Why Did The Incumbency Advantage In U.S. House Elections Grow

Theory: A simple rational entry argument suggests that the value of incumbency consists not just of a direct effect, reflecting the value of resources (such as staff) attached to legislative office, but also of an indirect effect, reflecting the fact that stronger challengers are less likely to contest incumbent-held seats. The indirect effect is the product of a scare-off effect-the ability of incumbents to scare off high-quality challengers-and a quality effect-reflecting how much electoral advantage a party accrues when it has an experienced rather than an inexperienced candidate. Hypothesis: The growth of the overall incumbency advantage was driven principally by increases in the quality effect. Methods: We use a simple two-equation model, estimated by ordinary least-squares regression, to analyze U.S. House election data from 1948 to 1990. Results: Most of the increase in the incumbency advantage, at least down to 1980, came through increases in the quality effect (i.e., the advantage to the incumbent party of having a low-quality challenger). This suggests that the task for those wishing to explain the growth in the vote-denominated incumbency advantage is to explain why the quality effect grew. It also suggests that resource-based explanations of the growth in the incumbency advantage cannot provide a full explanation.

[1]  Linda L. Fowler.  Challengers, Competition, and Reelection: Comparing Senate and House Elections. By Jonathan S. Krasno. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995. 195p. $26.00. , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[2]  G. Cox,et al.  The Incumbency Advantage in Multimember Districts: Evidence from the U. S. States , 1995 .

[3]  Thomas M. Holbrook,et al.  The Effects of Leadership Positions on Votes for Incumbents in State Legislative Elections , 1993 .

[4]  Gary W. Cox,et al.  The Increasing Advantage of Incumbency in the U. S. States , 1993 .

[5]  R. Alvarez,et al.  Policy Moderation or Conflicting Expectations? , 1993 .

[6]  Linda L. Fowler.  Candidates, Congress, and the American democracy , 1993 .

[7]  George Serra,et al.  The Electoral Consequences of Perquisite Use: The Casework Case , 1992 .

[8]  Stephen Ansolabehere,et al.  The Vanishing Marginals and Electoral Responsiveness , 1992, British Journal of Political Science.

[9]  R. Niemi,et al.  Candidacies and Competitiveness in Multimember Districts , 1991 .

[10]  Thomas M. Holbrook,et al.  Sophomore Surge in State Legislative Elections, 1968-86 , 1991 .

[11]  James C. Garand.  Electoral Marginality in State Legislative Elections, 1968-86 , 1991 .

[12]  Paul Brace,et al.  Vanishing Marginals in State Legislative Elections , 1991 .

[13]  Gary King,et al.  Systematic Consequences of Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. House Elections , 1991 .

[14]  G. King,et al.  Constituency Service and Incumbency Advantage , 1991, British Journal of Political Science.

[15]  A. Gelman,et al.  Estimating Incumbency Advantage Without Bias , 1990 .

[16]  David A. Breaux.  Specifying the Impact of Incumbency On State Legislative Elections , 1990 .

[17]  G. Jacobson,et al.  The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Argument , 1990 .

[18]  G. Jacobson,et al.  The Electoral Origins Of Divided Government , 1990 .

[19]  Charles Stewart.  A Sequential Model of U. S. Senate Elections , 1989 .

[20]  M. Munger,et al.  Declining electoral competitiveness in the House of Representatives: The differential impact of improved transportation technology , 1989 .

[21]  Malcolm E. Jewell,et al.  The Effect of Incumbency on State Legislative Elections , 1988 .

[22]  D. Green,et al.  Preempting Quality Challengers in House Elections , 1988, The Journal of Politics.

[23]  G. Jacobson,et al.  The Marginals Never Vanished: Incumbency and Competition in Elections to the U.S. House OfRepresentatives, 1952-1982 , 1987 .

[24]  B. Cain.  The personal vote , 1987 .

[25]  Donald A. Gross,et al.  Changes in the Vote Margins for Congressional Candidates: A Specification of Historical Trends , 1984, American Political Science Review.

[26]  John R. Wright,et al.  The Incumbency Effect in Congressional Elections: A Test of Two Explanations , 1983 .

[27]  J. R. Alford,et al.  Increased Incumbency Advantage in the House , 1981, The Journal of Politics.

[28]  M. Collie.  Incumbency, Electoral Safety, and Turnover in the House of Representatives, 1952–76 , 1981, American Political Science Review.

[29]  James L. Payne,et al.  The Personal Electoral Advantage of House Incumbents, 1936-1976 , 1980 .

[30]  G. Jacobson.  Money in congressional elections , 1980 .

[31]  W. Cleveland.  Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[32]  Richard Born,et al.  Generational Replacement and the Growth of Incumbent Reelection Margins in the U.S. House , 1979, American Political Science Review.

[33]  David W. Rohde.  Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of Members of the United States House of Representatives , 1979 .

[34]  Richard F. Fenno.  Home Style : House Members in Their Districts , 1978 .

[35]  Albert D. Cover.  One Good Term Deserves Another. The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections , 1977 .

[36]  M. Fiorina.  The Case of the Vanishing Marginals: The Bureaucracy Did It , 1977, American Political Science Review.

[37]  John A. Ferejohn,et al.  On the Decline of Competition in Congressional Elections , 1977, American Political Science Review.

[38]  Morris P. Fiorina,et al.  Congress, keystone of the Washington establishment , 1977 .

[39]  David R. Mayhew.  Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals , 1974, Polity.

[40]  E. Tufte.  The Relationship between Seats and Votes in Two-Party Systems , 1973, American Political Science Review.

[41]  Robert S. Erikson,et al.  Malapportionment, Gerrymandering, and Party Fortunes in Congressional Elections , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[42]  Robert S. Erikson.  The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections , 1971, Polity.

[43]  Joseph A. Schlesinger.  Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. , 1968 .