The Effects of Using an Interactive Whiteboard on the Academic Achievement of University Students.

The aim of this study was to identify the effects of the use of an interactive whiteboard on the academic achievement of university students on the topic of electricity in a science and technology laboratory class. The study was designed as a pretest/posttest control group experimental study. Mean, standard deviation and ttests were used for data analysis. An independent groups t-test was used to test for Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 12, Issue 2, Article 13, p.2 (Dec., 2011) Oktay AKBAŞ and Huseyin Mirac PEKTAŞ The effects of using an interactive whiteboard on the academic achievement of university students Copyright (C) 2011 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 12, Issue 2, Article 13 (Dec., 2011). All Rights Reserved. the differences between the pretest and posttest mean of experimental and control group. No significant difference was observed between the academic achievement of the students in the experimental group, who were taught with both interactive whiteboard and laboratory practices, and the control students, who experienced only laboratory practices. The posttest standard deviation values in the experimental group were relatively lower than those in the control group. The electric motor, electric bell, and generation of the induction current models were prepared on the computer by the researchers using Macromedia Flash 8, and its application was undertaken by the students on the interactive whiteboard (smart board). It was seen that although interactive whiteboard use might not significantly alter students’ academic achievement, it encouraged them to participate more in the lesson, created an interesting and enthusiastic atmosphere, and led to more enjoyable lessons. At the same time, many students from the experimental group stated that the interactive simulations and virtual experiments were superior to real experiments and enabled them to better visualize the topic.

[1]  Steve Higgins,et al.  Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[2]  Ali Eryilmaz,et al.  Factors Mediating the Effect of Gender on Ninth-Grade Turkish Students' Misconceptions Concerning Electric Circuits. , 2004 .

[3]  Ömer Geban,et al.  Genel lise programında yer alan kimya konularıyla ilgili derslerin müfredatlarının incelenmesi ve ders geçme sisteminin değerlendirilmesi , 1995 .

[4]  S. Higgins,et al.  The Impact of Interactive Whiteboards on Teacher--Pupil Interaction in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. , 2006 .

[5]  Katherine K. Perkins,et al.  A powerful tool for teaching science , 2006 .

[6]  D Shipstone,et al.  Electricity in Simple Circuits , 1985 .

[7]  Parental Consent Form,et al.  High School Students , 1994 .

[8]  Erol Taş,et al.  The Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction Material on Understanding Photosynthesis Subject , 2006 .

[9]  C. E. Wieman,et al.  A research-based curriculum for teaching the photoelectric effect , 2007, 0706.2165.

[10]  Yılmaz Kara,et al.  Assessing the Effects of Tutorial and Edutainment Software Programs on Students' Achievements, Misconceptions and Attitudes towards Biology. , 2007 .

[11]  Thomas Andre,et al.  Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current , 1997 .

[12]  Nilgün Yenice,et al.  Fen bilgisi derslerinde bilgisayar destekli öğretimin dersin hedeflerine ulaşma düzeyine etkisi , 2003 .

[13]  Samia Khan,et al.  ICT in Science Education: A quasi‐experimental study of achievement, attitudes toward science, and career aspirations of Korean middle school students , 2009 .

[14]  Derek Glover,et al.  PRESENTATION AND PEDAGOGY: THE EFFECTIVE USE OF INTERACTIVE WHITEBOARDS IN MATHEMATICS LESSONS , 2005 .

[15]  Salih Çepni,et al.  The effects of computer-assisted material on students' cognitive levels, misconceptions and attitudes towards science , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[16]  Ömer Geban,et al.  Fen bilgisi öğretiminde bilgisayar destekli öğretim ve geleneksel problem çözme etkinliklerinin ders başarısı bakımından karşılaştırılması , 1996 .

[17]  Mustafa Baser,et al.  Effects of Conceptual Change and Traditional Confirmatory Simulations on Pre-Service Teachers’ Understanding of Direct Current Circuits , 2006 .

[18]  C. Wieman,et al.  Teaching Physics Using PhET Simulations. , 2010 .

[19]  Ian Hall,et al.  Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[20]  James Daniel Lehman,et al.  Identification of student misconceptions in genetics problem solving via computer program , 1988 .

[21]  Serkan Yilmaz,et al.  Deneysel Desenler: Öntest-Sontest Kontrol Grubu Desen ve Veri Analizi , 2013 .

[22]  Steve Higgins,et al.  'The visual helps me understand the complicated things': pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[23]  Daniel P. Shepardson,et al.  The nature of fourth graders' understandings of electric circuits , 1994 .

[24]  Gary Beauchamp,et al.  Beyond the ‘wow’ factor: developing interactivity with the interactive whiteboard , 2005 .

[25]  Ali Eryilmaz,et al.  High school students' misconceptions about simple electric circuits , 2001 .

[26]  C. Wieman,et al.  PhET: Interactive Simulations for Teaching and Learning Physics , 2006 .