A sensitivity-based approach for adaptive decomposition of anticipatory network traffic control

Abstract Anticipatory optimal network control is defined as the problem of determining the set of control actions that minimizes a network-wide objective function. This not only takes into account local consequences on the propagation of flows, but also the global network-wide routing behavior of the users. Such an objective function is, in general, defined in a centralized setting, as knowledge regarding the whole network is needed to correctly compute it. Reaching a level of centralization sufficient to attain network-wide control objectives is however rarely realistic in practice. Multiple authorities are influencing different portions the network, separated either hierarchically or geographically. The distributed nature of networks and traffic directly influences the complexity of the anticipatory control problem. This is our motivation for this work, in which we introduce a decomposition mechanism for the global anticipatory network traffic control problem, based on dynamic clustering of traffic controllers. Rather than solving the full centralized problem, or blindly performing a full controller-wise decomposition, this technique allows recognizing when and which controllers should be grouped in clusters, and when, instead, these can be optimized separately. The practical relevance with respect to our motivation is that our approach allows identification of those network traffic conditions in which multiple actors need to actively coordinate their actions, or when unilateral action suffices for still approximating global optimality. This clustering procedure is based on well-known algebraic and statistical tools that exploit the network’s sensitivity to control and its structure to deduce coupling behavior. We devise several case studies in order to assess our newly introduced procedure’s performances, in comparison with fully decomposed and fully centralized anticipatory optimal network control, and show that our approach is able to outperform both centralized and decomposed procedures.

[1]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Optimal Perimeter Control for Two Urban Regions With Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams: A Model Predictive Approach , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[2]  Hai Yang,et al.  TRAFFIC RESTRAINT, ROAD PRICING AND NETWORK EQUILIBRIUM , 1997 .

[3]  Guido Gentile,et al.  Using the General Link Transmission Model in a Dynamic Traffic Assignment to Simulate Congestion on Urban Networks , 2015 .

[4]  R E Allsop SOME POSSIBILITIES FOR USING TRAFFIC CONTROL TO INFLUENCE TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ROUTE CHOICE , 1974 .

[5]  Ronald T. van Katwijk,et al.  Multi-Agent Look-Ahead Traffic-Adaptive Control , 2008 .

[6]  Fei-Yue Wang,et al.  Agent-Based Control for Networked Traffic Management Systems , 2005, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[7]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Efficiency and equity properties of freeway network-wide ramp metering with AMOC , 2004 .

[8]  Robert B. Dial,et al.  A path-based user-equilibrium traffic assignment algorithm that obviates path storage and enumeration , 2006 .

[9]  Dirk Cattrysse,et al.  A generic class of first order node models for dynamic macroscopic simulation of traffic flows , 2011 .

[10]  Stephen D. Boyles,et al.  A Continuous DUE Algorithm Using the Link Transmission Model , 2015 .

[11]  Chris H. Q. Ding,et al.  K-means clustering via principal component analysis , 2004, ICML.

[12]  Nathan H. Gartner,et al.  Implementation of the OPAC adaptive control strategy in a traffic signal network , 2001, ITSC 2001. 2001 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8585).

[13]  R. D. Bretherton,et al.  Optimizing networks of traffic signals in real time-the SCOOT method , 1991 .

[14]  R. Courant,et al.  On the Partial Difference Equations, of Mathematical Physics , 2015 .

[15]  Francesco Corman,et al.  Assessing partial observability in network sensor location problems , 2014 .

[16]  Lucas Barcelos de Oliveira,et al.  Multi-agent Model Predictive Control of Signaling Split in Urban Traffic Networks ∗ , 2010 .

[17]  Satish V. Ukkusuri,et al.  A Bi-level Formulation for the Combined Dynamic Equilibrium based Traffic Signal Control , 2013 .

[18]  Tom Holvoet,et al.  Centralized and decomposed anticipatory Model Predictive Control for network-wide Ramp Metering , 2013, 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013).

[19]  Ka Yee Yeung,et al.  Principal component analysis for clustering gene expression data , 2001, Bioinform..

[20]  Antonio Sforza,et al.  ITERATIVE PROCEDURE FOR EQUILIBRIUM NETWORK TRAFFIC SIGNAL SETTING , 1991 .

[21]  Sophie Midenet,et al.  The real-time urban traffic control system CRONOS: Algorithm and experiments , 2006 .

[22]  Isaak Yperman,et al.  The Link Transmission Model for dynamic network loading , 2007 .

[23]  Henk Taale,et al.  Integrated anticipatory control of road networks: A game-theoretical approach , 2008 .

[24]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Cooperative traffic control of a mixed network with two urban regions and a freeway , 2013 .

[25]  Carlos Bordons Alba,et al.  Model Predictive Control , 2012 .

[26]  N. Geroliminis,et al.  Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: Some experimental findings - eScholarship , 2007 .

[27]  Henk Taale,et al.  A framework for real-time integrated and anticipatory traffic management , 2013, 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013).

[28]  Dipti Srinivasan,et al.  Multi-Agent System in Urban Traffic Signal Control , 2010, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[29]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  A rolling-horizon quadratic-programming approach to the signal control problem in large-scale conges , 2009 .

[30]  Ruben Corthout,et al.  An efficient iterative link transmission model , 2016 .

[31]  William H. K. Lam,et al.  Optimal road tolls under conditions of queueing and congestion , 1996 .

[32]  P. Lowrie SCATS: Sydney Co-Ordinated Adaptive Traffic System: a traffic responsive method of controlling urban traffic , 1990 .

[33]  Chris Tampère,et al.  An extended coordinate descent method for distributed anticipatory network traffic control , 2015 .

[34]  Bart De Schutter,et al.  Fast Model Predictive Control for Urban Road Networks via MILP , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[35]  Tamara Djukic,et al.  Application of Principal Component Analysis to Predict Dynamic Origin–Destination Matrices , 2012 .

[36]  Pitu B. Mirchandani,et al.  A REAL-TIME TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL SYSTEM: ARCHITECTURE, ALGORITHMS, AND ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[37]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[38]  Henk Taale,et al.  Network-wide Traffic Management with Integrated Anticipatory Control , 2012 .

[39]  Konstantina Papagiannaki,et al.  Structural analysis of network traffic flows , 2004, SIGMETRICS '04/Performance '04.

[40]  Xiang-Yang Li,et al.  Distributed coordinated in-vehicle online routing using mixed-strategy congestion game , 2014 .

[41]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  On the spatial partitioning of urban transportation networks , 2012 .

[42]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  A multivariable regulator approach to traffic-responsive network-wide signal control , 2000 .

[43]  Andreas Hegyi,et al.  Integrated Predictive Control of Freeway Networks Using the Extended Link Transmission Model , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[44]  Bart De Schutter,et al.  Efficient network-wide model-based predictive control for urban traffic networks , 2012 .

[45]  Francesco Viti,et al.  Improving the efficiency of repeated dynamic network loading through marginal simulation , 2014 .

[46]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Optimal Hybrid Perimeter and Switching Plans Control for Urban Traffic Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[47]  Suvrajeet Sen,et al.  Controlled Optimization of Phases at an Intersection , 1997, Transp. Sci..

[48]  Andreas Hegyi,et al.  Integrated traffic control for mixed urban and freeway networks: a model predictive control approach , 2007 .

[49]  Francesco Viti,et al.  Repeated anticipatory network traffic control using iterative optimization accounting for model bias correction. , 2016 .

[50]  Bart De Schutter,et al.  Model predictive control for optimal coordination of ramp metering and variable speed limits , 2005 .

[51]  Mike Smith,et al.  The dynamics of traffic assignment and traffic control: A theoretical study , 1990 .

[52]  Hillel Bar-Gera,et al.  Traffic Assignment by Paired Alternative Segments , 2010 .

[53]  Wang,et al.  Review of road traffic control strategies , 2003, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[54]  Peter Roberts Broyden Derivative Approximation in ISOPE Optimising and Optimal Control Algorithms , 2000 .

[55]  Tung Le,et al.  Linear-Quadratic Model Predictive Control for Urban Traffic Networks , 2013 .

[56]  Mariagrazia Dotoli,et al.  A signal timing plan formulation for urban traffic control , 2006 .

[57]  C. Tampère,et al.  Coordinate Descent based Decomposed Anticipatory Dynamic Traffic Control , 2014 .

[58]  Nathan H. Gartner,et al.  OPAC: A DEMAND-RESPONSIVE STRATEGY FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL , 1983 .

[59]  Jean-Loup Farges,et al.  THE PRODYN REAL TIME TRAFFIC ALGORITHM , 1983 .

[60]  Ruben Corthout,et al.  An implicit solution scheme for the Link Transmission Model , 2013, 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013).

[61]  Hai Yang,et al.  Traffic assignment and signal control in saturated road networks , 1995 .

[62]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Store-and-forward based methods for the signal control problem in large-scale congested urban road networks , 2009 .