Impact of Surgery on Relationship Quality in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis and Their Partners

BACKGROUND: Although social support is important for quality of life in patients undergoing surgery for ulcerative colitis, the impact of surgery on patient relationships is not known. OBJECTIVE: We examined relationship parameters in patients with ulcerative colitis and their partners before and 6 months after surgery. DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort in which we performed an exploratory analysis. SETTINGS: Patients were enrolled from an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Surgical patients with ulcerative colitis and their partners were invited to participate. INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent proctocolectomy in 1, 2, or 3 stages. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured quality of life and sexual function in patients, as well as relationship quality, empathy, and sexual satisfaction in patients and partners before and 6 months after surgery using validated questionnaires. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 74 participants, including 37 patients (25 men and 12 women) and their opposite-sex partners. Quality of life improved significantly in male and female patients after surgery. Sexual function scores also improved after surgery in male and female patients; however, the changes reached statistical significance in male patients only. Sexual satisfaction scores improved significantly after surgery in female patients and their partners. There was little change in relationship quality or empathy after surgery, with the exception of slightly improved relationship quality reported by male partners. In general, patients and partners reported levels of relationship quality and empathy similar to normative populations. LIMITATIONS: This study included a small, highly selected sample. CONCLUSIONS: Male and female patients with ulcerative colitis have high-quality relationships that are not negatively affected by surgical treatment. Changes in sexual function do not necessarily coincide with changes in sexual satisfaction in this patient population. Future studies should evaluate the effect of high-quality relationships on surgical outcomes.

[1]  J. Pruyn,et al.  Psychosocial consequences for partners of patients after total laryngectomy and for the relationship between patients and partners. , 2015, Oral oncology.

[2]  F. Amant,et al.  Long-Term Sexual Functioning in Women After Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer Stages IA to IB: A Prospective Controlled Study , 2014, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[3]  R. Eliakim,et al.  Partners of patients with inflammatory bowel disease: how important is their support? , 2014, Clinical and experimental gastroenterology.

[4]  Andrew Yule Finlay,et al.  The impact of patients’ chronic disease on family quality of life: an experience from 26 specialties , 2013, International journal of general medicine.

[5]  J. Tabibian,et al.  Health-related quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease: psychosocial, clinical, socioeconomic, and demographic predictors. , 2013, Journal of Crohn's & colitis.

[6]  J. de Vries,et al.  Quality of life, health‐related quality of life and health status in patients having restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a systematic review , 2012, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[7]  S. Hart,et al.  Gender-Specific Differences in Pelvic Organ Function After Proctectomy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease , 2011, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[8]  M. Kuzu,et al.  Permanent Stoma Not Only Affects Patients’ Quality of Life but also That of Their Spouses , 2010, World Journal of Surgery.

[9]  Z. Cohen,et al.  A Prospective Evaluation of Sexual Function and Quality of Life After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis , 2008, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[10]  T. Nichols,et al.  The Impact of Stabilizing Forces on Postsurgical Recovery in Ostomy Patients , 2008, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[11]  L. Lix,et al.  Population‐based controlled study of social support, self‐perceived stress, activity and work issues, and access to health care in inflammatory bowel disease , 2008, Inflammatory bowel diseases.

[12]  M. Silverberg,et al.  The impact of ulcerative colitis is greater in unmarried and young patients. , 2007, Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie.

[13]  Ron D Hays,et al.  Correlated physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 and SF-12 Health Survey, V.1 , 2007, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[14]  A. Darzi,et al.  The Effect of Restorative Proctocolectomy on Sexual Function, Urinary Function, Fertility, Pregnancy and Delivery: A Systematic Review , 2007, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[15]  J. Graham,et al.  The Dyadic Adjustment Scale: A Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis , 2006 .

[16]  K. Hansson,et al.  The Effectiveness of Couple Therapy , 2005 .

[17]  Stephanie L. Dickinson,et al.  Hostile marital interactions, proinflammatory cytokine production, and wound healing. , 2005, Archives of general psychiatry.

[18]  J. Connor,et al.  Male sexual function improves after ileal pouch anal anastomosis , 2005, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[19]  E. McColl,et al.  A comparison of the discriminatory power of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire and the SF-36 in people with ulcerative colitis , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[20]  L. Hultén,et al.  Sexuality in patients with ulcerative colitis before and after restorative proctocolectomy: a prospective study , 2004, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[21]  MarkWThompson-Fawcett.  Pouches and Stomas , 2004 .

[22]  B. George,et al.  Impotence after mesorectal and close rectal dissection for inflammatory bowel disease , 2001, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[23]  A. Cohen,et al.  Psychological distress, social support, and disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease , 2001, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[24]  K. Sharp,et al.  Ileoanal Pouch versus Ileostomy: Is There a Difference in Quality of Life? , 2000, The American surgeon.

[25]  Z. Cohen,et al.  Coping behavior and social support contribute independently to quality of life after surgery for inflammatory bowel disease , 2000, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[26]  J. Salyer,et al.  Patients' and their spouses' needs after total joint arthroplasty: a pilot study. , 2000, Orthopedic nursing.

[27]  Candace S. Brown,et al.  The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. , 2000, Journal of sex & marital therapy.

[28]  R. Rosenheck,et al.  The effects of marital dissolution and marital quality on health and health service use among women. , 1999, Medical care.

[29]  J. Tiainen,et al.  Ileal J-pouch--anal anastomosis, sexual dysfunction, and fertility. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[30]  I. Osterloh,et al.  The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. , 1997, Urology.

[31]  C. Barker,et al.  The partner relationship in psychological response to breast cancer. , 1995, Social science & medicine.

[32]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[33]  G. Guyatt,et al.  A new measure of health status for clinical trials in inflammatory bowel disease. , 1989, Gastroenterology.

[34]  R. Frantz,et al.  Adjustment problems of spouses of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery during early convalescence. , 1988, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[35]  J. E. Dalton.  Sex differences in communication skills as measured by a modified relationship inventory , 1983 .

[36]  M. Gloeckner.  Partner reaction following ostomy surgery. , 1983, Journal of sex & marital therapy.

[37]  Karen Smith Wampler,et al.  The Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory as a Measure of Marital Satisfaction. , 1982 .

[38]  M. Leeds.  John Douglas Pickup. , 1977, Lancet.

[39]  G. Spanier.  Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads , 1976 .