A biomechatronical transtibial prosthesis powered by pleated pneumatic artificial muscles

Due to its high power-to-weight ratio, a pleated pneumatic artificial muscle (PPAM) offers an interesting alternative actuation source for robotic devices. Its inherent compliant behaviour excites another broad field of interest: assistive clinical devices such as powered exoskeletons and prosthetics. In this paper, the design of a pneumatically powered transtibial prosthetic device is presented. A first prototype has been built and provides a preliminary test bed for control algorithm development and testing with able-bodied subjects in laboratory conditions. The characteristics and working principle of a PPAM are described. The design specifications and the mechanical model of the prosthesis are discussed. The mechanical design and the control structure are outlined. Furthermore, some initial walking trials with an able-bodied subject wearing the prosthesis prototype are presented and discussed.

[1]  J Perry,et al.  Efficiency of dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[2]  J. Perry,et al.  Energy expenditure during ambulation in dysvascular and traumatic below-knee amputees: a comparison of five prosthetic feet. , 1995, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[3]  Richard A. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[4]  Alfred D. Grant.  Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function , 2010 .

[5]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Second generation pleated pneumatic artificial muscle and its robotic applications , 2006, Adv. Robotics.

[6]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF PROSTHETIC FEET ON BELOW-KNEE AMPUTEE WALKING , 1991, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[7]  J Perry,et al.  The influence of lower-extremity muscle force on gait characteristics in individuals with below-knee amputations secondary to vascular disease. , 1996, Physical therapy.

[8]  Jun-Ho Oh,et al.  Development of an above knee prosthesis using MR damper and leg simulator , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[9]  J E Edelstein.  Prosthetic feet. State of the Art. , 1988, Physical therapy.

[10]  J. van den Berg,et al.  Calf muscle moment, work and efficiency in level walking; role of series elasticity. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Sandra J. Olney,et al.  Kinematic and Kinetic Variations of Below-Knee Amputee Gait , 2002 .

[12]  T. Kepple,et al.  Relative contributions of the lower extremity joint moments to forward progression and support during gait , 1997 .

[13]  J. Perry,et al.  Prosthetic weight acceptance mechanics in transtibial amputees wearing the Single Axis, Seattle Lite, and Flex Foot. , 1997, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  R. Waters,et al.  Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  Ian David Loram,et al.  Direct measurement of human ankle stiffness during quiet standing: the intrinsic mechanical stiffness is insufficient for stability , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  J Perry,et al.  Below-knee amputee gait with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet: a pilot study. , 1990, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[17]  S. Naumann,et al.  ANALYSIS OF MECHANICAL AND METABOLIC FACTORS IN THE GAIT OF CONGENITAL BELOW KNEE AMPUTEES: A Comparison of the SACH and Seattle Feet , 1992, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[18]  E. Ayyappa,et al.  Influence of prosthetic foot design on sound limb loading in adults with unilateral below-knee amputations. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  S. Gard,et al.  The human ankle during walking: implications for design of biomimetic ankle prostheses. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  An ankle-foot emulation system for the study of human walking biomechanics , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[21]  D. Shurr,et al.  Comparison of Energy Cost and Gait Efficiency During Ambulation in Below-Knee Amputees Using Different Prosthetic Feet—A Preliminary Report , 1988 .

[22]  Dirk Lefeber,et al.  The Concept and Design of Pleated Pneumatic Artificial Muscles , 2001 .

[23]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Enhanced dynamic performance in pneumatic muscle actuators , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[24]  M. Latash,et al.  Joint stiffness: Myth or reality? , 1993 .

[25]  R. Seymour.  Prosthetics and orthotics : lower limb and spinal , 2002 .

[26]  R. Kram,et al.  Energy cost and muscular activity required for propulsion during walking. , 2003, Journal of applied physiology.

[27]  G. Johnson.  Control of Movement for the Physically Disabled , 2001 .

[28]  N. H. Molen.  Energy/speed relation of below-knee amputees walking on a motor-driven treadmill , 1973, Internationale Zeitschrift für angewandte Physiologie einschließlich Arbeitsphysiologie.

[29]  Michael Lars Palmer,et al.  Sagittal plane characterization of normal human ankle function across a range of walking gait speeds , 2002 .

[30]  Dirk Lefeber,et al.  Pneumatic artificial muscles: Actuators for robotics and automation , 2002 .

[31]  R. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .