Team Negotiation: Social, Epistemic, Economic, and Psychological Consequences of Subgroup Conflict

Large collectives (e.g., organizations, political parties, nations) are seldom unitary players. Rather, they consist of different subgroups that often have conflicting interests. Nonetheless, negotiation research consistently regards negotiating teams, who represent these collectives, as monolithic parties with uniform interests. This article integrates concepts from social psychology, management, political science, and behavioral game theory to explore the effects of subgroup conflict on team negotiation. Specifically, the present research introduced a conflict of interests within negotiating teams and investigated how this internal conflict affects the outcome of the negotiation between teams. An experiment with 80 four-person teams found that conflict between subgroups had a detrimental effect on the performance of negotiating teams. This research also employed a recent model of motivated information processing in groups to investigate possible processes underlying the effect of subgroup conflict on team negotiation.

[1]  F. Reid.  Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory , 1987 .

[2]  D. Hambrick,et al.  FACTIONAL GROUPS: A NEW VANTAGE ON DEMOGRAPHIC FAULTLINES, CONFLICT, AND DISINTEGRATION IN WORK TEAMS , 2005 .

[3]  K. Fiedler,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2002 .

[4]  G. Bornstein,et al.  Perceiving Intergroup Conflict: From Game Models to Mental Templates , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[5]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  Extending the Faultline Model to Geographically Dispersed Teams: How Colocated Subgroups can Impair Group Functioning , 2006 .

[6]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Hide and seek: the effects of revealing one's personal interests in intra‐ and intergroup negotiations , 2006 .

[7]  Mark Rubin,et al.  Intergroup bias. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  James K. Sebenius,et al.  Negotiation analysis: a characterization and review , 1992 .

[9]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Interactions Within Groups and Subgroups: The Effects of Demographic Faultlines , 2005 .

[10]  J. Rubin,et al.  Negotiation , 1983 .

[11]  D. Cremer,et al.  Social identification effects in social dilemmas : a transformation of motives , 1999 .

[12]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: a meta-analytic review and test of two theories. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Peter J. Carnevale,et al.  Positive Effects of Within‐Group Cooperation on Between‐Group Negotiation1 , 1989 .

[14]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. , 1986 .

[15]  R. Dawes,et al.  A Conceptual Review of Decision Making in Social Dilemmas: Applying a Logic of Appropriateness , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[16]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[17]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model , 2000 .

[18]  Simone Moran,et al.  When performance goals deter performance: Transfer of skills in integrative negotiations , 2004 .

[19]  M. Wesson,et al.  Psychological collectivism: a measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[21]  R. Scott Tindale,et al.  Group vs Individual Performance in Mixed-Motive Situations: Exploring an Inconsistency , 2002 .

[22]  G. Bornstein.  A Classification of Games by Player Type , 2008 .

[23]  Leigh Thompson,et al.  Negotiating teams: A levels of analysis approach. , 2001 .

[24]  Gary Bornstein,et al.  Intergroup Conflict: Individual, Group, and Collective Interests , 2003, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[25]  S. Worchel,et al.  Psychology of intergroup relations , 1986 .

[26]  Terry L. Boles,et al.  Share and Share Alike or Winner Take All?: The Influence of Social Value Orientation upon Choice and Recall of Negotiation Heuristics. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[27]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Shared Cognition as a Product of, and Precursor to, Shared Identity in Negotiations , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[28]  R. Putnam.  Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games , 1988, International Organization.

[29]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[30]  Jacob Shamir,et al.  Public Opinion in the Israeli-Palestinian Two-Level Game , 2005 .

[31]  Nir Halevy,et al.  “In-Group Love” and “Out-Group Hate” as Motives for Individual Participation in Intergroup Conflict , 2008, Psychological science.

[32]  D. Campbell.  Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities , 2007 .

[33]  Bianca Beersma,et al.  Majority and minority influence in group negotiation: the moderating effects of social motivation and decision rules. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Motivated information processing, strategic choice, and the quality of negotiated agreement. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  B. Lickel,et al.  Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making , 2008, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[37]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[38]  Gary Bornstein,et al.  The free-rider problem in intergroup conflicts over step-level and continuous public goods. , 1992 .

[39]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[40]  Hillary Anger Elfenbein,et al.  What Do People Value When They Negotiate? Mapping the Domain of Subjective Value in Negotiation , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  Intergroup Negotiations , 1996 .

[42]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[43]  Colin Camerer.  Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[44]  Larry Crump.  For the sake of the team: Unity and disunity in a multiparty Major League baseball negotiation , 2005 .

[45]  H. Tajfel.  Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[46]  Sonia Roccas,et al.  The paradox of group-based guilt: modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group's moral violations. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  Uri Gneezy,et al.  Price Competition Between Teams , 2002 .

[48]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[49]  Jack L. Vevea,et al.  Beyond the group mind: a quantitative review of the interindividual-intergroup discontinuity effect. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[50]  Leigh Thompson,et al.  The role of the self-concept and the social context in determining the behavior of power holders: self-construal in intergroup versus dyadic dispute resolution negotiations. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  M. Brewer,et al.  Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[53]  Erika D Peterson,et al.  Team Negotiation: An Examination of Integrative and Distributive Bargaining , 1996 .

[54]  P. Carnevale,et al.  Motivational Bases Of Information Processing and Strategy in Conflict and Negotiation , 2003 .

[55]  L. Thompson,et al.  THE INFORMATION DILEMMA IN NEGOTIATIONS: EFFECTS OF EXPERIENCE, INCENTIVES, AND INTEGRATIVE POTENTIAL , 1999 .

[56]  C. Earley,et al.  Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. , 2000 .

[57]  L. Thompson.  Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. , 1990 .

[58]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group performance and decision making. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[59]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[60]  Lisa Hisae Nishii,et al.  Negotiating Rationally: The Dynamics of the Relational-Self in Negotiations , 2017 .