Application of real-time machine learning to myoelectric prosthesis control: A case series in adaptive switching

Background: Myoelectric prostheses currently used by amputees can be difficult to control. Machine learning, and in particular learned predictions about user intent, could help to reduce the time and cognitive load required by amputees while operating their prosthetic device. Objectives: The goal of this study was to compare two switching-based methods of controlling a myoelectric arm: non-adaptive (or conventional) control and adaptive control (involving real-time prediction learning). Study design: Case series study. Methods: We compared non-adaptive and adaptive control in two different experiments. In the first, one amputee and one non-amputee subject controlled a robotic arm to perform a simple task; in the second, three able-bodied subjects controlled a robotic arm to perform a more complex task. For both tasks, we calculated the mean time and total number of switches between robotic arm functions over three trials. Results: Adaptive control significantly decreased the number of switches and total switching time for both tasks compared with the conventional control method. Conclusion: Real-time prediction learning was successfully used to improve the control interface of a myoelectric robotic arm during uninterrupted use by an amputee subject and able-bodied subjects. Clinical relevance Adaptive control using real-time prediction learning has the potential to help decrease both the time and the cognitive load required by amputees in real-world functional situations when using myoelectric prostheses.

[1]  R. S. Sutton,et al.  Dynamic switching and real-time machine learning for improved human control of assistive biomedical robots , 2012, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[2]  S Micera,et al.  Control of Hand Prostheses Using Peripheral Information , 2010, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  B Hudgins,et al.  Myoelectric signal processing for control of powered limb prostheses. , 2006, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[4]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Myoelectric forearm prostheses: state of the art from a user-centered perspective. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  D. Linden From Molecules to Memory in the Cerebellum , 2003, Science.

[6]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Time-Derivative Models of Pavlovian Reinforcement , 1990 .

[7]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[8]  A. Redish,et al.  The Mind within the Brain: How We Make Decisions and How those Decisions Go Wrong , 2013 .

[9]  M. R. Dawson,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF THE BENTO ARM : AN IMPROVED ROBOTIC ARM FOR MYOELECTRIC TRAINING AND RESEARCH , 2014 .

[10]  Patrick M. Pilarski,et al.  Adaptive artificial limbs: a real-time approach to prediction and anticipation , 2013, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[11]  Albert H Vette,et al.  Normative data for modified Box and Blocks test measuring upper-limb function via motion capture. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  Barbara Caputo,et al.  Improving Control of Dexterous Hand Prostheses Using Adaptive Learning , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[13]  M. Gabriel,et al.  Learning and Computational Neuroscience: Foundations of Adaptive Networks , 1990 .

[14]  Farbod Fahimi,et al.  The Development of a Myoelectric Training Tool for Above-Elbow Amputees , 2012, The open biomedical engineering journal.

[15]  Patrick M. Pilarski,et al.  Real-time prediction learning for the simultaneous actuation of multiple prosthetic joints , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[16]  Patrick M. Pilarski,et al.  Horde: a scalable real-time architecture for learning knowledge from unsupervised sensorimotor interaction , 2011, AAMAS.

[17]  L. Resnik,et al.  Advanced upper limb prosthetic devices: implications for upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  Panagiotis K. Artemiadis,et al.  Proceedings of the first workshop on Peripheral Machine Interfaces: going beyond traditional surface electromyography , 2014, Front. Neurorobot..

[19]  Erik Scheme,et al.  Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[20]  T Walley Williams,et al.  Progress on stabilizing and controlling powered upper-limb prostheses. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[21]  Patrick M. Pilarski,et al.  Temporal-Difference Learning to Assist Human Decision Making during the Control of an Artificial Limb , 2013, ArXiv.

[22]  Blair A. Lock,et al.  Adaptive Pattern Recognition of Myoelectric Signals: Exploration of Conceptual Framework and Practical Algorithms , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[23]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Perspectives and problems in motor learning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.