Analytical performance, agreement and user-friendliness of five C-reactive protein point-of-care tests

Abstract Background. Point-of-care (POC) C-reactive protein (CRP) testing is increasingly used in primary care to assist general practitioners (GPs) in the diagnostic workup for various complaints. The present study compares analytical performance, agreement and user-friendliness of five of these POC CRP tests. Methods. The following five POC CRP tests were evaluated: Afinion and NycoCard Reader II (both Alere), Eurolyser Smart 700/340 (Eurolyser), QuikRead go and QuikRead 101 (both Orion Diagnostica). Results were compared with those of a standard immunoturbidimetric method performed on a routine analyzer (Olympus AU 2700, Beckman Coulter). Analytical performance and agreement with the laboratory standard for the five different POC tests were analyzed. Subsequently, user-friendliness of the POC tests was assessed. Results. Within-day CVs varied from 2.6% (QuikRead go) to 19.4% (Eurolyser Smart 700/340) for low CRP values (< 20 mg/L), and 1.1% (QuikRead go) to 17.5% (Eurolyser Smart 700/340) for high values (> 100 mg/L). Between-day CVs varied from 4.6% (Afinion) to 30.5% (Eurolyser Smart 700/340) for low values and 4.0% (QuikRead go) to 18.0% (Eurolyser Smart 700/340) for high values. With high CRP values (> 100 mg/L) agreement with the laboratory standard systematically decreased for all POC tests. Regarding user-friendliness Afinion and Eurolyser Smart 700/340 were judged easiest to operate. Conclusions. Analytical performance, agreement, and user-friendliness of the POC CRP tests varied considerably, yet overall four devices showed adequate analytical performance and agreement.

[1]  C. Massart,et al.  Should functional sensitivity of a new thyroid stimulating hormone immunoassay be monitored routinely? The ADVIA Centaur TSH3-UL assay experience. , 2012, Clinical biochemistry.

[2]  J. Oosterheert,et al.  Evaluating the evidence for the implementation of C-reactive protein measurement in adult patients with suspected lower respiratory tract infection in primary care: a systematic review. , 2012, Family practice.

[3]  G. Lippi,et al.  Analytical performance of the new ACL AcuStar HemosIL D-Dimer , 2012, Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis.

[4]  R. Hopstaken,et al.  C-reactive protein point of care testing and physician communication skills training for lower respiratory tract infections in general practice: economic evaluation of a cluster randomized trial. , 2011, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[5]  A. Hoes,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy and user-friendliness of 5 point-of-care D-dimer tests for the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis. , 2010, Clinical chemistry.

[6]  C. Maurer,et al.  Diagnostic Value of Inflammation Markers in Predicting Perforation in Acute Sigmoid Diverticulitis , 2010, World Journal of Surgery.

[7]  Kerenza Hood,et al.  Effect of point of care testing for C reactive protein and training in communication skills on antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections: cluster randomised trial , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Tom Fahey,et al.  C-reactive protein and community-acquired pneumonia in ambulatory care: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies. , 2008, Family practice.

[9]  R. Andersson,et al.  The Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score: A Tool for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis that Outperforms the Alvarado Score , 2008, World Journal of Surgery.

[10]  W. Assendelft,et al.  Diagnostic value of C reactive protein in infections of the lower respiratory tract: systematic review , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  R. Hopstaken,et al.  Contributions of symptoms, signs, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein to a diagnosis of pneumonia in acute lower respiratory tract infection. , 2003, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[12]  D. Seamark,et al.  Field-testing and validation in a primary care setting of a point-of-care test for C-reactive protein , 2003, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[13]  Dietmar Stöckl,et al.  Application of the Bland-Altman plot for interpretation of method-comparison studies: a critical investigation of its practice. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[14]  R. Elswick,et al.  Effect of serum-clot contact time on clinical chemistry laboratory results. , 1998, Clinical chemistry.

[15]  P H Petersen,et al.  Evaluation of a near-patient test for C-reactive protein used in daily routine in primary healthcare by use of difference plots. , 1997, Clinical chemistry.

[16]  R. Holder,et al.  Reliability and feasibility of a near patient test for C-reactive protein in primary care. , 1996, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[17]  D. Altman,et al.  Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading , 1995, The Lancet.

[18]  G. Dinant,et al.  Reliability of C-reactive protein measurement in general practice in The Netherlands. , 1994, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[19]  C. Fraser,et al.  Biological Variation of Acute Phase Proteins , 1993, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[20]  P. Urdal,et al.  Rapid immunometric measurement of C-reactive protein in whole blood. , 1992, Clinical chemistry.

[21]  P. Urdal,et al.  C-reactive protein: a new rapid assay for managing infectious disease in primary health care. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[22]  J. Burgers,et al.  [Summary of the Dutch College of General Practitioners' (NHG) practice guideline 'ADHD in children']. , 2015, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[23]  R. Hopstaken,et al.  [Summary of NHG practice guideline 'Acute cough']. , 2012, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[24]  N. D. de Wit,et al.  [Summary of the Dutch College of General Practitioners (NHG) practice guideline on 'Diverticulitis']. , 2012, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[25]  C. Romagnoli,et al.  Reliability of two different bedside assays for C-reactive protein in newborn infants , 2009, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[26]  M. Berger,et al.  Point-of-care C-reactive protein testing in febrile children in general practice , 2006, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[27]  S. Esposito,et al.  Evaluation of a rapid bedside test for the quantitative determination of C-reactive protein , 2005, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[28]  T. Kühnert,et al.  Einfluß der Citratkonzentration im Blutentnahmeröhrchen auf hämostaseologische Meßgrößen. Influence of the Sample Tube’s Citrate Concentration on Coagulation Analytes , 2001 .

[29]  R. Tracy,et al.  Variability in the measurement of C-reactive protein in healthy subjects: implications for reference intervals and epidemiological applications. , 1997, Clinical chemistry.