Voluntary risk taking and skill deficits in young driver accidents in the UK.

In absolute terms, young drivers have three to four times as many accidents per year as older drivers; and even allowing for their relative numbers in the population, their accident involvement is about 2.5 times higher than older drivers. A sample of 3437 accident reports was considered, including 1296 in detail, from midland police forces in the UK, involving drivers aged 17-25, and covering the years 1994-1996 inclusive. Four types of accident were identified as being of particular concern due to their high frequency: 'cross-flow'-turns; rear-end shunts; loss of control on bends; and accidents in darkness. (The term 'cross-flow' is used in relation to turns to denote an intersection accident where a driver is turning across the path of oncoming traffic, i.e., left turns in the US and continental Europe, but right turns in the UK and other countries where driving on the left side of the road is the norm.) An examination of driver risk taking behaviours as revealed in police interviews gave an insight into some of the motivational factors underlying young driver behaviour. Young driver accidents of all types are found to be frequently the result of 'risk taking' factors as opposed to 'skill deficit' factors. It had previously been thought that one of the main problems that young drivers have is in the area of specific skills needed in the driving task. However, it appears that a large percentage of their accidents are purely the result of two or three failures resulting from voluntary risk taking behaviour, rather than skill deficits per se. It is shown that specific groups of young drivers can even be considered as above average in driving skills, but simultaneously have a higher accident involvement due to their voluntary decisions to take risks.

[1]  D. Parker INTENTIONS TO VIOLATE , 1991 .

[2]  S A Everett,et al.  Trends and subgroup differences in transportation-related injury risk and safety behaviors among high school students, 1991-1997. , 2001, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[3]  P J Ward,et al.  Overtaking road-accidents: differences in manoeuvre as a function of driver age. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  G. Maycock THE ACCIDENT LIABILITY OF MOTORCYCLISTS AND CAR DRIVERS , 1991 .

[5]  GlLLES Malaterre,et al.  Error analysis and in-depth accident studies , 1990 .

[6]  J R Treat,et al.  TRI-LEVEL STUDY OF THE CAUSES OF TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS. VOLUME I: CASUAL FACTOR TABULATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS , 1977 .

[7]  E Forsyth,et al.  COHORT STUDY OF LEARNER AND NOVICE DRIVERS. PART 1: LEARNING TO DRIVE AND PERFORMANCE IN THE DRIVING TEST , 1992 .

[8]  R West,et al.  Direct observation of driving, self reports of driver behaviour, and accident involvement. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[9]  Stephen G. Stradling,et al.  YOUNG DRIVER ATTITUDES , 2000 .

[10]  Hamish A Deery,et al.  Hazard and Risk Perception among Young Novice Drivers , 1999 .

[11]  J Pollock,et al.  PRE-DRIVERS' BEHAVIOUR IN A DRIVING TASK: AN ANALYSIS OF INTERACTIVE VIDEO DATA , 1992 .

[12]  D. Wright Behavioural research in road safety VII , 1998 .

[13]  I. D. Brown,et al.  Exposure and experience are a confounded nuisance in research on driver behaviour. , 1982 .

[14]  E Forsyth,et al.  COHORT STUDY OF LEARNER AND NOVICE DRIVERS: PART 3, ACCIDENTS, OFFENCES AND DRIVING EXPERIENCE IN THE FIRST THREE YEARS OF DRIVING , 1995 .