Supporting active learning in an undergraduate geotechnical engineering course using group-based audience response systems quizzes

The use of audience response systems (ARSs) or ‘clickers’ in higher education has increased over the recent years, predominantly owing to their ability to actively engage students, for promoting individual and group learning, and for providing instantaneous feedback to students and teachers. This paper describes how group-based ARS quizzes have been integrated into an undergraduate civil engineering course on foundation design. Overall, the ARS summary quizzes were very well received by the students. Feedback obtained from the students indicates that the majority believed the group-based quizzes were useful activities, which helped to improve their understanding of course materials, encouraged self-assessment, and assisted preparation for their summative examination. Providing students with clickers does not, however, necessarily guarantee the class will be engaged with the activity. If an ARS activity is to be successful, careful planning and design must be carried out and modifications adopted where necessary, which should be informed by the literature and relevant student feedback.

[1]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Timing of Feedback and Verbal Learning , 1988 .

[2]  Aviad Shapira Bringing the Site into the Classroom: A Construction Engineering Laboratory , 1995 .

[3]  Lei Bao,et al.  Testing a new voting machine question methodology , 2008 .

[4]  James H. Davenport,et al.  The use of an Electronic Voting System to enhance student feedback , 2009 .

[5]  G. Boulton‐Lewis Teaching for quality learning at university , 2008 .

[6]  Aruna Shekar,et al.  Active learning and reflection in product development engineering education , 2007 .

[7]  Michele H. Jackson,et al.  The learning environment in clicker classrooms: student processes of learning and involvement in large university‐level courses using student response systems , 2007 .

[8]  Janet A Taylor,et al.  Assessment in First Year University: A Model to Manage Transition , 2008, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice.

[9]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  Experiences and observations in introducing students to design and manufacturing globalization , 2005 .

[10]  Jill A. Marshall,et al.  Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature , 2006 .

[11]  Carl Reidsema,et al.  Educational design and online support for an innovative project-based course in engineering design , 2006 .

[12]  Jesús Félez,et al.  Experiences in education innovation: developing tools in support of active learning , 2006 .

[13]  D. Hounsell The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education , 1997 .

[14]  Anna Carlin,et al.  Waking the Dead: Using interactive technology to engage passive listeners in the classroom , 2004, AMCIS.

[15]  H. Sluiter [Learning by doing]. , 1977, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[16]  John W. Sutherland,et al.  Enabling Sustainable Thinking in Undergraduate Engineering Education , 2007 .

[17]  Jane E Caldwell,et al.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[18]  Kenneth Gavin,et al.  Case study of a project-based learning course in civil engineering design , 2011 .

[19]  N. Entwistle Contrasting Perspectives on Learning , 2005 .

[20]  T. Shuell Cognitive Conceptions of Learning , 1986 .

[22]  Johannes Magenheim,et al.  Classroom Response Systems , 2013, Informatik-Spektrum.

[23]  Anthony Mills,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of construction site visits as a learning experience for undergraduate students enrolled in a built environment course , 2006 .

[24]  D. Bligh What's the Use of Lectures? , 1971 .

[25]  Abdallah M. Hasna,et al.  Problem Based Learning in Engineering Design , 2008 .

[26]  D. Nicol,et al.  Peer Instruction versus Class-wide Discussion in Large Classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom , 2003 .

[27]  Bjarne Schmidt,et al.  Teaching engineering dynamics by use of peer instruction supported by an audience response system , 2011 .

[28]  Celia Popovic,et al.  Teaching for quality learning at university. (2nd Edn.) , 2013 .

[29]  Chris Dowlen,et al.  DOING ENGINEERING DESIGN: REFLECTIONS ON THE ACTIVE LEARNING EXPERIENCE , 2011 .