Shape Reconstruction in X-Ray Tomography from a Small Number of Projections Using Deformable Models

X-ray tomographic image reconstruction consists of determining an object function from its projections. In many applications such as nondestructive testing, we look for a fault region (air) in a homogeneous, known background (metal). The image reconstruction problem then becomes the determination of the shape of the default re­ gion. Two approaches can be used: modeling the image as a binary Markov random field and estimating the pixels of the image, or modeling the shape of the fault and estimating it directly from the projections. In this work we model the fault shape by a deformable polygonal disc or a deformable polyhedral volume and propose a new method for directly estimating the coordinates of its vertices from a very limited number of its projections. The basic idea is not new, but in other competing methods, in general, the fault shape is modeled by a small number of parameters (polygonal shapes with very small number of vertices, snakes and deformable templates) and these parameters are estimated either by least squares or by maximum likelihood methods. We propose modeling the shape of the fault region by a polygon with a large number of vertices, allowing modeling of nearly any shape and estimation of its vertices' coordinates directly from the projections by defining the solution as the minimizer of an appropriate regularized criterion. This formulation can also be interpreted as a maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimate in a Bayesian estimation framework. To optimize this criterion we use either a simulated an­ nealing or a special purpose deterministic algorithm based on iterated conditional modes (leM). The simulated results are very encouraging, especially when the number and the angles of projections are very limited.

[1]  Gabor T. Herman,et al.  Basic methods of tomography and inverse problems , 1987 .

[2]  A. Mohammad-Djafari,et al.  A SCALE INVARIANT BAYESIAN METHOD TO SOLVE LINEAR INVERSE PROBLEMS , 2001, physics/0111125.

[3]  Ali Mohammad-Djafari Image Reconstruction Of A Compact Object From A Few Number Of Projections , 1996 .

[4]  Ali Mohammad-Djafari,et al.  Reconstruction of the shape of a compact object from few projections , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing.

[5]  Julian Besag,et al.  Digital Image Processing: Towards Bayesian image analysis , 1989 .

[6]  Anna Tonazzini,et al.  A Deterministic Algorithm for Reconstructing Images with Interacting Discontinuities , 1994, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[7]  Ali Mohammad-Djafari,et al.  Eddy current tomography using a binary Markov model , 1996, Signal Process..

[8]  D. Premel,et al.  Eddy current tomography in cylindrical geometry , 1995 .

[9]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  J. Besag On the Statistical Analysis of Dirty Pictures , 1986 .

[11]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  Convex set reconstruction using prior shape information , 1991, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[12]  M. Glas,et al.  Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging , 2000 .

[13]  Ali Mohammad-Djafari,et al.  Inversion of large-support ill-conditioned linear operators using a Markov model with a line process , 1994, Proceedings of ICASSP '94. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[14]  Ali Mohammad-Djafari,et al.  Inversion of large-support ill-posed linear operators using a piecewise Gaussian MRF , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[15]  R. J. McKee,et al.  Uncertainty assessment for reconstructions based on deformable geometry , 1997 .

[16]  P. Lions,et al.  Image selective smoothing and edge detection by nonlinear diffusion. II , 1992 .

[17]  Kenneth M. Hanson,et al.  Uncertainties in tomographic reconstructions based on deformable models , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[18]  Baba C. Vemuri,et al.  Shape Modeling with Front Propagation: A Level Set Approach , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  Gif-sur-Yvette.,et al.  Scale Invariant Markov Models for Bayesian Inversion of Linear Inverse Problems , 2001, physics/0111124.

[20]  Ali Mohammad-Djafari,et al.  Data Fusion in the Field of Non Destructive Testing , 1996 .

[21]  Alan S. Willsky,et al.  Reconstruction from projections based on detection and estimation of objects , 1983, ICASSP.

[22]  Stuart Geman,et al.  Statistical methods for tomographic image reconstruction , 1987 .

[23]  Guy Demoment,et al.  Image reconstruction and restoration: overview of common estimation structures and problems , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[24]  Ken D. Sauer,et al.  A generalized Gaussian image model for edge-preserving MAP estimation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[25]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  A moment-based variational approach to tomographic reconstruction , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[26]  F. Santosa A Level-set Approach Inverse Problems Involving Obstacles , 1995 .

[27]  J. Besag,et al.  Spatial Statistics and Bayesian Computation , 1993 .

[28]  Peter Green,et al.  Spatial statistics and Bayesian computation (with discussion) , 1993 .

[29]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Reconstructing polygons from moments with connections to array processing , 1995, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[30]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Compact Object Recognition Using Energy-Function-Based Optimization , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[31]  J. Sethian,et al.  Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations , 1988 .

[32]  Ali Mohammad-Djafari,et al.  Array processing techniques and shape reconstruction in tomography , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[33]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  Reconstructing Convex Sets from Support Line Measurements , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[34]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Reconstructing Binary Polygonal Objects from Projections: A Statistical View , 1994, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..