The Geometry of the Distance Coefficient in Gravity Equations in International Trade

Gravity equations in trade imply that trade flows are proportional to the size of a country and inversely proportional to distance. This paper develops the analogy of gravity in physics with gravity in trade and provides geometric intuition for a large class of mathematical processes in two‐dimensional space for which these relationships would be expected. This model implies that distances between countries in empirical gravity estimations should be measured as weighted harmonic means of pairwise distances of local economic activity.

[1]  K. Head,et al.  The Puzzling Persistence of the Distance Effect on Bilateral Trade , 2004, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[2]  Nicolas E. Humphries,et al.  Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour , 2008, Nature.

[3]  Jason L. Dedrick,et al.  Who Profits from Innovation in Global Value Chains? A Study of the iPod and Notebook PCs , 2010 .

[4]  Y. Yotov A simple solution to the distance puzzle in international trade , 2012 .

[5]  A. Venables,et al.  Spiders and Snakes: Offshoring and Agglomeration in the Global Economy , 2010 .

[6]  James E. Anderson,et al.  Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle , 2001 .

[7]  T. Geisel,et al.  The scaling laws of human travel , 2006, Nature.

[8]  Guy Michaels,et al.  Resetting the Urban Network: 117–2012 , 2013 .

[9]  Roc Armenter,et al.  A Balls-and-Bins Model of Trade , 2010 .

[10]  D. Whittaker,et al.  Not in New Zealand's waters, surely? Linking labour issues to GPNs , 2014 .

[11]  Robert C. Johnson,et al.  Accounting for intermediates: Production sharing and trade in value added , 2012 .

[12]  Ferdinand Rauch,et al.  Cities as spatial clusters , 2013 .

[13]  Keith Head,et al.  What Separates Us? Sources of Resistance to Globalization (Qu'est‐ce qui nous sépare? Sources de résistance à la mondialisation) , 2013 .

[14]  David Hummels,et al.  Trade Responses to Geographic Frictions: A Decomposition Using Micro-Data , 2005 .

[15]  X. Gabaix Zipf's Law for Cities: An Explanation , 1999 .

[16]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  Technology, Geography, and Trade , 2002 .

[17]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Revisiting Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses, bumblebees and deer , 2007, Nature.

[18]  Kei-Mu Yi,et al.  Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade? , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  H. Stanley,et al.  Optimizing the success of random searches , 1999, Nature.

[20]  Marcelo Olarreaga,et al.  There Goes Gravity: eBay and the Death of Distance , 2016 .

[21]  Thomas Chaney,et al.  The Gravity Equation in International Trade: An Explanation , 2013, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  S. Evenett,et al.  On Theories Explaining the Success of the Gravity Equation , 1998, Journal of Political Economy.

[23]  M. Levandowsky,et al.  Chemosensory Responses of Acanthamoeba castellanii: Visual Analysis of Random Movement and Responses to Chemical Signals , 1996, The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology.

[24]  S. Dorn,et al.  Maximum foraging ranges in solitary bees: only few individuals have the capability to cover long foraging distances , 2010 .

[25]  Paul S. Armington A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production (Une théorie de la demande de produits différenciés d'après leur origine) (Una teoría de la demanda de productos distinguiéndolos según el lugar de producción) , 1969 .

[26]  Anders Åkerman,et al.  The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity: An Empirical Investigation , 2007 .

[27]  Alan Kirman,et al.  Ants, Rationality, and Recruitment , 1993 .