographic modulations) as well as intracranial sources of these erroneous perceptions. In both experiments, AEP differences first occurred ∼100 ms after stimulus onset and were the result of topographic modulations following from changes in the configuration of active brain networks. Source estimations localized the origin of variations in perceived pitch of identical stimuli within right temporal and left frontal areas and of variations in perceived duration within right temporoparietal areas. We discuss our results in terms of providing neurophysiologic evidence for the contribution of random fluctuations in brain activity to conscious perception.

[1]  M. Murray,et al.  A Tutorial Review of Electrical Neuroimaging From Group-Average to Single-Trial Event-Related Potentials , 2012, Developmental neuropsychology.

[2]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Decoding stimulus-related information from single-trial EEG responses based on voltage topographies , 2012, Pattern Recognit..

[3]  Michael A. Pitts,et al.  Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation during binocular rivalry , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[4]  Jean Vroomen,et al.  Brain activation during audiovisual exposure anticipates future perception of ambiguous speech , 2011, NeuroImage.

[5]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Spatiotemporal Analysis of Multichannel EEG: CARTOOL , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[6]  Peter Neri,et al.  How inherently noisy is human sensory processing? , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  Direct Recordings of Pitch Responses from Human Auditory Cortex , 2010, Current Biology.

[8]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Comparing ICA-based and Single-Trial Topographic ERP Analyses , 2010, Brain Topography.

[9]  Thomas Koenig,et al.  A Method to Determine the Presence of Averaged Event-Related Fields Using Randomization Tests , 2010, Brain Topography.

[10]  Martin Wiener,et al.  The image of time: A voxel-wise meta-analysis , 2010, NeuroImage.

[11]  Teemu Rinne,et al.  Task-Dependent Activations of Human Auditory Cortex during Pitch Discrimination and Pitch Memory Tasks , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Distributed and Antagonistic Contributions of Ongoing Activity Fluctuations to Auditory Stimulus Detection , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Principles of Topographic Analyses for Electrical Neuroimaging , 2009 .

[14]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Electromagnetic responses to invisible face stimuli during binocular suppression , 2009, NeuroImage.

[15]  Josh H. McDermott,et al.  Sensory noise explains auditory frequency discrimination learning induced by training with identical stimuli , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Theodor Landis,et al.  Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation of bistable stimuli. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  I. Peretz,et al.  Evidence for the role of the right auditory cortex in fine pitch resolution , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in posterior alpha-band EEG activity reflect variability in excitability of human visual areas. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  The Role of Superior Temporal Cortex in Auditory Timing , 2008, PloS one.

[20]  Denis Brunet,et al.  Topographic ERP Analyses: A Step-by-Step Tutorial Review , 2008, Brain Topography.

[21]  Robert J. Zatorre,et al.  Depth electrode recordings show double dissociation between pitch processing in lateral Heschl’s gyrus and sound onset processing in medial Heschl’s gyrus , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  S. Clarke,et al.  Single-trial topographic analysis of human EEG: A new `image' of event-related potentials , 2007, 2007 6th International Special Topic Conference on Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine.

[23]  R. Blake,et al.  Neural bases of binocular rivalry , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Sygal Amitay,et al.  Discrimination learning induced by training with identical stimuli , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  R. Patterson,et al.  From noise to pitch: Transient and sustained responses of the auditory evoked field , 2006, Hearing Research.

[26]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2005, Nature.

[27]  Laurent Hugueville,et al.  Neural network involved in time perception: An fMRI study comparing long and short interval estimation , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[28]  M. Murray,et al.  EEG source imaging , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Electrical neuroimaging based on biophysical constraints , 2004, NeuroImage.

[30]  C. Michel,et al.  Electromagnetic Inverse Solutions in Anatomically Constrained Spherical Head Models , 2004, Brain Topography.

[31]  C. Michel,et al.  Noninvasive Localization of Electromagnetic Epileptic Activity. II. Demonstration of Sublobar Accuracy in Patients with Simultaneous Surface and Depth Recordings , 2004, Brain Topography.

[32]  C. Michel,et al.  Noninvasive Localization of Electromagnetic Epileptic Activity. I. Method Descriptions and Simulations , 2004, Brain Topography.

[33]  David J. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal correlates of perception in early visual cortex , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  R. Patterson,et al.  The Processing of Temporal Pitch and Melody Information in Auditory Cortex , 2002, Neuron.

[35]  S. Knecht,et al.  Latency of Auditory Evoked Field Deflection N100m Ruled by Pitch or Spectrum? , 2001, Audiology and Neurotology.

[36]  T. Griffiths The Neural Processing of Complex Sounds , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[37]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Interval and ordinal properties of sequences are associated with distinct premotor areas. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  The evolution of brain activation during temporal processing , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  G. Woodman,et al.  Event-related potential studies of attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  D. Heeger,et al.  Activity in primary visual cortex predicts performance in a visual detection task , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Analysis of temporal structure in sound by the human brain , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  G D Lewen,et al.  Reproducibility and Variability in Neural Spike Trains , 1997, Science.

[44]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Dynamics of Ongoing Activity: Explanation of the Large Variability in Evoked Cortical Responses , 1996, Science.

[45]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Neural mechanisms underlying melodic perception and memory for pitch , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[46]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing. , 1992, Science.

[47]  D. Guthrie,et al.  Significance testing of difference potentials. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[48]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[49]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[50]  Antoine Rémond,et al.  Methods of Analysis of Brain Electrical and Magnetic Signals , 1987 .

[51]  F. Perrin,et al.  Mapping of scalp potentials by surface spline interpolation. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[52]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Principles of spatial analysis , 1987 .

[53]  J. P. Ary,et al.  Location of Sources of Evoked Scalp Potentials: Corrections for Skull and Scalp Thicknesses , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[54]  R Parasuraman,et al.  Brain events underlying detection and recognition of weak sensory signals. , 1980, Science.

[55]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[56]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Transducer noise in a photoreceptor , 1979, Nature.

[57]  P. H. Lindsay,et al.  Evoked Potential Correlates of Auditory Signal Detection , 1971, Science.

[58]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  L. Pinneo On noise in the nervous system. , 1966, Psychological review.

[60]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .