Effects of Feedback Sign on Group Goal Setting, Strategies, and Performance

Previous research on the effects of feedback sign on goal setting and performance at the individual level suggests that individuals who receive negative feedback perform at higher-levels and set higher goals than individuals who receive positive feedback. However, little research has been conducted to examine the effects of feedback sign on group goals and performance. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of feedback sign on group goal setting, strategy development, and task performance. Fifty-nine, three-person groups participated in a group word recognition task. Groups were exposed to either positive or negative feedback after completing the task. They were then asked to write down their strategies as a group and to perform the task a second time. The results suggested that, although groups that received negative feedback were less satisfied, these groups set higher goals, developed more strategies, and performed at higher levels than groups that received positive feedback Exploratory path analysis of the data also suggested that both feedback sign and performance at Tune 1 had an indirect effect on performance through group goals.

[1]  R. Saavedra,et al.  Complex interdependence in task-performing groups , 1993 .

[2]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  The dynamics of implicit theories of group performance: When and how do they operate? , 1991 .

[3]  Henry L. Tosi A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[4]  Laurie R. Weingart,et al.  Processes That Mediate the Relationship Between a Group Goal and Group Member Performance , 1991 .

[5]  E. Weldon,et al.  Processes that mediate the relationship between a group goal and improved group performance. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  T. Mitchell,et al.  Individual and group goals when workers are interdependent: Effects on task strategies and performance. , 1990 .

[7]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  IMPACT OF PROCESS AND OUTCOME FEEDBACK ON THE RELATION OF GOAL SETTING TO TASK PERFORMANCE , 1990 .

[8]  Philip M. Podsakoff,et al.  Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance , 1989 .

[9]  H. Klein,et al.  An Integrated Control Theory Model of Work Motivation , 1989 .

[10]  T. Connolly,et al.  Goals, strategy development and task performance: Some limits on the efficacy of goal setting , 1989 .

[11]  Steven D. Jones,et al.  Effects of group feedback, goal setting, and incentives on organizational productivity. , 1988 .

[12]  Tamao Matsui,et al.  Effects of goals and feedback on performance in groups. , 1987 .

[13]  Robert P. Steel,et al.  A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966-1984 , 1987 .

[14]  P. Hanges,et al.  A control system model of organizational motivation: Theoretical development and applied implications , 1987 .

[15]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Distancing after group success and failure: Basking in reflected glory and cutting off reflected failure. , 1986 .

[16]  M. E. Tubbs,et al.  Goal setting: A meta-analytic examination of the empirical evidence. , 1986 .

[17]  A. Bandura,et al.  Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation , 1986, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

[18]  P. Buller,et al.  Effects of Team Building and Goal Setting on Productivity: A Field Experiment , 1986 .

[19]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Implicit theories and the evaluation of group process and performance , 1986 .

[20]  G. S. Taylor,et al.  An Examination of Conflicting Findings on the Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Absenteeism: A Meta-Analysis , 1985 .

[21]  A. Jacobs,et al.  "Sandwiching" Complex Interpersonal Feedback , 1985 .

[22]  Vandra L. Huber,et al.  Effects of task difficulty, goal setting, and strategy on performance of a heuristic task. , 1985 .

[23]  Donelson R. Forsyth,et al.  The impact of inhibiting or facilitating causal factors on group members' reactions after success and failure , 1984 .

[24]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. , 1984 .

[25]  A. Bandura,et al.  Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. , 1983 .

[26]  Akinori Okada,et al.  Mechanism of feedback affecting task performance , 1983 .

[27]  R. H. Waterman,et al.  In search of excellence : lessons from America's best-run companies , 1983 .

[28]  M. A. Campion,et al.  A control systems conceptualization of the goal-setting and changing process , 1982 .

[29]  A. Denisi,et al.  Level and Source of Feedback as Determinants of Feedback Effectiveness. , 1982 .

[30]  C. Carver,et al.  Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior , 1981 .

[31]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. , 1981 .

[32]  R. Festinger Retrospections on Social Psychology , 1980 .

[33]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Developing a Feedback System for Work Units: A Field Experiment in Structural Change , 1980 .

[34]  James L. Koch,et al.  Effects of Goal Specificity and Performance Feedback to Work Groups on Peer Leadership, Performance, and Attitudes , 1979 .

[35]  David A. Nadler,et al.  The effects of feedback on task group behavior: A review of the experimental research , 1979 .

[36]  A. Zander,et al.  Groups at work , 1979 .

[37]  W. Mobley,et al.  Review and Conceptual Analysis of the Employee Turnover Process , 1979 .

[38]  Gerald D Emmert,et al.  MEASURING THE IMPACT OF GROUP PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK VERSUS INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK IN AN INDUSTRIAL SETTING , 1978 .

[39]  L. J. Becker Joint effect of feedback and goal setting on performance: a field study of residential energy conservation , 1978 .

[40]  M. Seligman,et al.  Learned helplessness: Theory and evidence. , 1976 .

[41]  G. Latham,et al.  A Review of Research on the Application of Goal Setting in Organizations , 1975 .

[42]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .

[43]  D. Byrne The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[44]  A. Zander,et al.  The group level of aspiration and external social pressures , 1971 .

[45]  A. Zander,et al.  Motives and goals in groups , 1971 .

[46]  M. E. Shaw Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[47]  A. Lott,et al.  Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: a review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[48]  A. Zander,et al.  Individual and Group Levels of Aspiration , 1963 .

[49]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  Effects of Performance Evaluations on Group Integration and Motivation , 1957 .

[50]  A. Zander,et al.  Group dynamics, research and theory , 1955 .