Single-cell gene regulatory network analysis reveals new melanoma cell states and transition trajectories during phenotype switching

Melanoma is notorious for its cellular heterogeneity, which is at least partly due to its ability to transition between alternate cell states. Similarly to EMT, melanoma cells with a melanocytic phenotype can switch to a mesenchymal-like phenotype. However, scattered emerging evidence indicates that additional, intermediate state(s) may exist. In order to search for such new melanoma states and decipher their underlying gene regulatory network (GRN), we extensively studied ten patient-derived melanoma cultures by single-cell RNA-seq of >39,000 cells. Although each culture exhibited a unique transcriptome, we identified shared gene regulatory networks that underlie the extreme melanocytic and mesenchymal cell states, as well as one (stable) intermediate state. The intermediate state was corroborated by a distinct open chromatin landscape and governed by the transcription factors EGR3, NFATC2, and RXRG. Single-cell migration assays established that this “transition” state exhibits an intermediate migratory phenotype. Through a dense time-series sampling of single cells and dynamic GRN inference, we unraveled the sequential and recurrent arrangement of transcriptional programs at play during phenotype switching that ultimately lead to the mesenchymal cell state. We provide the scRNA-Seq data with 39,263 melanoma cells on our SCope platform and the ATAC-seq data on a UCSC hub to jointly serve as a resource for the melanoma field. Together, this exhaustive analysis of melanoma cell state diversity indicates that additional states exists between the two extreme melanocytic and mesenchymal-like states. The GRN we identified may serve as a new putative target to prevent the switch to mesenchymal cell state and thereby, acquisition of metastatic and drug resistant potential.

[1]  Karen Dawisha,et al.  Russia and the New States of Eurasia: The Nuclear Factor , 1994 .

[2]  L. Chin,et al.  An amino-terminal domain of Mxi1 mediates anti-myc oncogenic activity and interacts with a homolog of the Yeast Transcriptional Repressor SIN3 , 1995, Cell.

[3]  W. Pavan,et al.  SOX10 mutation disrupts neural crest development in Dom Hirschsprung mouse model , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Hiroyuki Ogata,et al.  KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  E. Ziff,et al.  Mxi1 Is a Repressor of the c-myc Promoter and Reverses Activation by USF* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  M. Glimcher,et al.  The Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cells (Nfat) Transcription Factor Nfatp (Nfatc2) Is a Repressor of Chondrogenesis , 2000, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[7]  Susumu Goto,et al.  KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  L. Glimcher,et al.  NFATc1 and NFATc2 together control both T and B cell activation and differentiation. , 2001, Immunity.

[9]  J. Decaprio,et al.  NFATc2-mediated repression of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 expression. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[10]  J. Baraban,et al.  A Dominant Negative Egr Inhibitor Blocks Nerve Growth Factor-Induced Neurite Outgrowth by Suppressing c-Jun Activation: Role of an Egr/c-Jun Complex , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  P. Shannon,et al.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. , 2003, Genome research.

[12]  J. Briscoe,et al.  Neural crest development is regulated by the transcription factor Sox9 , 2003, Development.

[13]  D. Rowitch,et al.  Sox9 is required for determination of the chondrogenic cell lineage in the cranial neural crest , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  I. Zachary,et al.  Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor–Regulated Gene Expression in Endothelial Cells: KDR-Mediated Induction of Egr3 and the Related Nuclear Receptors Nur77, Nurr1, and Nor1 , 2003, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[15]  R. Hammer,et al.  Defining the spermatogonial stem cell. , 2004, Developmental biology.

[16]  H. Scharfman,et al.  Brain-derived neurotrophic factor. , 2004, Growth factors.

[17]  Pablo Tamayo,et al.  Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  A. Weeraratna,et al.  Interleukin-1 alpha mediates the growth proliferative effects of transforming growth factor-beta in p21 null MCF-10A human mammary epithelial cells , 2006, Oncogene.

[19]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Metastatic potential of melanomas defined by specific gene expression profiles with no BRAF signature. , 2006, Pigment cell research.

[20]  A. Rao,et al.  The NFAT1 Transcription Factor is a Repressor of Cyclin A2 Gene Expression , 2007, Cell cycle.

[21]  Georgia Panagiotakos,et al.  Isolation and directed differentiation of neural crest stem cells derived from human embryonic stem cells , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  L. Altucci,et al.  RAR and RXR modulation in cancer and metabolic disease , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[23]  Clifford A. Meyer,et al.  Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) , 2008, Genome Biology.

[24]  R. Dummer,et al.  In vivo switching of human melanoma cells between proliferative and invasive states. , 2008, Cancer research.

[25]  G. Hampton,et al.  Overlapping gene expression profiles of cell migration and tumor invasion in human bladder cancer identify metallothionein 1E and nicotinamide N-methyltransferase as novel regulators of cell migration , 2008, Oncogene.

[26]  G. Bartolini,et al.  6-OH-11-hydroxyphenantrene and PPARgamma ligands in combination to inhibit proliferation and invasiveness in colon cancer cells , 2008 .

[27]  Gonçalo R. Abecasis,et al.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools , 2009, Bioinform..

[28]  F. Maczkowiak,et al.  Reiterative AP2a activity controls sequential steps in the neural crest gene regulatory network , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  C. Glass,et al.  Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[30]  P. Geurts,et al.  Inferring Regulatory Networks from Expression Data Using Tree-Based Methods , 2010, PloS one.

[31]  J. Goodrich,et al.  The C-terminal region of human NFATc2 binds cJun to synergistically activate interleukin-2 transcription. , 2010, Molecular immunology.

[32]  K. Hoek,et al.  Cancer stem cells versus phenotype‐switching in melanoma , 2010, Pigment cell & melanoma research.

[33]  Mark D. Robinson,et al.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data , 2009, Bioinform..

[34]  A. Papi,et al.  RXRgamma and PPARgamma ligands in combination to inhibit proliferation and invasiveness in colon cancer cells. , 2010, Cancer letters.

[35]  N. D. Clarke,et al.  Integrative model of genomic factors for determining binding site selection by estrogen receptor-α , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[36]  A. Weeraratna,et al.  Differential LEF1 and TCF4 expression is involved in melanoma cell phenotype switching , 2011, Pigment cell & melanoma research.

[37]  Aydogan Ozcan,et al.  Field-portable lensfree tomographic microscope. , 2011, Lab on a Chip.

[38]  R. Dummer,et al.  A proliferative melanoma cell phenotype is responsive to RAF/MEK inhibition independent of BRAF mutation status , 2011, Pigment cell & melanoma research.

[39]  A. Miyauchi,et al.  Retinoid X receptor γ up‐regulation is correlated with dedifferentiation of tumor cells and lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma , 2011, Pathology international.

[40]  R. Dummer,et al.  Systematic classification of melanoma cells by phenotype‐specific gene expression mapping , 2012, Pigment cell & melanoma research.

[41]  J. Landsberg,et al.  Melanomas resist T-cell therapy through inflammation-induced reversible dedifferentiation , 2012, Nature.

[42]  A. Brooks-Kayal,et al.  Brain‐derived neurotrophic factor uses CREB and Egr3 to regulate NMDA receptor levels in cortical neurons , 2012, Journal of neurochemistry.

[43]  Davis J. McCarthy,et al.  Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[44]  Matthew R. Dallas,et al.  Chemotaxis of Cell Populations through Confined Spaces at Single-Cell Resolution , 2012, PloS one.

[45]  Steven L Salzberg,et al.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2 , 2012, Nature Methods.

[46]  E. Zabarovsky,et al.  Tumor suppressor dual‐specificity phosphatase 6 (DUSP6) impairs cell invasion and epithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EMT)‐associated phenotype , 2012, International journal of cancer.

[47]  Alistair L. J. Symonds,et al.  The Transcription Factors Egr2 and Egr3 Are Essential for the Control of Inflammation and Antigen-Induced Proliferation of B and T Cells , 2012, Immunity.

[48]  Hubing Shi,et al.  MDM4 is a key therapeutic target in cutaneous melanoma , 2012, Nature Medicine.

[49]  Xiuxia Qu,et al.  Glycosaminoglycan-dependent restriction of FGF diffusion is necessary for lacrimal gland development , 2012, Development.

[50]  T. Gress,et al.  Restricted heterochromatin formation links NFATc2 repressor activity with growth promotion in pancreatic cancer. , 2012, Gastroenterology.

[51]  Erik Aronesty,et al.  Comparison of Sequencing Utility Programs , 2013 .

[52]  W. Tourtellotte,et al.  A Sympathetic Neuron Autonomous Role for Egr3-Mediated Gene Regulation in Dendrite Morphogenesis and Target Tissue Innervation , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  Daniel Müllner,et al.  fastcluster: Fast Hierarchical, Agglomerative Clustering Routines for R and Python , 2013 .

[54]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer , 2013, Nature.

[55]  Thomas R. Gingeras,et al.  STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner , 2013, Bioinform..

[56]  J. Goodrich,et al.  NFATc2 recruits cJun homodimers to an NFAT site to synergistically activate interleukin-2 transcription. , 2013, Molecular immunology.

[57]  J. Lachuer,et al.  A switch in the expression of embryonic EMT-inducers drives the development of malignant melanoma. , 2013, Cancer cell.

[58]  R. Fontana,et al.  Minimum-Size Mixed-Level Orthogonal Fractional Factorial Designs Generation: A SAS-Based Algorithm , 2013 .

[59]  Timothy E. Reddy,et al.  Distinct properties of cell-type-specific and shared transcription factor binding sites. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[60]  D. Aust,et al.  WNT5A-NFAT signaling mediates resistance to apoptosis in pancreatic cancer. , 2013, Neoplasia.

[61]  T. Graeber,et al.  Low MITF/AXL ratio predicts early resistance to multiple targeted drugs in melanoma , 2014, Nature Communications.

[62]  R. Bernards,et al.  Reversible and adaptive resistance to BRAF(V600E) inhibition in melanoma , 2014, Nature.

[63]  W. Huber,et al.  Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2 , 2014, Genome Biology.

[64]  R. Scolyer,et al.  A novel hypoxia-associated subset of FN1highMITFlow melanoma cells: identification, characterization, and prognostic value , 2014, Modern Pathology.

[65]  H. Zhu,et al.  Curculigoside A induces angiogenesis through VCAM-1/Egr-3/CREB/VEGF signaling pathway , 2014, Neuroscience.

[66]  G. Berx,et al.  Identification of a ZEB2-MITF-ZEB1 transcriptional network that controls melanogenesis and melanoma progression , 2014, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[67]  J. Mesirov,et al.  A melanoma cell state distinction influences sensitivity to MAPK pathway inhibitors. , 2014, Cancer discovery.

[68]  N. Haass,et al.  Real‐time cell cycle imaging during melanoma growth, invasion, and drug response , 2014, Pigment cell & melanoma research.

[69]  D. Lipsker,et al.  Single-cell gene expression signatures reveal melanoma cell heterogeneity , 2014, Oncogene.

[70]  Wei Shi,et al.  featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features , 2013, Bioinform..

[71]  Stein Aerts,et al.  i-cisTarget 2015 update: generalized cis-regulatory enrichment analysis in human, mouse and fly , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[72]  S. Aerts,et al.  Transcription factor MITF and remodeller BRG1 define chromatin organisation at regulatory elements in melanoma cells , 2015, eLife.

[73]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Genomic Classification of Cutaneous Melanoma , 2015, Cell.

[74]  D. Gautheret,et al.  New Functional Signatures for Understanding Melanoma Biology from Tumor Cell Lineage-Specific Analysis , 2015, Cell reports.

[75]  P. Meltzer,et al.  Antagonistic Cross-Regulation between Sox9 and Sox10 Controls an Anti-tumorigenic Program in Melanoma , 2015, PLoS genetics.

[76]  J. Landsberg,et al.  MITF and c-Jun antagonism interconnects melanoma dedifferentiation with pro-inflammatory cytokine responsiveness and myeloid cell recruitment , 2015, Nature Communications.

[77]  S. Aerts,et al.  Decoding the regulatory landscape of melanoma reveals TEADS as regulators of the invasive cell state , 2015, Nature Communications.

[78]  J. Mesirov,et al.  The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. , 2015, Cell systems.

[79]  Evan Z. Macosko,et al.  Highly Parallel Genome-wide Expression Profiling of Individual Cells Using Nanoliter Droplets , 2015, Cell.

[80]  J. Mesirov,et al.  The Molecular Signatures Database Hallmark Gene Set Collection , 2015 .

[81]  M. Bronner,et al.  Establishing neural crest identity: a gene regulatory recipe , 2015, Development.

[82]  Qing-Yu He,et al.  ChIPseeker: an R/Bioconductor package for ChIP peak annotation, comparison and visualization , 2015, Bioinform..

[83]  Paul Theodor Pyl,et al.  HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data , 2014, bioRxiv.

[84]  Chao Zhao,et al.  Vitamin D receptor–retinoid X receptor heterodimer signaling regulates oligodendrocyte progenitor cell differentiation , 2015, The Journal of cell biology.

[85]  Z. Jia,et al.  Early Growth Response 3 regulates genes of inflammation and directly activates IL6 and IL8 expression in prostate cancer , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.

[86]  R. Young,et al.  CDK7-Dependent Transcriptional Addiction in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer , 2015, Cell.

[87]  J. Sosman,et al.  Genomic and Transcriptomic Features of Response to Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma , 2017, Cell.

[88]  Roland Eils,et al.  Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data , 2016, Bioinform..

[89]  Y. Saeys,et al.  SCORPIUS improves trajectory inference and identifies novel modules in dendritic cell development , 2016, bioRxiv.

[90]  L. Lagae,et al.  Time-lapse lens-free imaging of cell migration in diverse physical microenvironments. , 2016, Lab on a chip.

[91]  Fidel Ramírez,et al.  deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[92]  J. Sosman,et al.  Genomic and Transcriptomic Features of Response to Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma , 2016, Cell.

[93]  Charles H. Yoon,et al.  Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single-cell RNA-seq , 2016, Science.

[94]  A. Anichini,et al.  NFATc2 is an intrinsic regulator of melanoma dedifferentiation , 2016, Oncogene.

[95]  Guocheng Yuan,et al.  GiniClust: detecting rare cell types from single-cell gene expression data with Gini index , 2016, Genome Biology.

[96]  Måns Magnusson,et al.  MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report , 2016, Bioinform..

[97]  J. Aerts,et al.  SCENIC: Single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering , 2017, Nature Methods.

[98]  Hannah A. Pliner,et al.  Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell trajectories , 2017, Nature Methods.

[99]  Pierre Geurts,et al.  SCENIC: Single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering , 2017 .

[100]  L. Chin,et al.  Biomarker Accessible and Chemically Addressable Mechanistic Subtypes of BRAF Melanoma. , 2017, Cancer discovery.

[101]  Nicholas A. Sinnott-Armstrong,et al.  An improved ATAC-seq protocol reduces background and enables interrogation of frozen tissues , 2017, Nature Methods.

[102]  W. Pavan,et al.  TFAP2 paralogs regulate melanocyte differentiation in parallel with MITF , 2017, PLoS genetics.

[103]  Mariella G. Filbin,et al.  Decoupling genetics, lineages, and microenvironment in IDH-mutant gliomas by single-cell RNA-seq , 2017, Science.

[104]  Sydney M. Shaffer,et al.  Rare cell variability and drug-induced reprogramming as a mode of cancer drug resistance , 2017, Nature.

[105]  Shawn M. Gillespie,et al.  Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis of Primary and Metastatic Tumor Ecosystems in Head and Neck Cancer , 2017, Cell.

[106]  Matthew J. Daniels,et al.  Translation reprogramming is an evolutionarily conserved driver of phenotypic plasticity and therapeutic resistance in melanoma , 2017, Genes & development.

[107]  D. Lipsker,et al.  MITF-High and MITF-Low Cells and a Novel Subpopulation Expressing Genes of Both Cell States Contribute to Intra- and Intertumoral Heterogeneity of Primary Melanoma , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[108]  Lai Guan Ng,et al.  Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[109]  Daphne M. Tsoucas,et al.  GiniClust2: a cluster-aware, weighted ensemble clustering method for cell-type detection , 2018, Genome Biology.

[110]  P. Verstreken,et al.  A Single-Cell Transcriptome Atlas of the Aging Drosophila Brain , 2018, Cell.

[111]  Paul Hoffman,et al.  Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[112]  Laleh Haghverdi,et al.  Batch effects in single-cell RNA-sequencing data are corrected by matching mutual nearest neighbors , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[113]  K. Flaherty,et al.  Toward Minimal Residual Disease-Directed Therapy in Melanoma , 2018, Cell.

[114]  Jan Luts,et al.  Semiparametric Regression Analysis via Infer.NET , 2018 .

[115]  R. Young,et al.  High MITF Expression Is Associated with Super-Enhancers and Suppressed by CDK7 Inhibition in Melanoma. , 2018, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[116]  P. Carmeliet,et al.  Phenotype molding of stromal cells in the lung tumor microenvironment , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[117]  Diano F. Marrone,et al.  The Immediate Early Gene Egr3 Is Required for Hippocampal Induction of Bdnf by Electroconvulsive Stimulation , 2018, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[118]  T. Graeber,et al.  Multi-stage Differentiation Defines Melanoma Subtypes with Differential Vulnerability to Drug-Induced Iron-Dependent Oxidative Stress. , 2018, Cancer cell.

[119]  Monika S. Kowalczyk,et al.  A Cancer Cell Program Promotes T Cell Exclusion and Resistance to Checkpoint Blockade , 2018, Cell.

[120]  Mauro A. A. Castro,et al.  The chromatin accessibility landscape of primary human cancers , 2018, Science.

[121]  Michael Ferry,et al.  ggtern: Ternary Diagrams Using ggplot2 , 2018 .

[122]  G. Wahl,et al.  Epigenetic and Transcriptomic Profiling of Mammary Gland Development and Tumor Models Disclose Regulators of Cell State Plasticity. , 2018, Cancer cell.

[123]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Alignment of single-cell trajectories to compare cellular expression dynamics , 2018, Nature Methods.

[124]  Paul J. Hoffman,et al.  Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Data , 2018, Cell.

[125]  C. Deng,et al.  SMAD signaling promotes melanoma metastasis independently of phenotype switching. , 2019, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[126]  Stein Aerts,et al.  cisTopic: cis-regulatory topic modeling on single-cell ATAC-seq data , 2019, Nature Methods.

[127]  C. Wellbrock,et al.  Phenotype plasticity as enabler of melanoma progression and therapy resistance , 2019, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[128]  Yves Moreau,et al.  GRNBoost2 and Arboreto: efficient and scalable inference of gene regulatory networks , 2018, Bioinform..

[129]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  Current best practices in single‐cell RNA‐seq analysis: a tutorial , 2019, Molecular systems biology.

[130]  R. Wollman,et al.  Mammalian gene expression variability is explained by underlying cell state , 2019, bioRxiv.

[131]  Evan Z. Macosko,et al.  Single-Cell Multi-omic Integration Compares and Contrasts Features of Brain Cell Identity , 2019, Cell.

[132]  Yan Lu,et al.  Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis. , 2020, Comprehensive Physiology.