Staircase procedure and constant stimuli method in cat psychophysics

We measured 73.5% correct just noticeable differences (JNDs) in bar orientation with the method of constant stimuli and with a Wetherill and Levitt staircase procedure, using a total of 25 cats. For the same number of trials per threshold assessment, the variability of the threshold remained independent of the testing method used. However, the JNDs measured using the method of constant stimuli were significantly influenced by the range of the orientation differences (ODs) utilized for measuring the JND. This effect was particularly large in incompletely trained cats, but it also was significant in extensively trained subjects. On the other hand, staircase threshold measurements were not affected by the starting OD, independently of how well the animals had been trained. This shows that the staircase procedure is a more efficient instrument with which to measure JNDs in orientation than is the method of constant stimuli. With the staircase procedure, we found that the JNDs measured at oblique reference orientations did not exceed those measured at principal reference orientations (no oblique effect). Two earlier studies from this laboratory using the method of constant stimuli did report an oblique effect. Our data suggest that this oblique effect might stem from a less efficient training at the right oblique reference orientation in these studies, combined with a relatively inefficient testing procedure such as the constant stimuli method.

[1]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  M. Berkley,et al.  Striate cortex and visual acuity functions in the cat , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  G. Orban,et al.  Meridional variations in the line orientation discrimination of the cat , 1983, Behavioural Brain Research.

[4]  G. Orban,et al.  Speeding up visual discrimination learning in cats by differential exposure of positive and negative stimuli , 1990, Behavioural Brain Research.

[5]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: The Best PEST , 1982 .

[6]  S. McKee,et al.  Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  G. Orban,et al.  Bar orientation discrimination in the cat , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[8]  G. A. Orban,et al.  Velocity discrimination in the cat , 1986, Vision Research.

[9]  P L Emerson,et al.  Observations on a maximum likelihood method of sequential threshold estimation and a simplified approximation , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions , 1967 .

[11]  G. B. Wetherill,et al.  SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION. , 1965, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[12]  W. Simpson.  The method of constant stimuli is efficient , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  R Vogels,et al.  Decision factors affecting line orientation judgments in the method of single stimuli , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  P L Emerson,et al.  Observations on maximum-likelihood and Bayesian methods of forced-choice sequential threshold estimation , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  E. Vandenbussche,et al.  Orientation discrimination in the cat: a distributed function. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.