One hand, two objects: Emergence of affordance in contexts

[1]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[2]  G. Murphy,et al.  Categorizing objects in isolation and in scenes: what a superordinate is good for. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Katherine Nelson,et al.  Taxonomic Knowledge: What Kind and When? , 1992 .

[4]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  M. Arbib,et al.  Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[6]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[7]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective Reaching to Grasp: Evidence for Distractor Interference Effects , 1997 .

[9]  U. Castiello,et al.  Upper limb movement differentiation according to taxonomic semantic category , 1998, Neuroreport.

[10]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  R. Ellis,et al.  Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[12]  Gregory L. Murphy,et al.  Thematic relations in adults' concepts. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  G. Murphy,et al.  Thematic relations in adults' concepts. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[15]  R. Ellis,et al.  The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization , 2001 .

[16]  Sarah H. Creem,et al.  Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Phase-specific modulation of cortical motor output during movement observation , 2001, Neuroreport.

[18]  S. Swinnen Intermanual coordination: From behavioural principles to neural-network interactions , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  S. Vogt,et al.  Visuomotor priming by pictures of hand postures: perspective matters , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Anna M. Borghi,et al.  Situation bounded conceptual organization in children: from action to spatial relations , 2003 .

[23]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Two hands, one brain: cognitive neuroscience of bimanual skill , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  M. Bar Visual objects in context , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  Scott H. Johnson-Frey The neural bases of complex tool use in humans , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[28]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Parietal Lobe: From Action Organization to Intention Understanding , 2005, Science.

[29]  Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al.  Neural representations of graspable objects: are tools special? , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[30]  U. Castiello The neuroscience of grasping , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  Anna M. Borghi,et al.  Conceptual information on objects’ locations , 2005, Brain and Language.

[32]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Grasping the Intentions of Others with One's Own Mirror Neuron System , 2005, PLoS biology.

[33]  L. Fogassi,et al.  Functional properties of grasping-related neurons in the ventral premotor area F5 of the macaque monkey. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Garry Young,et al.  Are different affordances subserved by different neural pathways? , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[35]  S. Tipper,et al.  Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  Paul Cisek,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Impairment of actions chains in autism and its possible role in intention understanding , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Afdc Hamilton,et al.  The motor hierarchy: from kinematics to goals and intentions , 2007 .

[39]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Dissociative effects of viewpoint and semantic priming on action and semantic decisions: Evidence for dual routes to action from vision , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  B. Mesquita,et al.  Adjustment to Chronic Diseases and Terminal Illness Health Psychology : Psychological Adjustment to Chronic Disease , 2006 .

[41]  Sandro Rubichi,et al.  Are visual stimuli sufficient to evoke motor information? Studies with hand primes , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[42]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[43]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Automatic grasp imitation following action observation affects estimation of intrinsic object properties , 2008, Brain Research.

[44]  George S. Cree,et al.  Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words , 2008, Cognition.

[45]  L. Riggio,et al.  The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[46]  Martin H Fischer,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Grasp Cueing Shows Obligatory Attention to Action Goals Grasp Cueing Shows Obligatory Attention to Action Goals , 2022 .

[47]  L. Vainio,et al.  On the relations between action planning, object identification, and motor representations of observed actions and objects , 2008, Cognition.

[48]  Anna M. Borghi,et al.  Hand–object interaction in perspective , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[49]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Conceptual knowledge for understanding other’s actions is organized primarily around action goals , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  H. Bekkering,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Motor Simulation in Verbal Knowledge Acquisition , 2022 .

[51]  Lucia Riggio,et al.  Sentence comprehension and simulation of object temporary, canonical and stable affordances , 2009, Brain Research.

[52]  Solène Kalénine,et al.  How action and context priming influence categorization: A developmental study. , 2009, The British journal of developmental psychology.

[53]  Monica Baciu,et al.  The sensory-motor specificity of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations: A behavioral and fMRI study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[54]  Vittorio Gallese,et al.  Motor abstraction: a neuroscientific account of how action goals and intentions are mapped and understood , 2009, Psychological research.

[55]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Context effects on the processing of action-relevant object features. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  R. Nicoletti,et al.  Simon-Like and Functional Affordance Effects with Tools: The Effects of Object Perceptual Discrimination and Object Action State , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[57]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Action knowledge, visuomotor activation, and embodiment in the two action systems , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[58]  Lewis A. Wheaton,et al.  Human Neuroscience , 2022 .

[59]  G. Humphreys,et al.  The paired-object affordance effect. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[60]  Steven A. Jax,et al.  Response interference between functional and structural actions linked to the same familiar object , 2010, Cognition.

[61]  D. Parisi,et al.  TRoPICALS : A Computational Embodied Neuroscience Model of Experiments on Compatibility Effects , 2010 .

[62]  G. Pezzulo,et al.  When affordances climb into your mind: Advantages of motor simulation in a memory task performed by novice and expert rock climbers , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[63]  D. Parisi,et al.  TRoPICALS: a computational embodied neuroscience model of compatibility effects. , 2010, Psychological review.

[64]  Sally A. Linkenauger,et al.  A Functional Role for Motor Simulation in Identifying Tools , 2010, Psychological science.

[65]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[66]  Lewis A. Wheaton,et al.  Neural activation for conceptual identification of correct versus incorrect tool–object pairs , 2010, Brain Research.

[67]  J. C. Mizelle,et al.  Testing perceptual limits of functional units: Are there “automatic” tendencies to associate tools and objects? , 2011, Neuroscience Letters.

[68]  M. Costantini,et al.  When objects are close to me: Affordances in the peripersonal space , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[69]  Z. Estes,et al.  Thematic thinking : the apprehension and consequences of thematic relations , 2011 .

[70]  Serge Thill,et al.  Affordances, Adaptive Tool Use and Grounded Cognition , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[71]  Anna M. Borghi,et al.  Kids observing other kids’ hands: Visuomotor priming in children , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[72]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Social grasping: From mirroring to mentalizing , 2012, NeuroImage.