Computer-Aided Detection of Prostate Cancer in MRI

Prostate cancer is one of the major causes of cancer death for men in the western world. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is being increasingly used as a modality to detect prostate cancer. Therefore, computer-aided detection of prostate cancer in MRI images has become an active area of research. In this paper we investigate a fully automated computer-aided detection system which consists of two stages. In the first stage, we detect initial candidates using multi-atlas-based prostate segmentation, voxel feature extraction, classification and local maxima detection. The second stage segments the candidate regions and using classification we obtain cancer likelihoods for each candidate. Features represent pharmacokinetic behavior, symmetry and appearance, among others. The system is evaluated on a large consecutive cohort of 347 patients with MR-guided biopsy as the reference standard. This set contained 165 patients with cancer and 182 patients without prostate cancer. Performance evaluation is based on lesion-based free-response receiver operating characteristic curve and patient-based receiver operating characteristic analysis. The system is also compared to the prospective clinical performance of radiologists. Results show a sensitivity of 0.42, 0.75, and 0.89 at 0.1, 1, and 10 false positives per normal case. In clinical workflow the system could potentially be used to improve the sensitivity of the radiologist. At the high specificity reading setting, which is typical in screening situations, the system does not perform significantly different from the radiologist and could be used as an independent second reader instead of a second radiologist. Furthermore, the system has potential in a first-reader setting.

[1]  Andrew Hayen,et al.  2220 MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING DETECTS SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER AND COULD BE USED TO REDUCE UNNECESSARY BIOPSIES: INITIAL RESULTS FROM A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL , 2013 .

[2]  P Tiwari,et al.  Multimodal wavelet embedding representation for data combination (MaWERiC): integrating magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for prostate cancer detection , 2012, NMR in biomedicine.

[3]  Theodorus H van der Kwast,et al.  A critical analysis of the tumor volume threshold for clinically insignificant prostate cancer using a data set of a randomized screening trial. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[4]  R. Lenkinski,et al.  Central gland and peripheral zone prostate tumors have significantly different quantitative imaging signatures on 3 tesla endorectal, in vivo T2‐weighted MR imagery , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  Stefan Klein,et al.  Automatic segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images by atlas matching using localized mutual information. , 2008, Medical physics.

[6]  H. Huisman,et al.  Interpatient variation in normal peripheral zone apparent diffusion coefficient: effect on the prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness. , 2012, Radiology.

[7]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Simulated required accuracy of image registration tools for targeting high-grade cancer components with prostate biopsies , 2013, European Radiology.

[8]  J. Friedman Special Invited Paper-Additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boosting , 2000 .

[9]  William Wells,et al.  Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, T2-mapping and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; a multichannel statistical classifier. , 2003, Medical physics.

[10]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Computer-assisted analysis of peripheral zone prostate lesions using T2-weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced T1-weighted MRI , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Automated computer-aided detection of prostate cancer in MR images: from a whole-organ to a zone-based approach , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[13]  Qiang Li,et al.  Selective enhancement filters for nodules, vessels, and airway walls in two- and three-dimensional CT scans. , 2003, Medical physics.

[14]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Automatic computer-aided detection of prostate cancer based on multiparametric magnetic resonance image analysis , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Kazuro Sugimura,et al.  Prostate cancer detection with 3 T MRI: Comparison of diffusion‐weighted imaging and dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in combination with T2‐weighted imaging , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  A Pattern Recognition Approach to Zonal Segmentation of the Prostate on MRI , 2012, MICCAI.

[17]  J. Fütterer,et al.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 , 2012, European Radiology.

[18]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Multi-kernel graph embedding for detection, Gleason grading of prostate cancer via MRI/MRS , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[19]  Heinz-Otto Peitgen,et al.  Morphological segmentation and partial volume analysis for volumetry of solid pulmonary lesions in thoracic CT scans , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Nicholas Petrick,et al.  CT colonography computer-aided polyp detection: Effect on radiologist observers of polyp identification by CAD on both the supine and prone scans. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[21]  Emilie Niaf,et al.  Influence of imaging and histological factors on prostate cancer detection and localisation on multiparametric MRI: a prospective study , 2013, European Radiology.

[22]  A. Evans,et al.  Prostate cancer detection with multi‐parametric MRI: Logistic regression analysis of quantitative T2, diffusion‐weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Prospective assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using 3-T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies versus a systematic 10-core transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy cohort. , 2012, European urology.

[24]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Computer aided detection of masses in mammograms as decision support. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[25]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2013 , 2013, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[26]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Label Fusion in Atlas-Based Segmentation Using a Selective and Iterative Method for Performance Level Estimation (SIMPLE) , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  H. Huisman,et al.  Accurate estimation of pharmacokinetic contrast‐enhanced dynamic MRI parameters of the prostate , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer in the peripheral zone using multiparametric MRI , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  Ayman El-Baz,et al.  A diffusion-weighted imaging based diagnostic system for early detection of prostate cancer , 2013 .

[30]  Colin Studholme,et al.  Deformation-based mapping of volume change from serial brain MRI in the presence of local tissue contrast change , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[32]  Adam S. Kibel,et al.  Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European Study , 2009 .