Human exploration patterns in unknown, time-sensitive environments

Exploration of unknown environments has numerous applications in the domains of search and rescue, pursuit-evasion, map building, and military espionage and intelligence gathering. While it is ideal to have autonomous robots search intelligently based on global patterns and features of each environment, such learning algorithms should also be informed by, and perform at least as well as, human exploration. Most autonomous exploration algorithms focus on local and greedy choices and are less concerned with learning to recognize structural features of environments in order to improve global exploration performance. If the strategies people use during exploration can be determined, they can be used as a basis for creating good utility functions for autonomous robots to be optimized by machine learning techniques. Here, we perform a study where human participants explore both random and patterned environments, in two different time-sensitive scenarios, in an attempt to determine what strategies people use to maximize area explored under a variety of cases. We found that participants in a controlled study did in fact adapt their exploration strategies in time-sensitive scenarios and also exploited features of the environments in order to achieve better global exploration performance.

[1]  Gregory Dudek,et al.  Multi-Robot Exploration of an Unknown Environment, Efficiently Reducing the Odometry Error , 1997, IJCAI.

[2]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Exploring Unknown Environments with Mobile Robots using Coverage Maps , 2003, IJCAI.

[3]  Rafael Murrieta-Cid,et al.  Planning exploration strategies for simultaneous localization and mapping , 2006, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[4]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  Bringing Together Human and Robotic Environment Representations - A Pilot Study , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[5]  Nicola Basilico,et al.  Exploration Strategies based on Multi-Criteria Decision Making for an Autonomous Mobile Robot , 2009, ECMR.

[6]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Speeding-up multi-robot exploration by considering semantic place information , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[7]  Angela J. Yu,et al.  Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  R. Kitchin,et al.  Cognitive maps: What are they and why study them? , 1994 .

[9]  Ning Xi,et al.  Coordinated multi-robot real-time exploration with connectivity and bandwidth awareness , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  B. Poucet Spatial cognitive maps in animals: new hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms. , 1993, Psychological review.

[11]  E. Tolman Cognitive maps in rats and men. , 1948, Psychological review.

[12]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  Cognitive maps for mobile robots - an object based approach , 2007, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[13]  Alan C. Schultz,et al.  Mobile robot exploration and map-building with continuous localization , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[14]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Coordinated multi-robot exploration , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[15]  Gregory Dudek,et al.  Graph-Based Exploration using Multiple Robots , 2000, DARS.

[16]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Cognitive Maps, Cognitive Collages, and Spatial Mental Models , 1993, COSIT.

[17]  Tucker R. Balch,et al.  Efficient Bids on Task Allocation for Multi-Robot Exploration , 2006, FLAIRS Conference.

[18]  J. L. Gould The Locale Map of Honey Bees: Do Insects Have Cognitive Maps? , 1986, Science.