Optimal cognitive transmission exploiting redundancy in the primary ARQ process

Cognitive radio technology enables the coexistence of Primary (PUs) and Secondary Users (SUs) in the same spectrum. In this work, it is assumed that the PU implements a retransmission-based error control technique (ARQ). This creates an inherent redundancy in the interference created by primary transmissions to the SU. We investigate secondary transmission policies that take advantage of this redundancy. The basic idea is that, if a Secondary Receiver (SR) learns the Primary Message (PM) in a given primary retransmission, then it can use this knowledge to cancel the primary interference in the subsequent slots in case of primary retransmissions, thus achieving a larger secondary throughput. This gives rise to interesting trade-offs in the design of the secondary policy. In fact, on the one hand, a secondary transmission potentially increases the secondary throughput but, on the other, causes interference to the reception of the PM at the Primary Receiver (PR) and SR. Such interference may induce retransmissions of the same PM, which plays to the advantage of the secondary user, while at the same time making decoding of the PM more difficult also at the SR and reducing the available margin on the given interference constraint at the PR. It is proved that the optimal secondary strategy prioritizes transmissions in the states where the PM is known to the SR, due to the ability of the latter to perform interference mitigation and obtain a larger secondary throughput. Moreover, when the primary constraint is sufficiently loose, the Secondary Transmitter should also trasmit when the PM is unknown to the SR. The structure of the optimal policy is found, and the throughput benefit of the proposed technique is shown by numerical results.

[1]  Shlomo Shamai,et al.  On the Capacity of Interference Channels with a Partially-Cognitive Transmitter , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[2]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Two Volume Set , 1995 .

[3]  Keith W. Ross,et al.  Randomized and Past-Dependent Policies for Markov Decision Processes with Multiple Constraints , 1989, Oper. Res..

[4]  Jon M. Peha,et al.  Approaches to spectrum sharing , 2005, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[5]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of information theory (2. ed.) , 2006 .

[6]  Jon M. Peha,et al.  Sharing Spectrum Through Spectrum Policy Reform and Cognitive Radio , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[7]  Stefan Parkvall,et al.  Performance comparison of HARQ with Chase combining and incremental redundancy for HSDPA , 2001, IEEE 54th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC Fall 2001. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37211).

[8]  Joseph Mitola,et al.  Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal , 1999, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[9]  Aria Nosratinia,et al.  Cognitive Radio Protocols Based on Exploiting Hybrid ARQ Retransmissions , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[10]  Pramod Viswanath,et al.  Cognitive Radio: An Information-Theoretic Perspective , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[11]  Mingyan Liu,et al.  Optimality of Myopic Sensing in Multi-Channel Opportunistic Access , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[12]  Urbashi Mitra,et al.  Cognitive interference management in retransmission-based wireless networks , 2009, 2009 47th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[13]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  Breaking Spectrum Gridlock With Cognitive Radios: An Information Theoretic Perspective , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[14]  Ravi Narasimhan,et al.  Individual Outage Rate Regions for Fading Multiple Access Channels , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[15]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .