Neuromuscular-skeletal constraints on the acquisition of skill in a discrete torque production task

The organisation of the human neuromuscular-skeletal system allows an extremely wide variety of actions to be performed, often with great dexterity. Adaptations associated with skill acquisition occur at all levels of the neuromuscular-skeletal system although all neural adaptations are inevitably constrained by the organisation of the actuating apparatus (muscles and bones). We quantified the extent to which skill acquisition in an isometric task set is influenced by the mechanical properties of the muscles used to produce the required actions. Initial performance was greatly dependent upon the specific combination of torques required in each variant of the experimental task. Five consecutive days of practice improved the performance to a similar degree across eight actions despite differences in the torques required about the elbow and forearm. The proportional improvement in performance was also similar when the actions were performed at either 20 or 40% of participants’ maximum voluntary torque capacity. The skill acquired during practice was successfully extrapolated to variants of the task requiring more torque than that required during practice. We conclude that while the extent to which skill can be acquired in isometric actions is independent of the specific combination of joint torques required for target acquisition, the nature of the kinetic adaptations leading to the performance improvement in isometric actions is influenced by the neural and mechanical properties of the actuating muscles.

[1]  R Shadmehr,et al.  Spatial Generalization from Learning Dynamics of Reaching Movements , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  ter Bm Bart Haar Romeny,et al.  Behaviour of motor units of human arm muscles: differences between slow isometric contraction and relaxation , 1985 .

[4]  B. Kleiner,et al.  Distant Transfer in Coincident Timing as a Function of Variability of Practice , 1984 .

[5]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  David J Ostry,et al.  Transfer of Motor Learning across Arm Configurations , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[8]  Gerrit Jan VAN INGEN SCHENAU,et al.  From rotation to translation: Constraints on multi-joint movements and the unique action of bi-articular muscles , 1989 .

[9]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Generalization to Local Remappings of the Visuomotor Coordinate Transformation , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  G E Caldwell,et al.  Dual degree of freedom tasks: Flexion effect on supination/pronation response. , 1994, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[12]  D. Corcos,et al.  Time course and temporal order of changes in movement kinematics during learning of fast and accurate elbow flexions , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Quantifying Generalization from Trial-by-Trial Behavior of Adaptive Systems that Learn with Basis Functions: Theory and Experiments in Human Motor Control , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  G. Stelmach,et al.  A test of the schema theory of discrete motor learning. , 1977, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Parkinsonism Reduces Coordination of Fingers, Wrist, and Arm in Fine Motor Control , 1997, Experimental Neurology.

[17]  Christopher D Mah,et al.  Generalization of Object Manipulation Skills Learned without Limb Motion , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  J. C. Jamison,et al.  Muscle synergies and isometric torque production: influence of supination and pronation level on elbow flexion. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Consolidation of Dynamic Motor Learning Is Not Disrupted by rTMS of Primary Motor Cortex , 2004, Current Biology.

[20]  R. Johansson,et al.  Sensorimotor prediction and memory in object manipulation. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[21]  P. Nixon,et al.  The role of the cerebellum in preparing responses to predictable sensory events , 2008, The Cerebellum.