Power-efficient real-time approach to non-wear time detection for smartwatches

There is a growing interest in the use of smartwatches to collect real-time physical activity and health care data. Much of this information is useful only when the person is wearing the smartwatch. Collecting data during other times consumes precious battery life and potentially communication bandwidth to relay the information. An approach that can correctly classify temporal regions during which the watch is not worn has the obvious advantages of both improving battery life and minimize communication bandwidth. There have been several methods proposed to determine wear time using passive devices such as accelerometers. However, they are offline procedures where data are collected continuously during data collection phase and non-wear times are excluded later and before analysis. Smartwatches' computational power allow us to perform several preprocessing steps instantly and concurrently with the data collection. We propose a power-efficient and real-time approach to non-wear time detection method which is capable of providing labels for 15-sec epochs accurately (accuracies for wear time and non-wear time are 97.68% and 96.78%, respectively). We also show that detecting non-wear periods in real-time ameliorates the battery requirements by as much as 50%.

[1]  Leena Choi,et al.  Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  Shang-Ming Zhou,et al.  Classification of accelerometer wear and non-wear events in seconds for monitoring free-living physical activity , 2015, BMJ Open.

[3]  J. Staudenmayer,et al.  Methods to estimate aspects of physical activity and sedentary behavior from high-frequency wrist accelerometer measurements. , 2015, Journal of applied physiology.

[4]  C. R. Rao,et al.  The Utilization of Multiple Measurements in Problems of Biological Classification , 1948 .

[5]  Sanjay Ranka,et al.  Actigraphy features for predicting mobility disability in older adults , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[6]  Zhi-Hua Zhou,et al.  A k-nearest neighbor based algorithm for multi-label classification , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing.

[7]  François Fraysse,et al.  Accelerometer wear-site detection: When one site does not suit all, all of the time. , 2017, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[8]  Johan A. K. Suykens,et al.  Least Squares Support Vector Machine Classifiers , 1999, Neural Processing Letters.

[9]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Assessing physical activity using wearable monitors: measures of physical activity. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  Robert Simon Sherratt,et al.  A Survey on Wireless Body Area Networks for eHealthcare Systems in Residential Environments , 2016, Sensors.

[11]  Leena Choi,et al.  Assessment of wear/nonwear time classification algorithms for triaxial accelerometer. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  Maryam Najafian,et al.  Delay reduction in real-time recognition of human activity for stroke rehabilitation , 2016, 2016 First International Workshop on Sensing, Processing and Learning for Intelligent Machines (SPLINE).

[13]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[14]  David E. Goodrich,et al.  An Online Community Improves Adherence in an Internet-Mediated Walking Program. Part 1: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[15]  Parisa Rashidi,et al.  ROAMM: A software infrastructure for real-time monitoring of personal health , 2016, 2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom).

[16]  Elin Kolle,et al.  Correlates of objectively measured physical activity in adults and older people: a cross-sectional study of population-based sample of adults and older people living in Norway , 2014, International Journal of Public Health.