Limits to responsible innovation

ABSTRACTResponsible Innovation (RI) is a young field of research that has nevertheless had remarkable successes in dissemination within academic and political circles. However, there is relatively little awareness of its limits, blind spots and situations in which it cannot be used for actual innovation trajectories. Without such awareness, there is a risk that RI may get hollowed out and turned into a tool for ‘greenwashing’. To examine RI’s limits, we present a case study on biofuel innovation in Hassan, South India. This case study demonstrates that there are important barriers that may make it difficult to conduct innovation according to RI values. In particular, we highlight the following factors that emerge from our case study and need more attention in order to be included and adequately theorised in the RI literature: material barriers to innovation, engagement with abandoning or reducing existing practices as a consequence of innovation, power differences and dependencies, (un)clear demarcation o...

[1]  G. Rist.  The History of Development: From Western Origins to Global Faith , 2019 .

[2]  Norbert K. Semmer,et al.  Taking the chance: Core self-evaluations predict relative gain in job resources following turnover , 2016, SpringerPlus.

[3]  E. Forsberg,et al.  Social Life Cycle Assessment as a resource for Responsible Research and Innovation , 2016 .

[4]  H. van den Belt,et al.  Once the rockets are up, who should care where they come down? The problem of responsibility ascription for the negative consequences of biofuel innovations , 2016, SpringerPlus.

[5]  Fabien Medvecky,et al.  Innovation for a steady state: a case for responsible stagnation , 2016 .

[6]  Bert-Jaap Koops.  The Concepts, Approaches, and Applications of Responsible Innovation. An Introduction , 2015 .

[7]  J. O. Kroesen,et al.  Capacities, Development and Responsible Innovation , 2015 .

[8]  Michael E. Gorman,et al.  Mapping the integrative field: taking stock of socio-technical collaborations , 2015 .

[9]  T. Li.  What is land? Assembling a resource for global investment , 2014 .

[10]  Hira Amin,et al.  The History of Development: From Western Origins to Global Faith , 2014 .

[11]  J. D. Haan,et al.  Conceptualizing Responsible Innovation in Craft Villages in Vietnam , 2014 .

[12]  J. D. Haan,et al.  Understanding Responsible Innovation in Small Producers’ Clusters in Vietnam through Actor-Network Theory , 2014, The European Journal of Development Research.

[13]  Jennifer Baka.  What wastelands? A critique of biofuel policy discourse in South India , 2014 .

[14]  V. Blok.  Look who's talking: responsible innovation, the paradox of dialogue and the voice of the other in communication and negotiation processes , 2014 .

[15]  Adalberto Mantovani Martiniano de Azevedo,et al.  Responsible innovation across borders: tensions, paradoxes and possibilities , 2014 .

[16]  M. Oudheusden.  Where are the politics in responsible innovation? European governance, technology assessments, and beyond , 2014 .

[17]  Eefje Cuppen,et al.  Responsible innovation as an endorsement of public values: the need for interdisciplinary research , 2014 .

[18]  Ian Forbes,et al.  Corporate-Led Sustainable Development and Energy Poverty Alleviation at the Bottom of the Pyramid: The Case of the CleanCook in Nigeria , 2013 .

[19]  P. Sandøe,et al.  Bioenergy and Land Use: Framing the Ethical Debate , 2012 .

[20]  L. Levidow,et al.  Neoliberalising technoscience and environment: EU policy for competitive, sustainable biofuels , 2012 .

[21]  P. Andersen,et al.  Weaving a strategy and business model for a BoP market: The case of Grundfos LIFELINK , 2012 .

[22]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  Jatropha cultivation in southern India: assessing farmers' experiences , 2012 .

[23]  B. Bovenkerk,et al.  The Biotechnology Debate: Democracy in the Face of Intractable Disagreement , 2012 .

[24]  R. V. Schomberg.  Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields , 2011 .

[25]  E. Derclaye.  Eudemonic Intellectual Property: Patents and Related Rights as Engines of Happiness, Peace and Sustainability , 2011 .

[26]  P. Kant,et al.  The extraordinary collapse of Jatropha as a global biofuel. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  Fahri Yetim,et al.  Bringing Discourse Ethics to Value Sensitive Design: Pathways toward a Deliberative Future , 2011 .

[28]  Sjoerd Zwart,et al.  The Problem of Many Hands: Climate Change as an Example , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[29]  Giorgos Kallis,et al.  The political ecology of Jatropha plantations for biodiesel in Tamil Nadu, India , 2010 .

[30]  Noëmi Manders-Huits,et al.  What Values in Design? The Challenge of Incorporating Moral Values into Design , 2010, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[31]  J. Law.  Actor-network theory and material semiotics , 2009 .

[32]  T. Li.  Social reproduction, situated politics, and The Will to Improve , 2008 .

[33]  Gabrielle Durepos.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[34]  Deepak Rajagopal,et al.  Implications of India's biofuel policies for food, water and the poor , 2008 .

[35]  G. Wolff.  Calculating constant-reliability water supply unit costs , 2008 .

[36]  M. Callon.  An Essay on the Growing Contribution of Economic Markets to the Proliferation of the Social , 2007 .

[37]  Arie Rip,et al.  Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: Patterns of Moral Argumentation About New and Emerging Science and Technology , 2007 .

[38]  Victoria A. Beard,et al.  Community Driven Development, Collective Action and Elite Capture in Indonesia , 2007 .

[39]  Kai N. Lee.  Sustainability: A Philosophy of Adaptive Ecosystem Management , 2006 .

[40]  Audley Genus,et al.  On Constructive Technology Assessment and Limitations on Public Participation in Technology Assessment , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[41]  S. Chambers.  Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation , 2004 .

[42]  Todd Meyers,et al.  The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice , 2004 .

[43]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid , 2004 .

[44]  A. Mol.  The Body Multiple , 2003 .

[45]  C. Mouffe.  Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism , 2000 .

[46]  T. Panayotou.  Economic Growth and the Environment , 2000 .

[47]  David Hulme,et al.  Process Approaches to Development: Theory and Sri Lankan Practice , 1999 .

[48]  A. Mol.  Ontological Politics. A Word and Some Questions , 1999 .

[49]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[50]  D. Korten.  Community Organization and Rural Development : A Learning Process Approach , 1980 .

[51]  M. Lessnoff.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[52]  Fernando Casado Cañeque,et al.  Base of the pyramid 3.0 : sustainable development through innovation & entrepreneurship , 2015 .

[53]  Andri D. Setiawan,et al.  Responsible innovation in practice : the adoption of solar PV in telecom towers in Indonesia , 2015 .

[54]  Aj Annelies Balkema,et al.  Biofuels ; sustainable innovation or gold rush? : identifying responsibilities for biofuel innovations , 2015 .

[55]  S. Fritz,et al.  Constructing landscapes of value: Capitalist investment for the acquisition of marginal or unused land. The case of Tanzania , 2015 .

[56]  V. Blok,et al.  The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why It Is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation , 2015 .

[57]  Jeroen van den Hoven,et al.  Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications , 2015 .

[58]  J. Hoven.  Responsible Innovation: A New Look at Technology and Ethics , 2014 .

[59]  S. Davies,et al.  On Being Responsible: Multiplicity in Responsible Development , 2014 .

[60]  Les Levidow,et al.  EU criteria for sustainable biofuels: accounting for carbon, depoliticising plunder , 2013 .

[61]  Ha Henny Romijn,et al.  Jatropha sustainability assessment, data from Tanzania, Mali and Mozambique , 2013 .

[62]  S. Borras,et al.  Global Land Grabbing and Trajectories of Agrarian Change: A Preliminary Analysis , 2012 .

[63]  Prem S. Bindraban,et al.  Can biofuels be sustainable by 2020? An assessment for an obligatory blending target of 10% in the Netherlands , 2012 .

[64]  B. Bovenkerk,et al.  The Biotechnology Debate , 2012 .

[65]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  Do Economists Make Markets?: On the Performativity of Economics , 2007 .

[66]  Johan R. Norberg.  In Defence of Global Capitalism , 2005 .

[67]  B. Latour,et al.  Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy , 1999 .

[68]  Gilbert Rist,et al.  The history of development , 1997 .

[69]  Robert E. Evenson,et al.  Technological change and technology strategy , 1994 .

[70]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  The emergence of post-normal science , 1993 .

[71]  M. Callon.  The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle , 1986 .

[72]  A. Buyx,et al.  Ethical issues , 1975 .