Extreme UV secondary electron yield measurements of Ru, Sn, and Hf oxide thin films

Abstract. Background: The secondary electron yield (SEY) of materials is important for topics as nanoparticle photoresists and extreme ultraviolet (EUV) optics contamination. Aim: Experimentally measure SEY and secondary electron energy distributions for Ru, Sn, and Hf oxide. Approach: The SEY and energy distribution resulting from 65 to 112 eV EUV radiation are measured for thin-film oxides or films with native oxide. Results: The total SEY can be explained by EUV absorption in the topmost nanometer of (native) oxide of the investigated materials. Conclusions: Although the relative SEY of Ru and Sn is well-explained by the difference in EUV absorption properties, the SEY of HfO2 is almost a factor 2 higher than expected. Based on the energy distribution of secondary electrons, this may be related to a lower barrier for secondary electron emission.

[1]  Pate,et al.  Photoelectric emission from negative-electron-affinity diamond (111) surfaces: Exciton breakup versus conduction-band emission. , 1995, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[2]  Pasqualina M. Sarro,et al.  Effect of thermal annealing and chemical treatments on secondary electron emission properties of atomic layer deposited MgO , 2018, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A.

[3]  Frederik Bijkerk,et al.  Electronegativity-dependent tin etching from thin films , 2016 .

[4]  Markos Trikeriotis,et al.  Nanoparticle Photoresists: Ligand Exchange as a New, Sensitive EUV Patterning Mechanism , 2013 .

[5]  J. Wesson,et al.  RESEARCH NOTES: Heat flow through a Langmuir sheath in the presence of electron emission , 1967 .

[6]  Peter J. Cumpson,et al.  Elastic Scattering Corrections in AES and XPS. II. Estimating Attenuation Lengths and Conditions Required for their Valid Use in Overlayer/Substrate Experiments , 1997 .

[7]  Louis Malter,et al.  Thin Film Field Emission , 1936 .

[8]  Jason McPhate,et al.  An atomic layer deposition method to fabricate economical and robust large area microchannel plates for photodetectors , 2012 .

[9]  Markos Trikeriotis,et al.  Oxide nanoparticle EUV resists: toward understanding the mechanism of positive and negative tone patterning , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Yasin Ekinci,et al.  Absorption coefficient of metal-containing photoresists in the extreme ultraviolet , 2018 .

[11]  David M. Paganin,et al.  X-ray interactions with matter , 2006 .

[12]  Ryoichi Hirano,et al.  An analysis of the impact of native oxide, surface contamination and material density on total electron yield in the absence of surface charging effects , 2016 .

[13]  Christopher K. Ober,et al.  EUV photolithography: resist progress in metal–organic complex photoresists , 2018, Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS.

[14]  Andrew G. Glen,et al.  APPL , 2001 .

[15]  B. L. Henke,et al.  X-Ray Interactions: Photoabsorption, Scattering, Transmission, and Reflection at E = 50-30,000 eV, Z = 1-92 , 1993 .

[16]  M. Wittmer,et al.  Conducting Transition Metal Oxides: Possibilities for RuO2 in VLSI Metallization. , 1989 .

[17]  Alexander Gottwald,et al.  The U125 insertion device beamline at the Metrology Light Source. , 2019, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[18]  T. Madey,et al.  Surface phenomena related to mirror degradation in extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography , 2006 .

[19]  Boris V. Yakshinskiy,et al.  Carbon accumulation and mitigation processes, and secondary electron yields of ruthenium surfaces , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[20]  Yevgeny Raitses,et al.  Analysis of secondary electron emission for conducting materials using 4-grid LEED/AES optics , 2015 .